new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 46/100 with Enter 39/100, Hold 56/100, and Exit 24/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented zone. The live verdict is HOLD: the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine reads hold, and the strong exit signal is unopposed. Its rank of #2192 among 18146 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked set, consistent with low TVL, low turnover, and no reward contribution. The assessment would change if sustained volume increased fee generation, TVL deepened without a corresponding volume collapse, or the critical scanner signal cleared; a TVL drain or yield collapse would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-08 23:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$21.74K
Total value locked
$295.47
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -69.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range only with active monitoring and set an exit trigger for a material TVL drain, continued critical scanner status, or a further deterioration in trading volume; do not treat the current APR as compensation for passive exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $295.47 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.74 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-MANLET pools
by AI Farmer Score
#736 of 80377 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #956 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-MANLET liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MANLET into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change relative to simply holding the two tokens, and the current return is mainly fee-based.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR decomposes into 0.3% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 100% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution to offset weak volume. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied pool data, and no time-bound reward schedule is available to support an emissions-based holding assumption.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-MANLET carries MANLET-specific price and liquidity risk alongside SOL exposure; emission decay matters because any future incentives can fall before trading activity improves. Exit timing should therefore be based on liquidity, volume, and incentive changes rather than assuming a persistent APR.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single memecoin pool. For this LP, a SOL price move relative to MANLET changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollMANLET Context
MANLET is the pool's memecoin leg, so its price discovery and liquidity conditions are central to the position's risk. Its standalone liquidity depth outside SOL-MANLET is not established by the supplied data; a sharp MANLET move or thin exit liquidity can increase rebalancing costs and impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MANLET into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change relative to simply holding the two tokens, and the current return is mainly fee-based.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3Cs7o8MfS6QfbS4RHZ6tT5sJuzA2xeobQPqD19jmzvAr
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- MANLET (5HvxUFGR…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
20%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
29%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.3% and fee-only APR is 0.3%. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward portion would change, but the supplied data does not establish a live reward schedule for this pool.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.3% and fee-only APR is 0.3%. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, the reward portion would change, but the supplied data does not establish a live reward schedule for this pool.
With reward-only APR at 0.0%, the stated return already comes entirely from fees, reflected by 100% fee sustainability. If incentives are added and later expire, the pool would depend on trading fees; at current volume, that would not establish a strong yield case.
With reward-only APR at 0.0%, the stated return already comes entirely from fees, reflected by 100% fee sustainability. If incentives are added and later expire, the pool would depend on trading fees; at current volume, that would not establish a strong yield case.
Risk is elevated because MANLET can move sharply against SOL, while this pool has TVL of $22K and 24-hour volume of $295. The missing recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history prevents a precise estimate of recent LP damage, so the position should be treated as actively managed rather than passive.
Risk is elevated because MANLET can move sharply against SOL, while this pool has TVL of $22K and 24-hour volume of $295. The missing recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history prevents a precise estimate of recent LP damage, so the position should be treated as actively managed rather than passive.
For SOL-MANLET, an exit is consistent with the live verdict HOLD, the CRITICAL scanner result, and the unopposed strong exit signal. A further TVL drain, declining volume, weaker fee generation, or worsening price divergence would reinforce that decision; clearing the scanner signal and sustaining higher activity would be evidence to reassess.
For SOL-MANLET, an exit is consistent with the live verdict HOLD, the CRITICAL scanner result, and the unopposed strong exit signal. A further TVL drain, declining volume, weaker fee generation, or worsening price divergence would reinforce that decision; clearing the scanner signal and sustaining higher activity would be evidence to reassess.
There is no defensible pool-specific break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on future volume. At a constant fee-only APR of 0.3%, a simple no-IL estimate would be roughly 100 divided by 0.3% years when the APR is expressed as a percentage, but actual recovery could be slower or impossible.
There is no defensible pool-specific break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on future volume. At a constant fee-only APR of 0.3%, a simple no-IL estimate would be roughly 100 divided by 0.3% years when the APR is expressed as a percentage, but actual recovery could be slower or impossible.
