WealthVille
Bonk
B
USDC
U

Bonk-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $129.11K
APR
17.8% APR
24h Volume
$40.68K 24h vol
Fee tier
0.15% fee
Pool address
3UwfrdLT2Noc · observed 2026-09-16
48D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 55% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter41

new capital

Hold56

keep position

Exit24

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 48/100, with Enter at 41/100, Hold at 56/100, and Exit at 24/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #539 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools, this is a middle-ranked pool rather than a top-ranked fee opportunity. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-only income and a small liquidity base: a TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in fee APR would shift the assessment toward exit, while durable volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.

Computed 2026-09-16 22:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$129.11K

Total value locked

$40.68K

24h volume

×0.3 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

17.8%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

24.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.15% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 32m agoTVL 8.1%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 92% of APR from trading fees
tips_and_updates

Use a range wide enough to tolerate ordinary BONK volatility, monitor whether the position remains in range, and reassess or exit promptly when price leaves the range or fee volume weakens materially relative to $129K.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR17.8%
Fee APR16.4%
Volume$40.68K
Fees Earned$61.02

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
26.2%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−1.8%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
24.5%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.32x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0005
Fee APR Sustainability
92% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#4 of 23 Bonk-USDC pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#889 of 16780 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 7% of all Solana pools

overall rank #7197 of 116409

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the Bonk-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing BONK and USDC into a range so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large BONK price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and less value than simply holding them.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The stated APR decomposes into 16.4% from trading fees and 1.4% from rewards. 92% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward stream contributing to the quoted APR. The supplied data does not establish whether the pool has meaningful ongoing reward dependency; fee income can fall quickly if BONK volume declines.

shieldRisk Assessment

A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not reported, so the historical cost of BONK price divergence cannot be quantified from this sheet. Seven-day tick-in-range utilization is also not reported, leaving the chance of becoming one-sided or inactive inside the chosen range unresolved. As a MEMECOIN pool, BONK can experience abrupt price moves and liquidity withdrawal; emission decay is not a current APR driver because reward APR is zero, but exit timing matters if trading activity or available liquidity deteriorates.

tollBonk Context

BONK is the volatile asset in this pair, while the pool's measured depth for it is $129K. Liquidity depth elsewhere is venue-dependent and should be checked separately; a BONK price move changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when the position is rebalanced against USDC.

tollUSDC Context

USDC is the quote and relatively stable side of the pair, providing the accounting reference for BONK's price. Its available liquidity elsewhere varies by venue, while USDC price stability means most directional exposure in this pool comes from BONK; sharp BONK moves can therefore leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing BONK and USDC into a range so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large BONK price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and less value than simply holding them.

token

Token Details

Bonk
BonkSolana
Explorer

Bonk is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

USDC
USDCUSD CoinSolana

USDC is a fully collateralized US dollar stablecoin. USDC is the bridge between dollars and trading on exchanges.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
3UwfrdLTpAjxTRni1boc5HUWe6hzc4HgE5yLdvEp2Noc
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
Bonk (DezXAZ8z…)
Token B
USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
Created
4/20/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

There is currently no reward contribution: 1.4% of the quoted 17.8% APR comes from rewards, while 16.4% comes from fees. Emission decay therefore is not reducing the current reward APR, but future incentives would need separate monitoring if introduced.

There is currently no reward contribution: 1.4% of the quoted 17.8% APR comes from rewards, while 16.4% comes from fees. Emission decay therefore is not reducing the current reward APR, but future incentives would need separate monitoring if introduced.

The current reward APR is already 1.4%, so expiry would not remove a current reward component from the quoted 17.8% APR. LP income would remain dependent on trading fees of 16.4%, which can decline if BONK volume falls.

The current reward APR is already 1.4%, so expiry would not remove a current reward component from the quoted 17.8% APR. LP income would remain dependent on trading fees of 16.4%, which can decline if BONK volume falls.

Risk is elevated because BONK can move sharply and the pool has $129K in liquidity against $41K of daily volume. The recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported, so the size and frequency of those effects cannot be estimated here.

Risk is elevated because BONK can move sharply and the pool has $129K in liquidity against $41K of daily volume. The recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported, so the size and frequency of those effects cannot be estimated here.

For this pool, reassess when price leaves your range, when fee volume no longer supports 16.4%, or when liquidity drains from $129K. Because the pool has no current reward APR, there is no separate incentive stream that justifies remaining after fee activity weakens.

For this pool, reassess when price leaves your range, when fee volume no longer supports 16.4%, or when liquidity drains from $129K. Because the pool has no current reward APR, there is no separate incentive stream that justifies remaining after fee activity weakens.

A rough gross comparison at 16.4% suggests about a year of fee income to equal the original position value, but that is not a reliable impermanent-loss break-even estimate. Without a reported seven-day impermanent-loss figure, BONK price divergence, range placement, and future fee volume determine the actual result.

A rough gross comparison at 16.4% suggests about a year of fee income to equal the original position value, but that is not a reliable impermanent-loss break-even estimate. Without a reported seven-day impermanent-loss figure, BONK price divergence, range placement, and future fee volume determine the actual result.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights