new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not among the highest-ranked opportunities. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls enough to reduce 0.0%, or fee generation becomes inconsistent; it would strengthen if liquidity and fee-producing volume persist without a material increase in price divergence.
Computed 2026-10-23 11:21 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$114.10K
Total value locked
$72.38
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -82.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Reassess or exit if rolling twenty-four-hour volume falls materially below $114K for several consecutive days, because fee-funded yield would then have less trading activity to support it.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $72.38 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.18 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-NFW pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14978 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 15% of all Solana pools
overall rank #21534 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NFW liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NFW into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up holding more of the asset that falls in price and may withdraw less value than you deposited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the yield currently depends on swap flow, so APR can fall quickly if volume or liquidity changes; no dependable rewards duration is established for this pool.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and the share of liquidity remaining in range are not reported, so recent IL performance and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-NFW carries elevated price-divergence and liquidity-withdrawal risk, while emission decay is not a reliable support for returns because reward contribution is currently absent. Exit timing should therefore be based on falling volume, shrinking liquidity, or a sustained deterioration in fee generation rather than on an assumed incentive schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than NFW. SOL price moves relative to NFW create the main source of divergence for this LP; a sharp move in SOL can increase impermanent loss even when the pool continues to generate fees.
tollNFW Context
NFW is the less liquid memecoin side of the pair, so its price can be more sensitive to concentrated buying, selling, and liquidity withdrawal. A large NFW move against SOL can rebalance the position toward the weakening asset, while thin external liquidity can make the LP harder to exit at an expected price.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NFW into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up holding more of the asset that falls in price and may withdraw less value than you deposited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 44WCpikTbEjtYV6BAFYmbQ2YM4R37rxyPp4ToFENFGZ8
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- NFW (rxczFZFv…)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.0% and 100% is fee-funded. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the total APR would decline unless trading fees increase enough to offset them.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.0% and 100% is fee-funded. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the total APR would decline unless trading fees increase enough to offset them.
There is currently no stated reward contribution, so the direct effect of incentive expiry is limited at present. The remaining return would depend on 0.0%, which can fall if the pool's trading volume declines.
There is currently no stated reward contribution, so the direct effect of incentive expiry is limited at present. The remaining return would depend on 0.0%, which can fall if the pool's trading volume declines.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with two established assets because NFW may experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and rapid liquidity withdrawal. The pool also lacks reported recent IL and range data, so those risks cannot be calibrated from the supplied history.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with two established assets because NFW may experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and rapid liquidity withdrawal. The pool also lacks reported recent IL and range data, so those risks cannot be calibrated from the supplied history.
For SOL-NFW, consider exiting when volume no longer supports 0.0%, liquidity begins draining from $114K, or NFW's price movement creates a sustained imbalance against SOL. Waiting for a reward event is not a suitable exit framework because the current reward component is 0.0%.
For SOL-NFW, consider exiting when volume no longer supports 0.0%, liquidity begins draining from $114K, or NFW's price movement creates a sustained imbalance against SOL. Waiting for a reward event is not a suitable exit framework because the current reward component is 0.0%.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent IL history and range exposure are not reported. Break-even depends on how quickly fees at 0.0% offset the divergence loss, and that rate can change materially with volume and liquidity.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent IL history and range exposure are not reported. Break-even depends on how quickly fees at 0.0% offset the divergence loss, and that rate can change materially with volume and liquidity.
