WealthVille
NOS
N
USDC
U

NOS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $466.56K
APR
41.5% APR
24h Volume
$111.10K 24h vol
Fee tier
0.40% fee
Pool address
3GkFzURGiVQk · observed 2026-09-07
57C · Fair

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 53% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter51

new capital

Hold64

keep position

Exit17

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 57/100 places this pool in a middle band rather than signaling a clear entry. Enter 51/100 is weaker than Hold 64/100, while Exit 17/100 is notably lower, producing the live verdict HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. The pool is ranked #110 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, which indicates a relatively strong position within this venue but does not remove memecoin or range risks. The assessment would change if TVL drains, trading volume falls, fee APR collapses, or a reward program introduces meaningful dependency; sustained volume and fee income would support the current hold view.

Computed 2026-09-06 23:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$466.56K

Total value locked

$111.10K

24h volume

×0.2 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

41.5%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

19.7%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.40% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 5m agoTVL 1.4%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 84% of APR from trading fees
tips_and_updates

Use a two-sided concentrated range around the current NOS/USDC price, remove liquidity whenever price exits the range, and reassess before redeploying if the rolling volume-to-TVL ratio falls materially below 0.24x for several consecutive sessions.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR41.5%
Fee APR34.7%
Volume$111.10K
Fees Earned$444.42

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
21.0%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−1.2%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
19.7%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.24x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0010
Fee APR Sustainability
84% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 6 NOS-USDC pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#272 of 14926 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1728 of 107256

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NOS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a sharp NOS price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Displayed yield decomposes into 34.7% fee APR and 6.8% reward APR. Fee sustainability is 84%, so the return profile depends on continued NOS-USDC trading volume and the pool's fee parameters rather than a disclosed reward runway. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry horizon is available.

shieldRisk Assessment

A usable recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized range performance cannot be validated from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, NOS-USDC carries high token-specific volatility, adverse selection, and liquidity-concentration risk; any future emission program could decay and alter the economics, making exit timing important if volume or liquidity deteriorates. Fee income can offset price divergence only while trading activity persists.

tollNOS Context

NOS is the volatile asset in the NOS-USDC pair, so changes in NOS price determine much of the position's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for NOS elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; thin external liquidity or abrupt NOS price moves could make rebalancing and exiting more costly.

tollUSDC Context

USDC is the stable quote asset and supplies the relatively stable side of the pair. Its role limits directional exposure on one side, but it does not remove the risk created by NOS price movement or establish how much USDC liquidity is available elsewhere for exit execution.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing NOS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a sharp NOS price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.

token

Token Details

NOS
NOSNosanaSolana
Explorer

Nosana (NOS) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

USDC
USDCUSD CoinSolana

USDC is a fully collateralized US dollar stablecoin. USDC is the bridge between dollars and trading on exchanges.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
3GkFzURGWNWyErnjQvnkZpgcLnNocjnRwvMYXiVDiVQk
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
NOS (nosXBVoa…)
Token B
USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
Created
4/20/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward component is 6.8%, while fee income is 34.7%, so emission decay is not the main source of the displayed APR. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component and increase reliance on trading fees.

The current reward component is 6.8%, while fee income is 34.7%, so emission decay is not the main source of the displayed APR. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component and increase reliance on trading fees.

On the supplied data, the displayed return is driven by 34.7% fee APR and 6.8% reward APR, with fee sustainability of 84%. If a future incentive program expires, only its reward component would fall; the remaining economics would depend on NOS-USDC trading volume and fees.

On the supplied data, the displayed return is driven by 34.7% fee APR and 6.8% reward APR, with fee sustainability of 84%. If a future incentive program expires, only its reward component would fall; the remaining economics would depend on NOS-USDC trading volume and fees.

Risk is materially tied to NOS volatility, liquidity conditions, and the possibility of adverse price movement while your position is in range. The pool has $467K of liquidity and 0.24x volume-to-TVL, but recent impermanent-loss and range-performance readings are unavailable.

Risk is materially tied to NOS volatility, liquidity conditions, and the possibility of adverse price movement while your position is in range. The pool has $467K of liquidity and 0.24x volume-to-TVL, but recent impermanent-loss and range-performance readings are unavailable.

Consider exiting when NOS price leaves your selected range, when trading volume or fee income deteriorates, or when pool liquidity begins draining. A sustained decline from 0.24x in volume-to-TVL or a collapse in 34.7% would weaken the case for remaining exposed.

Consider exiting when NOS price leaves your selected range, when trading volume or fee income deteriorates, or when pool liquidity begins draining. A sustained decline from 0.24x in volume-to-TVL or a collapse in 34.7% would weaken the case for remaining exposed.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. In principle, fee income at 34.7% must persist long enough to offset the position's path-dependent loss relative to holding NOS and USDC separately.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. In principle, fee income at 34.7% must persist long enough to offset the position's path-dependent loss relative to holding NOS and USDC separately.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights