new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 9/100 places SOL-FAT in a middling, not leading, position: Enter is 10/100, Hold is 8/100, and Exit is 93/100, with the live verdict set to EXIT. Its rank of #1245 of 24532 raydium-amm pools indicates it is above many listed pools but far from the strongest group. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, consistent with a pool whose fee-funded return is constrained by low activity rather than rewards. A sustained TVL drain, lower volume, weaker fee accrual, or a sharper FAT liquidity shock would change the assessment toward exit; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity would provide the clearest basis for reassessment.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$59.80K
Total value locked
$154.44
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow, actively monitored SOL/FAT range rather than a passive full-range position, and rebalance or exit when the price reaches either boundary or when trading activity no longer plausibly supports the fee income represented by 0.6%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $154.44 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.39 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 7 SOL-FAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13431 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19410 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FAT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the weaker-performing token, and FAT may be difficult to sell quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.6% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, while reward dependency and any remaining reward duration are not established. For this MEMECOIN pool, emission decay should be treated as a potential future reduction in incentives rather than a current source of return; the present case rests on swap fees.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent range behavior cannot be used to estimate realized inventory risk. SOL-FAT is a MEMECOIN pool: FAT can experience abrupt price moves, shallow exit liquidity, and rapid changes in the SOL/FAT ratio, while emissions can decay or stop without notice. LPs should plan exit timing around liquidity and trading activity rather than assuming incentives will persist.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than FAT. A sharp SOL move changes the SOL/FAT price ratio; if FAT does not move with SOL, the pool rebalances the LP toward one asset and can realize impermanent loss relative to simply holding both.
tollFAT Context
FAT is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine most of the pair's idiosyncratic liquidity and price risk. A rapid FAT rally or decline can move the SOL/FAT ratio outside an LP's intended range, while thin external liquidity can make exits more costly and increase inventory imbalance.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FAT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the weaker-performing token, and FAT may be difficult to sell quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3bJtn2up6q28UVbse2fVWqu6H2QfSEJuQHYU1xMhStQv
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FAT (5LJMJyR8…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so the stated APR is not currently supported by rewards. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, decay would lower the reward component while the fee component remains dependent on trading volume.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so the stated APR is not currently supported by rewards. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, decay would lower the reward component while the fee component remains dependent on trading volume.
Because the current reward-only component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the stated return. The remaining case would be 0.6% from trading fees, which depends on the pool's 0.00x activity level.
Because the current reward-only component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the stated return. The remaining case would be 0.6% from trading fees, which depends on the pool's 0.00x activity level.
Risk is high relative to a SOL/stablecoin pool because FAT can move sharply, lose external liquidity, or become difficult to exit. The pool's $60K TVL and $154 24h volume also leave fee income sensitive to changes in a small trading base.
Risk is high relative to a SOL/stablecoin pool because FAT can move sharply, lose external liquidity, or become difficult to exit. The pool's $60K TVL and $154 24h volume also leave fee income sensitive to changes in a small trading base.
For SOL-FAT, consider exiting when price reaches your range boundary, FAT liquidity deteriorates, or fee income no longer compensates for inventory risk and monitoring costs. A persistent decline from $154 in daily volume or from $60K in TVL would be a concrete warning signal.
For SOL-FAT, consider exiting when price reaches your range boundary, FAT liquidity deteriorates, or fee income no longer compensates for inventory risk and monitoring costs. A persistent decline from $154 in daily volume or from $60K in TVL would be a concrete warning signal.
There is no defensible break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. With total APR at 0.6% and fee APR at 0.6%, recovery depends on future trading fees and whether SOL and FAT later converge in relative price.
There is no defensible break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. With total APR at 0.6% and fee APR at 0.6%, recovery depends on future trading fees and whether SOL and FAT later converge in relative price.
