USDC-SWOPon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $27.23K
- APR
- 0.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $74.94 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 44WJ6Jnt…hmu6 · observed 2026-10-05
Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 44% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter at 40/100, Hold at 49/100, and Exit at 50/100; the live verdict is REDUCE. That assessment is consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #1720 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, placing it in a weak relative position despite its fee-only structure. A sustained increase in volume relative to TVL, deeper retained liquidity, and verifiable non-decaying rewards could improve the assessment; a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-05 11:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$27.23K
Total value locked
$74.94
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -2.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Do not leave a passive position open: use a narrow, actively monitored range and exit if the scanner remains CRITICAL or if the pool's low 0.00x activity does not improve, rather than waiting for fee APR to compensate for memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $74.94 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.75 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USDC-SWOP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#334 of 18237 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1810 of 130194
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDC-SWOP liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and SWOP into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a share of fees, but you can end up holding more of the falling token and less of the rising one.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.3% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of the return comes from trading fees, while no reward contribution is currently reflected. Reward dependency cannot be verified, and no reliable rewards-expiration schedule is available, so emission-driven APR should not be treated as a predictable source of income.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and the supplied data does not establish the share of liquidity that remained in range. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, SWOP price dispersion can create material inventory imbalance against USDC, while emission decay can reduce any future incentive support. Exit timing therefore depends on sustained swap activity, liquidity retention, and whether the pool continues to justify its capital relative to alternatives.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stablecoin side of the pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool's $27K. If SWOP falls, the position tends to accumulate SWOP while losing USDC exposure; if SWOP rises, the position tends to sell SWOP into strength and hold less of the appreciating token.
tollSWOP Context
SWOP is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price action is the principal source of inventory imbalance and impermanent-loss risk. Its liquidity outside this pool should be checked before entry because thin external markets can increase slippage and make an LP position harder to unwind efficiently.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and SWOP into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a share of fees, but you can end up holding more of the falling token and less of the rising one.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 44WJ6Jnt52yp7Yk7A52VZCpfMfMBPCSF3g2N5Tgthmu6
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Token B
- SWOP (GAehkgN1…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, so the displayed 0.3% is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion can fall while the fee portion remains dependent on trading activity.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, so the displayed 0.3% is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion can fall while the fee portion remains dependent on trading activity.
Because 0.0% is currently the reward component, expiration would not remove a current reward stream but could prevent future incentive support. The remaining return would depend on 0.3% and the pool's 0.00x trading activity.
Because 0.0% is currently the reward component, expiration would not remove a current reward stream but could prevent future incentive support. The remaining return would depend on 0.3% and the pool's 0.00x trading activity.
The main risks are SWOP price volatility, inventory imbalance against USDC, and limited exit liquidity at $27K TVL. The pool's 0.3% return is fee-funded, but 100% does not offset a large adverse move in SWOP.
The main risks are SWOP price volatility, inventory imbalance against USDC, and limited exit liquidity at $27K TVL. The pool's 0.3% return is fee-funded, but 100% does not offset a large adverse move in SWOP.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume stays weak relative to TVL, or liquidity begins to drain. The current live verdict is REDUCE, so waiting for emission changes is not a substitute for monitoring exit conditions.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume stays weak relative to TVL, or liquidity begins to drain. The current live verdict is REDUCE, so waiting for emission changes is not a substitute for monitoring exit conditions.
A reliable break-even period cannot be established because the seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and activity is limited. With 0.3% total APR and 0.3% from fees, recovery would require sustained fees that exceed the position's inventory loss and withdrawal costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be established because the seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and activity is limited. With 0.3% total APR and 0.3% from fees, recovery would require sustained fees that exceed the position's inventory loss and withdrawal costs.
