
NOS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $466.56K
- APR
- 41.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $111.10K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.40% fee
- Pool address
- 3GkFzURG…iVQk · observed 2026-09-07
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 57/100 places this pool in a middle band rather than signaling a clear entry. Enter 51/100 is weaker than Hold 64/100, while Exit 17/100 is notably lower, producing the live verdict HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. The pool is ranked #110 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, which indicates a relatively strong position within this venue but does not remove memecoin or range risks. The assessment would change if TVL drains, trading volume falls, fee APR collapses, or a reward program introduces meaningful dependency; sustained volume and fee income would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-09-06 23:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$466.56K
Total value locked
$111.10K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up41.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 19.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a two-sided concentrated range around the current NOS/USDC price, remove liquidity whenever price exits the range, and reassess before redeploying if the rolling volume-to-TVL ratio falls materially below 0.24x for several consecutive sessions.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 41.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 34.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $111.10K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $444.42 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 6 NOS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#272 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1728 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NOS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a sharp NOS price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Displayed yield decomposes into 34.7% fee APR and 6.8% reward APR. Fee sustainability is 84%, so the return profile depends on continued NOS-USDC trading volume and the pool's fee parameters rather than a disclosed reward runway. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry horizon is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized range performance cannot be validated from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, NOS-USDC carries high token-specific volatility, adverse selection, and liquidity-concentration risk; any future emission program could decay and alter the economics, making exit timing important if volume or liquidity deteriorates. Fee income can offset price divergence only while trading activity persists.
tollNOS Context
NOS is the volatile asset in the NOS-USDC pair, so changes in NOS price determine much of the position's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for NOS elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; thin external liquidity or abrupt NOS price moves could make rebalancing and exiting more costly.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable quote asset and supplies the relatively stable side of the pair. Its role limits directional exposure on one side, but it does not remove the risk created by NOS price movement or establish how much USDC liquidity is available elsewhere for exit execution.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a sharp NOS price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3GkFzURGWNWyErnjQvnkZpgcLnNocjnRwvMYXiVDiVQk
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- NOS (nosXBVoa…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 6.8%, while fee income is 34.7%, so emission decay is not the main source of the displayed APR. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component and increase reliance on trading fees.
The current reward component is 6.8%, while fee income is 34.7%, so emission decay is not the main source of the displayed APR. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component and increase reliance on trading fees.
On the supplied data, the displayed return is driven by 34.7% fee APR and 6.8% reward APR, with fee sustainability of 84%. If a future incentive program expires, only its reward component would fall; the remaining economics would depend on NOS-USDC trading volume and fees.
On the supplied data, the displayed return is driven by 34.7% fee APR and 6.8% reward APR, with fee sustainability of 84%. If a future incentive program expires, only its reward component would fall; the remaining economics would depend on NOS-USDC trading volume and fees.
Risk is materially tied to NOS volatility, liquidity conditions, and the possibility of adverse price movement while your position is in range. The pool has $467K of liquidity and 0.24x volume-to-TVL, but recent impermanent-loss and range-performance readings are unavailable.
Risk is materially tied to NOS volatility, liquidity conditions, and the possibility of adverse price movement while your position is in range. The pool has $467K of liquidity and 0.24x volume-to-TVL, but recent impermanent-loss and range-performance readings are unavailable.
Consider exiting when NOS price leaves your selected range, when trading volume or fee income deteriorates, or when pool liquidity begins draining. A sustained decline from 0.24x in volume-to-TVL or a collapse in 34.7% would weaken the case for remaining exposed.
Consider exiting when NOS price leaves your selected range, when trading volume or fee income deteriorates, or when pool liquidity begins draining. A sustained decline from 0.24x in volume-to-TVL or a collapse in 34.7% would weaken the case for remaining exposed.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. In principle, fee income at 34.7% must persist long enough to offset the position's path-dependent loss relative to holding NOS and USDC separately.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. In principle, fee income at 34.7% must persist long enough to offset the position's path-dependent loss relative to holding NOS and USDC separately.




