Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, Exit at 60/100, and a live verdict of AVOID. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the current balance of fee generation, liquidity, and risk does not justify a clear entry or exit signal. Its rank of #1908 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it within the evaluated universe but does not establish safety or depth; a material TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment, while durable fee flow with stable liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$3.63K
Total value locked
$375.61
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up15.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -90.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined fee-yield threshold: monitor realized fee APR and pool TVL, and exit if fee APR remains below your threshold for two consecutive observations or if TVL shows a sustained drain; this pool has no demonstrated reward buffer to offset weaker trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 15.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 14.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $375.61 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.94 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 HMASK-GP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3867 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8041 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the HMASK-GP liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing HMASK and GP into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and a lower result than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated return decomposes into a fee-only APR of 14.4% and a reward-only APR of 1.1%. Fee sustainability is 93%, so the yield case depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward duration and dependency are not established, which limits confidence in any forward APR beyond the current fee flow.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-in-range history are not available, so recent divergence and range behavior cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a memecoin pool, HMASK-GP carries elevated price-gap, liquidity-withdrawal, and correlation-break risk; emission decay is relevant if incentives are later introduced, and exit timing should account for the possibility that fee flow falls before liquidity recovers.
tollHMASK Context
HMASK is one side of this LP position and gives the pool direct exposure to HMASK price moves against GP. Its liquidity depth outside HMASK-GP is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp HMASK move may produce wider execution costs and a larger inventory imbalance. HMASK appreciation or depreciation relative to GP changes the mix of assets held by the LP and can create impermanent loss.
tollGP Context
GP is the counter-asset paired with HMASK, so its price movement determines whether the pool's inventory shift is driven by HMASK, GP, or both. Liquidity depth for GP elsewhere is not established by the supplied metrics. A GP move against HMASK can leave the LP holding more of the depreciating side after arbitrage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing HMASK and GP into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and a lower result than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3CBLi1wCzzCJ9azB8vdpJByHPzokQt6BFCAsDShP5Ro1
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- HMASK (EPJQWq9A…)
- Token B
- GP (HTmQz7My…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 1.1%, while fee-only APR is 14.4%. Because the stated yield is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently appear to be the main APR driver, although future incentives could change that mix.
The current reward-only APR is 1.1%, while fee-only APR is 14.4%. Because the stated yield is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently appear to be the main APR driver, although future incentives could change that mix.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining return would depend on 14.4% from trading fees. The stated fee sustainability is 93%, but lower trading activity could reduce that fee income.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining return would depend on 14.4% from trading fees. The stated fee sustainability is 93%, but lower trading activity could reduce that fee income.
Risk is high relative to a more established token pair because HMASK and GP may experience abrupt price moves, shallow liquidity, and weak correlation. The pool's fee-based yield does not remove impermanent loss or the risk of a TVL drain.
Risk is high relative to a more established token pair because HMASK and GP may experience abrupt price moves, shallow liquidity, and weak correlation. The pool's fee-based yield does not remove impermanent loss or the risk of a TVL drain.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a sharp token move: consider exiting when fee APR stays below your required threshold, TVL drains materially, or one token's liquidity deteriorates. For HMASK-GP, the absence of a demonstrated reward cushion makes declining fee flow an especially relevant signal.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a sharp token move: consider exiting when fee APR stays below your required threshold, TVL drains materially, or one token's liquidity deteriorates. For HMASK-GP, the absence of a demonstrated reward cushion makes declining fee flow an especially relevant signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Gross fee accrual is represented by 14.4%, but actual break-even depends on the size and persistence of HMASK-GP price divergence, withdrawals, and execution costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Gross fee accrual is represented by 14.4%, but actual break-even depends on the size and persistence of HMASK-GP price divergence, withdrawals, and execution costs.
