Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 45% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 46/100, with Enter 40/100, Hold 53/100, and Exit 50/100; the live verdict is REDUCE. That outcome is consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so its position is weak relative to the tracked set. The assessment would improve only with sustained trading volume relative to TVL, stable or growing liquidity, clearer reward support, and removal of the critical scanner signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-19 11:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$70.09K
Total value locked
$1.32
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal as the entry-risk trigger: do not enter unless you can monitor the position and exit promptly when volume remains weak, TVL drains, or the scanner signal persists; use a narrow, actively managed range rather than passive broad exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.32 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 $PELF-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the $PELF-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both $PELF and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You may receive a small fee return, but a sharp $PELF price move can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had held them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of the displayed yield comes from trading fees, so the current return depends mainly on actual swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established; any future emission decay or incentive removal would reduce the reward component, while the low recent volume limits the fee base.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, $PELF exposure carries sharp price-move and liquidity-contraction risk, and emission decay can reduce incentives before trading activity improves. Exit timing matters because a falling token price, shrinking liquidity base, or persistent lack of swaps can leave LP returns dependent on fees that are too small to offset inventory divergence.
toll$PELF Context
$PELF is the memecoin side of this pool, so LPs hold exposure to its price relative to SOL rather than simply earning fees on a dollar balance. Liquidity depth for $PELF elsewhere is not established here; a rapid move in $PELF can change the pool's inventory mix and create impermanent loss even when the fee APR remains positive.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against $PELF and provides the reference price for the pool's relative movement. SOL price changes affect the pair's balance and the value of the SOL inventory, while the depth of SOL liquidity elsewhere can influence how quickly arbitrageurs reprice the pool.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both $PELF and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You may receive a small fee return, but a sharp $PELF price move can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had held them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3aWbwSYYMa4kqVst5se2krwc2vXFEKYNhZkaGnsFTTSa
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- $PELF (BgJW7U1u…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 0.0%, consisting of 0.0% from fees and 0.0% from rewards. Because 100% of yield is fee-sourced and reward dependency is not established, emission decay would mainly remove an already limited reward contribution unless trading activity increases.
The current total APR is 0.0%, consisting of 0.0% from fees and 0.0% from rewards. Because 100% of yield is fee-sourced and reward dependency is not established, emission decay would mainly remove an already limited reward contribution unless trading activity increases.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the main remaining source of LP return. With 24-hour volume represented by $1 against $70K of liquidity, fees may not provide a meaningful replacement if swap activity stays at its current level.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the main remaining source of LP return. With 24-hour volume represented by $1 against $70K of liquidity, fees may not provide a meaningful replacement if swap activity stays at its current level.
Risk is elevated because $PELF can move sharply, liquidity can contract quickly, and recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable. The pool also carries a CRITICAL scanner signal and an unopposed EXIT signal, while its current return is only 0.0%.
Risk is elevated because $PELF can move sharply, liquidity can contract quickly, and recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable. The pool also carries a CRITICAL scanner signal and an unopposed EXIT signal, while its current return is only 0.0%.
For this pool, an exit is warranted when the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, liquidity drains, or volume remains insufficient to support fees; the live verdict is REDUCE. A sharp $PELF move or a collapse in rewards is an additional reason to reassess rather than wait for historical IL data.
For this pool, an exit is warranted when the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, liquidity drains, or volume remains insufficient to support fees; the live verdict is REDUCE. A sharp $PELF move or a collapse in rewards is an additional reason to reassess rather than wait for historical IL data.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and recent volume is only $1 against $70K of liquidity. At 0.0% total APR, recovery would require sustained fee generation and limited further price divergence, neither of which is established by the current data.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and recent volume is only $1 against $70K of liquidity. At 0.0% total APR, recovery would require sustained fee generation and limited further price divergence, neither of which is established by the current data.
