SOL-Tokabuon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $28.87K
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 34T73FF9…Jqxt · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That result is consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #567 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools, so it is not at the extreme bottom of the listed universe, but its zero reported volume and shallow liquidity make the ranking insufficient evidence for entry. The assessment would improve only with sustained trading volume, deeper TVL, a cleared scanner warning, and verifiable range and performance history; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-14 02:00 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$28.87K
Total value locked
$0.00
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
—
fees earned, last 24h
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a deliberately monitored range and set a hard exit rule: close the position if 24h volume remains at $0 or the scanner remains CRITICAL at the next review, rather than waiting for emission decay to determine the exit.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 5 SOL-Tokabu pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1619 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Tokabu liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TOKABU into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You may receive fees, but with no reported trading activity, the displayed return may not be realized, and changes in the two token prices can leave you holding more of the weaker token.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, for a total of 0.0%. 0% of yield comes from trading fees, while reward dependency is unknown; with no current reward contribution represented in the displayed APR, LPs should not assume emissions will improve realized returns. For this MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as subject to decay and should not determine an open-ended holding period.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so recent price divergence between SOL and TOKABU cannot be quantified from the supplied history. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving the portion of the position earning fees unverified. The MEMECOIN classification adds token-specific liquidity and price-dislocation risk; emission decay and uncertain incentives make exit timing more important, particularly when trading activity is absent.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established base asset in this pair and has substantially broader liquidity across Solana venues than TOKABU. SOL price moves against TOKABU change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. That external liquidity may make SOL easier to trade, but it does not remove pair-level risk.
tollTokabu Context
TOKABU is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp TOKABU move against SOL can shift the LP position toward the falling asset and increase the cost of exiting. Weak or absent trading activity also makes fee generation and execution quality less dependable.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TOKABU into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You may receive fees, but with no reported trading activity, the displayed return may not be realized, and changes in the two token prices can leave you holding more of the weaker token.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 34T73FF9Ewh8GWf9Jh5k1yJ81PvVefjcqKsrqsefJqxt
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Tokabu (H8xQ6poB…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 0.0%, split between 0.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 0% from fees. Because reward dependency is unknown and the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be assumed to decay unless renewed; the fee component depends on trading activity, currently reported as $0.
The current total APR is 0.0%, split between 0.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 0% from fees. Because reward dependency is unknown and the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be assumed to decay unless renewed; the fee component depends on trading activity, currently reported as $0.
There is no current reward contribution beyond 0.0% in the displayed APR, so incentive expiry would not remove an active reward stream from the present calculation. After expiry, returns would rely on trading fees, which are 0.0%, while the pool reports $0 in 24h volume.
There is no current reward contribution beyond 0.0% in the displayed APR, so incentive expiry would not remove an active reward stream from the present calculation. After expiry, returns would rely on trading fees, which are 0.0%, while the pool reports $0 in 24h volume.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with two established assets because TOKABU can move sharply, liquidity can thin, and the pool reports $29K with $0 in 24h volume. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the pair's realized price and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with two established assets because TOKABU can move sharply, liquidity can thin, and the pool reports $29K with $0 in 24h volume. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the pair's realized price and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data.
For this pool, an exit rule should respond to persistent zero activity, a TVL drain, a worsening scanner status, or collapsing fee generation rather than waiting for rewards. The live verdict is EXIT, and continued absence of volume at $0 supports closing or not entering unless the pool's activity and risk signals improve.
For this pool, an exit rule should respond to persistent zero activity, a TVL drain, a worsening scanner status, or collapsing fee generation rather than waiting for rewards. The live verdict is EXIT, and continued absence of volume at $0 supports closing or not entering unless the pool's activity and risk signals improve.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and reported 24h volume is $0. The displayed 0.0% is an annualized indication, not a promise of realized fees, so price divergence between SOL and TOKABU could make fee recovery take much longer or never occur.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and reported 24h volume is $0. The displayed 0.0% is an annualized indication, not a promise of realized fees, so price divergence between SOL and TOKABU could make fee recovery take much longer or never occur.
