SOL-GALAon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $90.30K
- APR
- 5.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $5.26K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- 2sHVae7h…LSwG · observed 2026-09-20
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 46/100, with Enter at 40/100, Hold at 53/100, and Exit at 28/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #830 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, this places SOL-GALA in a monitor-and-hold category rather than an unqualified entry signal: fee generation is meaningful, but the MEMECOIN classification, limited TVL, and unverified range and IL history constrain confidence. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, collapse in fee APR, or evidence that price is persistently outside the active range would change the assessment toward exit; stronger liquidity and durable fee volume could support an entry reassessment.
Computed 2026-09-20 19:59 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$90.30K
Total value locked
$5.26K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up5.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor, set an alert at each range boundary, and rebalance or exit when price reaches a boundary while volume weakens or TVL drains; do not leave a concentrated position unattended through a GALA volatility spike.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 5.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 5.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.26K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $13.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-GALA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#749 of 17026 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3694 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GALA liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GALA into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes can leave you with a different mix of the two assets and may reduce your result compared with simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR decomposes into 5.5% from trading fees and 0.2% from rewards. 97% of yield comes from fees, so current returns depend on continued swap activity rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reliable reward-expiry estimate is available; any future emission decay would reduce the reward component but would not directly remove fee income.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, so recent divergence risk cannot be quantified from the supplied data. Seven-day tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, leaving actual range utilization unverified. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, SOL-GALA carries sharp price-dislocation risk, possible liquidity withdrawal, and exit-timing risk; emission decay can accelerate exits even when current fee income remains present.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a memecoin-family counterpart. SOL price moves change the pool's relative price and can create impermanent loss when SOL appreciates or falls sharply against GALA; concentrated liquidity also requires managing the position as price crosses its selected range.
tollGALA Context
GALA is the paired asset and is likely to have thinner and more fragmented liquidity on Solana than SOL, increasing sensitivity to pool-specific flow. A rapid GALA move against SOL can move the position out of range, alter the asset mix received by the LP, and make exit execution more dependent on available pool liquidity.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GALA into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes can leave you with a different mix of the two assets and may reduce your result compared with simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2sHVae7hEj3HpgjPwkwaFMhjZT4veY9U55fF8CxqLSwG
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GALA (eEUiUs4J…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.2%, while the fee component is 5.5%. Because 97% of current yield comes from fees, emission decay would mainly matter if rewards are introduced or become material; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only component is 0.2%, while the fee component is 5.5%. Because 97% of current yield comes from fees, emission decay would mainly matter if rewards are introduced or become material; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward contribution is 0.2%, so there is no stated reward component currently supporting the quoted APR. If incentives expire after being added, the remaining return would need to come from 5.5%, and lower trader activity could reduce that fee income.
The current reward contribution is 0.2%, so there is no stated reward component currently supporting the quoted APR. If incentives expire after being added, the remaining return would need to come from 5.5%, and lower trader activity could reduce that fee income.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile SOL pair because this MEMECOIN-family pool has TVL of $90K and depends on 24h volume of $5K for fee generation. Price divergence between SOL and GALA, thin exit liquidity, and concentrated-range exposure can all produce losses beyond ordinary trading-fee variability.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile SOL pair because this MEMECOIN-family pool has TVL of $90K and depends on 24h volume of $5K for fee generation. Price divergence between SOL and GALA, thin exit liquidity, and concentrated-range exposure can all produce losses beyond ordinary trading-fee variability.
Use a range-boundary breach combined with weakening volume, falling TVL, or a sharp reduction in fee APR as an exit signal. For SOL-GALA, reassess promptly if the position remains out of range or if the fee-driven return no longer compensates for GALA price and liquidity risk.
Use a range-boundary breach combined with weakening volume, falling TVL, or a sharp reduction in fee APR as an exit signal. For SOL-GALA, reassess promptly if the position remains out of range or if the fee-driven return no longer compensates for GALA price and liquidity risk.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Fees are currently represented by 5.5%, but break-even requires realized fees to exceed the position's divergence loss, which can change quickly in a MEMECOIN-family pool.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Fees are currently represented by 5.5%, but break-even requires realized fees to exceed the position's divergence loss, which can change quickly in a MEMECOIN-family pool.
