SOL-neeton Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $94.38K
- APR
- 9.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $26.90K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.10% fee
- Pool address
- 3Sht4Amo…s6tN · observed 2026-10-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 46/100 with Enter 40/100, Hold 53/100, and Exit 27/100 supports a selective hold rather than an unqualified new entry. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1254 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, placing it above many pools but not among the highest-ranked set. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume fell, fee APR collapsed, the active range became persistently ineffective, or new emissions created a short-lived APR spike that decayed quickly.
Computed 2026-10-22 21:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$94.38K
Total value locked
$26.90K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up9.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 13.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor and set an alert for either boundary; rebalance or exit when the position leaves range. Also reassess if the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio falls materially below its current 0.29x level for several sessions, since fee income would then be less able to offset memecoin divergence.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 9.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 9.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $26.90K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $26.90 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 9 SOL-neet pools
by AI Farmer Score
#853 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4650 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-neet liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NEET into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price difference between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, especially because NEET is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 9.2% from trading fees and 0.4% from rewards. 95% means the current yield is fee-funded rather than dependent on emissions. Reward dependency is not established, so prospective LPs should not assume that the fee rate will persist or that future incentives will compensate for weaker trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not currently reported, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. This is a memecoin pool: SOL and NEET can diverge sharply, pushing a concentrated position out of range and leaving the LP with more of the weaker asset. Emission decay is also an exit-timing consideration if incentives are introduced later; an LP should reassess when trading fees weaken, the position approaches a range boundary, or the memecoin's liquidity deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than NEET. SOL price moves relative to NEET determine the pool's inventory shift and can create impermanent loss even when the pool continues generating fees. A large SOL move can therefore make fee income insufficient to offset inventory divergence.
tollneet Context
NEET is the less liquid memecoin leg, so its price discovery and exit liquidity are more likely to be concentrated in a small number of venues. A sharp NEET move can push the position out of its active range or leave the LP holding disproportionately more NEET after arbitrage. The practical risk is not only price volatility but also the ability to exit that inventory without substantial slippage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NEET into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price difference between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, especially because NEET is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3Sht4Amox5REC1YLYGuR1Qdfh7fa8d2ucGu4rawjs6tN
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- neet (Ce2gx9KG…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.4%, while fee income is 9.2%, so the stated yield is presently fee-driven. If emissions are added later, decay could reduce the reward component and pull total APR below 9.7% even if trading activity is unchanged.
The current reward component is 0.4%, while fee income is 9.2%, so the stated yield is presently fee-driven. If emissions are added later, decay could reduce the reward component and pull total APR below 9.7% even if trading activity is unchanged.
Because the current reward APR is 0.4%, there is no current incentive component to remove from the stated yield. If incentives are introduced and later expire, total APR would depend primarily on 9.2% and could fall if trading volume also declines.
Because the current reward APR is 0.4%, there is no current incentive component to remove from the stated yield. If incentives are introduced and later expire, total APR would depend primarily on 9.2% and could fall if trading volume also declines.
Risk is high relative to a pool using two deeper-liquidity assets because NEET can move sharply and may be harder to sell. The pool has $94K of liquidity and a 0.29x volume-to-TVL ratio, but those figures do not remove impermanent loss or concentrated-range risk.
Risk is high relative to a pool using two deeper-liquidity assets because NEET can move sharply and may be harder to sell. The pool has $94K of liquidity and a 0.29x volume-to-TVL ratio, but those figures do not remove impermanent loss or concentrated-range risk.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its active range, when fee generation weakens materially, or when the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates from 0.29x. A sustained TVL drain or a shift away from the current HOLD assessment would also warrant reassessment.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its active range, when fee generation weakens materially, or when the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates from 0.29x. A sustained TVL drain or a shift away from the current HOLD assessment would also warrant reassessment.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not currently reported. In principle, fees accruing at 9.2% could offset price divergence over time, but the result depends on future volume, SOL-NEET volatility, and how long the position remains in range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not currently reported. In principle, fees accruing at 9.2% could offset price divergence over time, but the result depends on future volume, SOL-NEET volatility, and how long the position remains in range.
