new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 produces a live EXIT verdict, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a pool that has some fee-based activity but limited volume relative to liquidity and no reward support. Its rank of #1207 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools, but does not remove memecoin-specific liquidity and price risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls further, or total APR collapses; it would improve only if sustained volume and fee income rise without a corresponding liquidity deterioration.
Computed 2026-09-28 15:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$84.21K
Total value locked
$469.60
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -15.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow initial SOL/BONKAI range, monitor whether price leaves it, and close the position if pool TVL falls below $84K rather than waiting for fee income to compensate for deteriorating exit liquidity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $469.60 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.17 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-BONKAI pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3510 of 73952 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7161 of 125017
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-BONKAI liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BONKAI into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can end up weighted toward the token that loses value, and the pool currently has no reward-based income.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 0.5% consists of 0.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, so the position is not currently supported by emissions. The reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, making future reward changes difficult to model.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and the share of liquidity that remained in range are not reported, so recent price-path and range-efficiency risk cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, BONKAI can experience abrupt repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and fee income that falls faster than the token price. With no current reward contribution, emission decay is not the immediate return driver, but any future incentives should be treated as temporary and exit timing should account for liquidity withdrawal during volatility.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the primary network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single memecoin pool. SOL price moves change the relative inventory held by the LP, so a sharp SOL move against BONKAI can increase divergence loss even when swap fees continue.
tollBONKAI Context
BONKAI is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity depth outside this pool should be verified before sizing a position or assuming an orderly exit. A sharp BONKAI repricing can shift the LP toward the depreciating asset, while thin external liquidity can amplify slippage and make rebalancing more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BONKAI into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can end up weighted toward the token that loses value, and the pool currently has no reward-based income.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2btKXn44Kej38f1mmy1p3MjyuCoJWc2vMhsn2SS8M7JV
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- BONKAI (hqYtLoxv…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
45%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently contributing to the pool's return. The total APR of 0.5% is currently supported by 0.5% in fees, but future emissions should not be assumed without a confirmed schedule.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently contributing to the pool's return. The total APR of 0.5% is currently supported by 0.5% in fees, but future emissions should not be assumed without a confirmed schedule.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, there is no active reward yield to remove from the displayed return. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on 0.5% and whether trading volume remains sufficient to generate fees.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, there is no active reward yield to remove from the displayed return. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on 0.5% and whether trading volume remains sufficient to generate fees.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because BONKAI can reprice quickly and external liquidity may be limited. This pool has $84K of liquidity, $470 in 24-hour volume, and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are not reported.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because BONKAI can reprice quickly and external liquidity may be limited. This pool has $84K of liquidity, $470 in 24-hour volume, and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are not reported.
For SOL-BONKAI, consider exiting when pool TVL falls below $84K, trading activity weakens materially, or BONKAI begins a rapid move that pushes the position outside its selected range. Do not rely on the 0.5% headline if fee generation is declining or exit liquidity is thinning.
For SOL-BONKAI, consider exiting when pool TVL falls below $84K, trading activity weakens materially, or BONKAI begins a rapid move that pushes the position outside its selected range. Do not rely on the 0.5% headline if fee generation is declining or exit liquidity is thinning.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future trading volume is uncertain. At 0.5%, any simple fee-payback estimate would assume stable prices, stable volume, and uninterrupted fee generation, conditions that are particularly uncertain for a SOL memecoin pool.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future trading volume is uncertain. At 0.5%, any simple fee-payback estimate would assume stable prices, stable volume, and uninterrupted fee generation, conditions that are particularly uncertain for a SOL memecoin pool.
