new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 39/100 places this pool in a conditional middle ground: the Enter score is 35/100, the Hold score is 45/100, and the Exit score is 35/100, producing the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that existing activity supports retaining exposure more than initiating aggressively, consistent with its #267 of 1834 meteora-damm-v2 pools ranking. A material TVL drain, sustained volume collapse, or sharp reduction in fee APR would weaken that assessment; persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-10-26 17:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$165.43K
Total value locked
$22.33K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up52.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -60.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range you can monitor and rebalance, and treat a sustained drop in observed 24h volume below the pool's TVL as an exit or range-reset trigger because fee generation would then be less supportive of the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 52.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 42.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $22.33K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $179.51 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 EMBER-MET pools
by AI Farmer Score
#238 of 2467 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3603 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the EMBER-MET liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing EMBER and MET into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price changes between the two tokens can leave you holding more of the weaker token than if you had simply held both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 42.3% fee-only APR and 10.3% reward-only APR, with 80% attributed to trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the identifiable source of current yield; realized returns will vary with volume, liquidity, and the time spent in range.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick occupancy are not available for this pool, so the short-term loss profile and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, price divergence between EMBER and MET can be rapid, while volume can contract quickly after speculative interest fades. Any future emissions would be subject to decay, making exit timing important even if fee income remains available.
tollEMBER Context
EMBER is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so its price movement relative to MET determines whether the position earns fees efficiently or accumulates exposure to the weaker-performing asset. Liquidity depth for EMBER elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool data; sharp EMBER moves can increase rebalancing needs and impermanent-loss risk.
tollMET Context
MET is the other side of the pair and provides the reference asset against which EMBER price movement is measured inside the position. Its broader liquidity depth is not established here; a large MET move or a widening EMBER-MET price relationship can push liquidity out of range and change the position's asset mix.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing EMBER and MET into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price changes between the two tokens can leave you holding more of the weaker token than if you had simply held both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2y6PCqa4fEp3jLiFdan9jVMw7LSK8F3gwsTfy8p7traE
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- EMBER (5dvXTZ5q…)
- Token B
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
4%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current yield is represented by 42.3% fee-only APR and 10.3% reward-only APR. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward component would decline, leaving trading fees as the main support for the displayed 52.7% total APR.
The current yield is represented by 42.3% fee-only APR and 10.3% reward-only APR. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward component would decline, leaving trading fees as the main support for the displayed 52.7% total APR.
The current reward component is 10.3%, so there is no identified reward stream supporting the present yield. If incentives are added and later expire, total APR would move toward the fee-only level of 42.3%, while the position would continue depending on trading volume.
The current reward component is 10.3%, so there is no identified reward stream supporting the present yield. If incentives are added and later expire, total APR would move toward the fee-only level of 42.3%, while the position would continue depending on trading volume.
Risk is elevated because EMBER and MET can move sharply relative to each other, and memecoin trading activity can disappear quickly. The pool's current fee output is 42.3%, but that does not offset losses from adverse price divergence or a rapid decline in volume.
Risk is elevated because EMBER and MET can move sharply relative to each other, and memecoin trading activity can disappear quickly. The pool's current fee output is 42.3%, but that does not offset losses from adverse price divergence or a rapid decline in volume.
Consider exiting or resetting the range when volume contracts materially, TVL drains, the pair leaves the active range for an extended period, or fee income no longer compensates for the exposure. For this pool, a sustained decline from the current 0.13x volume-to-TVL ratio would be a relevant warning.
Consider exiting or resetting the range when volume contracts materially, TVL drains, the pair leaves the active range for an extended period, or fee income no longer compensates for the exposure. For this pool, a sustained decline from the current 0.13x volume-to-TVL ratio would be a relevant warning.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy history is unavailable. The relevant offset is realized fee income, currently represented by 42.3%, but actual break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, and time spent in range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy history is unavailable. The relevant offset is realized fee income, currently represented by 42.3%, but actual break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, and time spent in range.
