new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 places SOL-FAT in an exit-oriented profile, not a position-building profile. The live verdict is EXIT: the AI engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools indicates a middling-to-weak position within the tracked set, while the low activity and memecoin exposure limit the score. The assessment could improve through sustained volume, deeper TVL, credible fee generation, and a resolved scanner warning; a TVL drain or yield collapse would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$50.69K
Total value locked
$156.37
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -13.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: withdraw if pool liquidity falls materially, trading activity does not improve, or the scanner's CRITICAL condition remains paired with an unopposed EXIT signal. If using a concentrated position, keep the range narrow only while price remains active within it and rebalance when it leaves the range; otherwise, avoid adding capital.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $156.37 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.39 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 SOL-FAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#696 of 36746 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2081 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FAT liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FAT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less value than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.1% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, for Total APR of 1.1%. 99% means the displayed return depends on swap fees rather than an active reward stream. Reward dependency is not established, so the APR should not be treated as protected from changes in trading activity or pool conditions.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and concentrated-range exposure cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FAT also carries high token-price and liquidity-regime risk. Any emissions can decay or cease, and exit timing matters because a falling token price, shrinking liquidity, or reduced trading activity can make the fee return insufficient relative to inventory losses.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than FAT. For this LP, SOL price movements change the relative inventory value against FAT; a sharp SOL move can increase rebalancing and impermanent-loss exposure even if the pool continues to receive swaps.
tollFAT Context
FAT is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and price discovery concentrated in a smaller market than SOL. A rapid FAT repricing or loss of external liquidity can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset while making exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FAT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less value than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3bJtn2up6q28UVbse2fVWqu6H2QfSEJuQHYU1xMhStQv
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FAT (5LJMJyR8…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed return is 1.1%, made up of 1.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not the main source of this pool's stated APR, but any future incentive program would be temporary unless replenished.
The displayed return is 1.1%, made up of 1.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not the main source of this pool's stated APR, but any future incentive program would be temporary unless replenished.
The pool would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 1.1%, rather than rewards. Since reward dependency is not established and current reward APR is 0.0%, an incentive expiry would not remove a currently stated reward stream but could reduce future reasons for liquidity providers to remain.
The pool would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 1.1%, rather than rewards. Since reward dependency is not established and current reward APR is 0.0%, an incentive expiry would not remove a currently stated reward stream but could reduce future reasons for liquidity providers to remain.
Risk is elevated because FAT can reprice sharply and may have less external liquidity than SOL. The pool also has $51K TVL, $156 in 24h volume, a 0.00x Vol/TVL ratio, and a scanner status of CRITICAL, so both market loss and difficult execution are relevant risks.
Risk is elevated because FAT can reprice sharply and may have less external liquidity than SOL. The pool also has $51K TVL, $156 in 24h volume, a 0.00x Vol/TVL ratio, and a scanner status of CRITICAL, so both market loss and difficult execution are relevant risks.
For SOL-FAT, an exit is reasonable if liquidity drains, trading activity weakens further, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or the unopposed EXIT signal persists. Do not wait for emissions to offset losses if the pool's fee generation or FAT liquidity is deteriorating.
For SOL-FAT, an exit is reasonable if liquidity drains, trading activity weakens further, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or the unopposed EXIT signal persists. Do not wait for emissions to offset losses if the pool's fee generation or FAT liquidity is deteriorating.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with the pool's low trading activity. At the current stated fee return of 1.1%, break-even depends on future volume, SOL-FAT price divergence, and the cost of exiting the position.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with the pool's low trading activity. At the current stated fee return of 1.1%, break-even depends on future volume, SOL-FAT price divergence, and the cost of exiting the position.
