new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #514 of 2403 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not offset the low activity and memecoin-specific risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume fell enough to reduce 1.3%, rewards disappeared without replacement, or SOBA liquidity worsened; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity would support a stronger view.
Computed 2026-07-27 09:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$48.70K
Total value locked
$315.22
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -22.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: remove liquidity if pool TVL begins a sustained decline or if swap volume weakens while the volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates. Keep the active range centered on current SOL-SOBA prices and rebalance after a sustained move outside the range rather than letting the position remain inactive.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $315.22 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.79 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-soba pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1401 of 36746 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3341 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-soba liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SOBA into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that performed worse, and SOBA may be harder to sell if its market activity fades.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield sourced from fees. Reward duration and lifecycle data are not established, so emission decay cannot be modeled reliably; LPs should not assume the reward component persists. At this APR level, fee flow is the material economic input.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOBA adds token-specific volatility and liquidity-exit risk on top of SOL exposure. Emissions in this pool family can decay, and exit timing should be based on weakening fee flow, shrinking liquidity, or deteriorating SOBA market depth rather than on an assumed long incentive schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than SOBA, which generally makes SOL the more liquid side of the position. If SOL moves materially against SOBA, the AMM rebalances the LP inventory toward the weaker-performing asset, creating impermanent-loss exposure relative to simply holding both tokens. SOL price moves can therefore dominate the pair's inventory changes even when SOBA activity is limited.
tollsoba Context
SOBA is the memecoin side of the pair, and its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp SOBA move can produce large inventory shifts and make withdrawal execution more dependent on available market depth. If SOBA loses liquidity or attention, fee generation and the practical exit price can deteriorate together.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SOBA into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that performed worse, and SOBA may be harder to sell if its market activity fades.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2zjiSTrub1KPtuJzDoRyXcUHFLLC5doUsmStyBi5SjXG
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- soba (25p2BoNp…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
This pool shows 1.3% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, while 99% of yield comes from fees. Because the reward schedule and lifecycle are not established, any emission decay could reduce the reward component without a reliable date-based forecast.
This pool shows 1.3% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, while 99% of yield comes from fees. Because the reward schedule and lifecycle are not established, any emission decay could reduce the reward component without a reliable date-based forecast.
If incentives expire, the reward component represented by 0.0% falls away and the position is left primarily with fee income represented by 1.3%. With 99% of yield already sourced from fees, the key question becomes whether SOL-SOBA trading volume can support that fee return.
If incentives expire, the reward component represented by 0.0% falls away and the position is left primarily with fee income represented by 1.3%. With 99% of yield already sourced from fees, the key question becomes whether SOL-SOBA trading volume can support that fee return.
The risk is material because SOL has deep external liquidity while SOBA's external depth is not established here. Low pool activity relative to $49K can make fee compensation limited, while a sharp SOBA move can increase inventory imbalance, impermanent loss, and exit slippage.
The risk is material because SOL has deep external liquidity while SOBA's external depth is not established here. Low pool activity relative to $49K can make fee compensation limited, while a sharp SOBA move can increase inventory imbalance, impermanent loss, and exit slippage.
For SOL-SOBA, consider exiting when TVL declines persistently, volume weakens, the volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates, or SOBA liquidity becomes difficult to verify. A reward reduction that leaves only 1.3% should also prompt a reassessment of whether the position still compensates for memecoin and inventory risk.
For SOL-SOBA, consider exiting when TVL declines persistently, volume weakens, the volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates, or SOBA liquidity becomes difficult to verify. A reward reduction that leaves only 1.3% should also prompt a reassessment of whether the position still compensates for memecoin and inventory risk.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future SOL-SOBA volume is uncertain. The relevant offset is 1.3% in annualized fee income, so break-even depends on the size and duration of any price divergence as well as whether fee flow persists.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future SOL-SOBA volume is uncertain. The relevant offset is 1.3% in annualized fee income, so break-even depends on the size and duration of any price divergence as well as whether fee flow persists.
