new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-WALTER in a middle range, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #83 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. That ranking indicates a relatively strong position within the tracked set, but it does not remove the pool’s low-activity and memecoin risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell further, fee income collapsed, or WALTER liquidity became difficult to exit; stronger sustained volume or clearer reward support could improve it.
Computed 2026-11-02 12:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.84K
Total value locked
$46.35
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored price range and set an exit trigger for a sustained drop in pool activity below 0.00x or a visible withdrawal of WALTER-side liquidity; do not leave the position unattended while relying on the fee APR.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $46.35 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.12 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 3 SOL-WALTER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14190 of 94821 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20321 of 152129
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-WALTER liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WALTER into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can differ from simply holding SOL and WALTER, especially if WALTER’s price moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted return decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield is fee-derived, so the current APR is not materially supported by farm emissions. Reward dependency and the remaining reward duration are not established in the available pool data, so the reward component should not be treated as durable.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity remaining in range are not available, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-WALTER carries WALTER repricing, liquidity withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk in addition to SOL exposure. Emission decay can remove any incentive component, making exit timing more important if volume weakens or WALTER liquidity deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single memecoin, which can make its side of the position easier to value and exit. A large SOL move against WALTER changes the pool’s inventory mix and can create losses relative to simply holding the two assets, even when fee income continues.
tollWALTER Context
WALTER is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and liquidity are likely to dominate the pool’s execution risk. A sharp WALTER repricing can push the position toward one asset, while thin external liquidity can increase slippage when an LP exits or rebalances.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WALTER into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can differ from simply holding SOL and WALTER, especially if WALTER’s price moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 412Mr1t8g1xSzW4wBaCV8J8KDFrhff46aNqGMSoK1asL
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- WALTER (FV56CmR7…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
6%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, and could leave the pool relying primarily on 0.1%. Because 100% of current yield comes from fees, weaker trading activity would also reduce the realized return.
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, and could leave the pool relying primarily on 0.1%. Because 100% of current yield comes from fees, weaker trading activity would also reduce the realized return.
If incentives expire, the reward component can fall to zero and the APR would move toward the fee-only rate of 0.1%. The current reward schedule is not established, so the timing of that change cannot be inferred from these pool metrics.
If incentives expire, the reward component can fall to zero and the APR would move toward the fee-only rate of 0.1%. The current reward schedule is not established, so the timing of that change cannot be inferred from these pool metrics.
The main risks are WALTER price collapse, thin exit liquidity, and losses relative to holding SOL and WALTER separately. This pool also has limited activity relative to its liquidity at 0.00x, while recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are not available for measurement.
The main risks are WALTER price collapse, thin exit liquidity, and losses relative to holding SOL and WALTER separately. This pool also has limited activity relative to its liquidity at 0.00x, while recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are not available for measurement.
Consider exiting when WALTER liquidity is visibly thinning, pool activity falls below 0.00x, or the position leaves its intended price range and rebalancing no longer justifies the cost. An exit signal should be based on liquidity and fee generation, not the headline 0.1% alone.
Consider exiting when WALTER liquidity is visibly thinning, pool activity falls below 0.00x, or the position leaves its intended price range and rebalancing no longer justifies the cost. An exit signal should be based on liquidity and fee generation, not the headline 0.1% alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The maximum reference point is the fee-only rate of 0.1%, but fees are variable and may not offset a rapid SOL-WALTER price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The maximum reference point is the fee-only rate of 0.1%, but fees are variable and may not offset a rapid SOL-WALTER price divergence.
