SOL-DJTon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $440.63K
- APR
- 0.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $903.50 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 3B5vXBEY…4Ao2 · observed 2026-09-13
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns this pool a Hold verdict of EXIT, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The ai_engine=hold driver implies that the current balance of fee income, liquidity, and pool risk does not justify a clear entry or exit signal. Its rank of #1041 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it well below the strongest pools, despite the fee-funded structure. A material TVL drain, further fee-yield collapse, worsening DJT liquidity, or evidence that rewards were required to sustain activity would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-09-07 15:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$440.63K
Total value locked
$903.50
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current SOL-DJT price, review it whenever price approaches either boundary, and exit rather than widen the range if pool volume or TVL deteriorates materially; widening converts a visible range breach into prolonged exposure to DJT's downside.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $903.50 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $9.03 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 8 SOL-DJT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1064 of 16258 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5534 of 113637
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-DJT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DJT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in one token after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only component of 0.7% and a reward component of 0.0%. 0% indicates that the reported yield is currently sourced from trading fees, not listed rewards. Reward dependency remains unverified, so the fee component is the relevant basis for assessing persistence; no duration for rewards is established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so there is no measured short-term loss path to use for sizing or break-even analysis. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving the effect of range placement and time spent inactive unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-DJT carries sharp price-gap, liquidity-withdrawal, and emission-decay risks; LPs should assume exit timing can matter more than the annualized fee figure when DJT demand weakens.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a single SOL-DJT pool. SOL price movement changes the relative price between the two assets; a large move against DJT can create impermanent loss even when the position continues collecting fees. SOL's broader liquidity may make the SOL side easier to hedge or exit, but it does not remove pool-specific range risk.
tollDJT Context
DJT is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery may be more concentrated and less resilient than SOL's across Solana markets. A rapid DJT move can push the position toward one-sided inventory and increase impermanent loss, while a fall in DJT trading activity reduces fee generation. Any exit decision should account for the possibility that available liquidity deteriorates during the same move that creates the loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DJT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in one token after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3B5vXBEYAmV8y13pgvzSi7eLDFS5tRd4pZZZPNuA4Ao2
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- DJT (HRw8mqK8…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.7% and fee sustainability is 0%. If any unverified emissions decay, the reward portion can fall further, leaving the total APR increasingly dependent on SOL-DJT trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.7% and fee sustainability is 0%. If any unverified emissions decay, the reward portion can fall further, leaving the total APR increasingly dependent on SOL-DJT trading volume.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward portion would disappear or decline, while fee income would remain tied to trading activity. With current total APR at 0.7% and reward APR at 0.0%, the pool's stated yield is already fee-led rather than reward-led.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward portion would disappear or decline, while fee income would remain tied to trading activity. With current total APR at 0.7% and reward APR at 0.0%, the pool's stated yield is already fee-led rather than reward-led.
Risk is elevated because DJT can move sharply and its liquidity may be thinner than SOL's, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss. The pool has $441K of liquidity, $903 of recent volume, and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.00x, so fee generation is not evidence that exit liquidity will remain strong.
Risk is elevated because DJT can move sharply and its liquidity may be thinner than SOL's, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss. The pool has $441K of liquidity, $903 of recent volume, and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.00x, so fee generation is not evidence that exit liquidity will remain strong.
Consider exiting when DJT liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when price repeatedly reaches the edge of your range, or when fee income no longer compensates for holding risk. For SOL-DJT, a TVL drain, weaker volume, or a worsening score would be more relevant exit signals than the headline APR alone.
Consider exiting when DJT liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when price repeatedly reaches the edge of your range, or when fee income no longer compensates for holding risk. For SOL-DJT, a TVL drain, weaker volume, or a worsening score would be more relevant exit signals than the headline APR alone.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. 0.7% is an annualized estimate, not a guaranteed recovery rate; actual break-even depends on realized fees, SOL-DJT price divergence, and how long the position remains in range.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. 0.7% is an annualized estimate, not a guaranteed recovery rate; actual break-even depends on realized fees, SOL-DJT price divergence, and how long the position remains in range.
