SOL-DROPon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $81.16K
- APR
- 2.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $205.72 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 2vYBayTB…Hw2C · observed 2026-08-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 gives SOL-DROP a live verdict of EXIT, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates a middle-ground assessment rather than a strong entry signal: the pool ranks #1086 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, but its fee-only economics and low turnover limit the case for allocating capital solely for yield. The assessment would improve with sustained volume and deeper TVL; it would worsen if TVL drains, fee generation collapses, or DROP volatility makes range management and exit execution materially harder.
Computed 2026-08-25 22:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$81.16K
Total value locked
$205.72
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -6.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current SOL-DROP price and set a rebalance or exit rule for when price leaves that range; also reassess the position if 0.00x weakens further or if $81K begins to drain, since fee income is the sole current yield source.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $205.72 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.06 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 SOL-DROP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#830 of 13158 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4598 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-DROP liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DROP into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more weighted toward one token after prices move, and the pool currently has no reward-based payment beyond its trading-fee income.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 2.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the displayed yield comes from fees, so there is no current reward component supporting the APR. The reward schedule and its remaining duration are not established, making emission-based forward projections unreliable.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently inside the active range are not reported, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the available data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-DROP carries substantial price-divergence risk, including rapid repricing and liquidity withdrawal. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because rewards contribute nothing to the displayed APR; exit timing instead depends on fee generation, token momentum, and whether liquidity depth deteriorates before a position can be closed.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool alone provides. SOL price movement changes the relative price of DROP and can push a concentrated LP position outside its active range, producing inventory imbalance and potential impermanent loss.
tollDROP Context
DROP is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and comparable venues than SOL's. A sharp DROP move can create rapid range displacement, while weak demand can reduce swap fees and make exit execution more sensitive to the pool's limited depth.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DROP into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more weighted toward one token after prices move, and the pool currently has no reward-based payment beyond its trading-fee income.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2vYBayTBGeVVaWczuUtaDVKZXy4yJoiDJpffsTHzHw2C
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- DROP (xgC6Vcso…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOL-DROP currently shows 0.0% from rewards and 2.1% from fees, with total APR of 2.1%. Because 99% of yield is fee-derived, emission decay has no current reward contribution to remove, though a future incentive program could change the mix.
SOL-DROP currently shows 0.0% from rewards and 2.1% from fees, with total APR of 2.1%. Because 99% of yield is fee-derived, emission decay has no current reward contribution to remove, though a future incentive program could change the mix.
The current displayed reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not reduce the present reward contribution below its current level. Future returns would depend primarily on 2.1% and whether trading volume supports that fee rate.
The current displayed reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not reduce the present reward contribution below its current level. Future returns would depend primarily on 2.1% and whether trading volume supports that fee rate.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because DROP can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while also reducing fee activity. SOL-DROP has $81K of liquidity and a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio; recent IL and active-range data are not available to quantify the realized exposure.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because DROP can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while also reducing fee activity. SOL-DROP has $81K of liquidity and a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio; recent IL and active-range data are not available to quantify the realized exposure.
Consider exiting when DROP's price leaves your active range, when $81K declines enough to impair execution, or when fee generation no longer justifies rebalancing costs. Because the pool has no current reward contribution, a sustained reduction in volume or 2.1% is a direct deterioration in the position's economics.
Consider exiting when DROP's price leaves your active range, when $81K declines enough to impair execution, or when fee generation no longer justifies rebalancing costs. Because the pool has no current reward contribution, a sustained reduction in volume or 2.1% is a direct deterioration in the position's economics.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and active-range data are not reported. The only stated return source is 2.1%, so recovery would require cumulative trading fees to exceed the position's price-divergence loss, trading costs, and any rebalancing costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and active-range data are not reported. The only stated return source is 2.1%, so recovery would require cumulative trading fees to exceed the position's price-divergence loss, trading costs, and any rebalancing costs.
