new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 57/100 with Enter 54/100, Hold 60/100, and Exit 23/100 places QNTM-SOL near the exit side of its decision framework. The live verdict is HOLD; ai_engine indicates hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools indicates that it sits well below the strongest portion of the tracked pool set, although rank alone is not a safety measure. The assessment would improve if the scanner ceased being critical, liquidity and volume became more persistent, or fee generation strengthened without relying on emissions; a TVL drain, yield collapse, or worsening execution conditions would reinforce the exit view.
Computed 2026-11-09 22:26 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$30.56K
Total value locked
$39.31
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -30.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal as the entry filter: do not enter while that signal persists, and exit if it remains active alongside falling TVL or weakening swap volume rather than waiting for a precise tick-range signal that is not currently available.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $39.31 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.10 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 QNTM-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14017 of 97331 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20111 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the QNTM-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing QNTM and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding QNTM and SOL if their prices move apart, especially because QNTM is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR of 0.3% decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.3% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the yield depends on continued swap activity rather than token emissions. Reward dependency and any reward-duration schedule are not established, so the fee component is the only clearly identifiable source of return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, QNTM-SOL is exposed to sharp QNTM price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and rapid changes in swap activity; emission decay matters because any future incentive contribution can diminish, while exit timing matters if trading volume or available liquidity contracts.
tollQNTM Context
QNTM is the memecoin-side asset in this pool, so an LP holds QNTM exposure indirectly while supplying liquidity against SOL. QNTM liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here; a sharp QNTM move can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while thin external liquidity can make exiting the LP position more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the paired asset and provides the pool's more established market reference, but SOL price changes still affect the relative value of the two assets held by the LP. The relevant comparison is QNTM against SOL, not QNTM against fiat: QNTM underperformance can leave the LP with more QNTM, while a strong QNTM move can reduce the pool's QNTM inventory.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing QNTM and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding QNTM and SOL if their prices move apart, especially because QNTM is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 39YeFEZ5n3TueXLj8KzQghUqKGvrxCCgttELsmkWx8bq
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- QNTM (qntmuw54…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
17%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward-only component is 0.0%, while the fee-only component is 0.3%. Because the stated yield is fee-funded, emission decay has no identified current contribution, but any future incentives would decline as their schedule progresses.
The reward-only component is 0.0%, while the fee-only component is 0.3%. Because the stated yield is fee-funded, emission decay has no identified current contribution, but any future incentives would decline as their schedule progresses.
The pool would retain only trading-fee income, represented by 0.3%, rather than reward income represented by 0.0%. With no established reward duration and a 0.00x turnover ratio, post-incentive returns would depend directly on continued swap volume.
The pool would retain only trading-fee income, represented by 0.3%, rather than reward income represented by 0.0%. With no established reward duration and a 0.00x turnover ratio, post-incentive returns would depend directly on continued swap volume.
Risk is high because QNTM can move sharply against SOL, external liquidity depth is not established, and the pool has a HOLD verdict with a 57/100. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range records are unavailable, so those risks cannot be bounded from the supplied history.
Risk is high because QNTM can move sharply against SOL, external liquidity depth is not established, and the pool has a HOLD verdict with a 57/100. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range records are unavailable, so those risks cannot be bounded from the supplied history.
For QNTM-SOL, the current exit condition is the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal, particularly if TVL or volume declines. An LP should also reassess when QNTM's price move leaves the position materially imbalanced against SOL or when fee income no longer compensates for the risk.
For QNTM-SOL, the current exit condition is the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal, particularly if TVL or volume declines. An LP should also reassess when QNTM's price move leaves the position materially imbalanced against SOL or when fee income no longer compensates for the risk.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The fee-only return is 0.3%, but actual recovery depends on realized fees, QNTM-SOL price divergence, and exit execution.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The fee-only return is 0.3%, but actual recovery depends on realized fees, QNTM-SOL price divergence, and exit execution.
