new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 16/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 17/100, and Exit at 88/100. That combination indicates that the model does not support a new allocation and assigns the strongest weight to reducing exposure. The live verdict is EXIT; ai_engine reports hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and identifies an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being assessed in isolation, but its score still reflects weak pool-specific conditions. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume and fee generation, deeper or more persistent liquidity, and a less severe scanner signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-08-27 04:33 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$26.11K
Total value locked
$83.69
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -52.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed exit signal as the rebalance trigger: exit rather than widen the position if 0.00x remains depressed or volume does not improve from $84 relative to $26K. No tick-range history is available, so avoid assuming that a concentrated range is currently supported by observed trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $83.69 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.21 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 6 SOL-STUPID pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-STUPID liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and STUPID into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of the two tokens you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially if STUPID's price or liquidity falls.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return decomposes into 0.6% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component supporting the stated return. The reward schedule and remaining duration are not established in the supplied data, making emission-decay analysis unavailable; any future incentives would need to be assessed separately from the fee yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available, so realized divergence loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-STUPID also carries token-specific demand and liquidity risk: emission decay can remove any temporary support, while exit timing matters if STUPID liquidity or trading activity contracts. The low turnover relative to TVL makes fee income sensitive to even modest volume declines.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid side of this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana. For this LP, a SOL price move relative to STUPID changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid. SOL's broader market liquidity may make the SOL leg easier to value or hedge, but it does not remove pair-level risk.
tollSTUPID Context
STUPID is the memecoin leg and is the primary source of idiosyncratic liquidity, demand, and price risk in this pair. A sharp STUPID move against SOL can alter the LP's inventory through arbitrage, while falling interest can reduce both exit liquidity and fee volume. Compared with SOL, STUPID's value depends more heavily on continued market attention and pool-specific liquidity.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and STUPID into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of the two tokens you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially if STUPID's price or liquidity falls.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 45FffdEVGaik9mraDpFkhnLbfghTSVwQJx3mnLXHV5hk
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- STUPID (w6iohhdC…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
7%
APR
0%
APR
208%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 0.6% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. Because the reward schedule is not established here, future emission decay cannot be quantified, but any reduction in rewards would affect only the reward component.
The current return is split between 0.6% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. Because the reward schedule is not established here, future emission decay cannot be quantified, but any reduction in rewards would affect only the reward component.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall away and the LP would rely on 0.6% in trading fees. Since 100% of the current yield already comes from fees, the main question is whether the pool's 0.00x turnover is sufficient to sustain that fee income.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall away and the LP would rely on 0.6% in trading fees. Since 100% of the current yield already comes from fees, the main question is whether the pool's 0.00x turnover is sufficient to sustain that fee income.
Risk is high because SOL is paired with a token whose demand and liquidity can change rapidly. SOL-STUPID has $26K in liquidity and $84 in 24h volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so exit liquidity and divergence risk cannot be reliably modeled from those histories.
Risk is high because SOL is paired with a token whose demand and liquidity can change rapidly. SOL-STUPID has $26K in liquidity and $84 in 24h volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so exit liquidity and divergence risk cannot be reliably modeled from those histories.
For this pool, the scanner's CRITICAL and unopposed EXIT signal is already a concrete warning. An LP should also exit if volume remains at $84 against $26K of TVL, if liquidity begins draining, or if fee income no longer compensates for the exposure to STUPID.
For this pool, the scanner's CRITICAL and unopposed EXIT signal is already a concrete warning. An LP should also exit if volume remains at $84 against $26K of TVL, if liquidity begins draining, or if fee income no longer compensates for the exposure to STUPID.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and volume is only $84 against $26K of TVL. The fee-only component is 0.6%, so recovery depends on actual future fees, token-price divergence, and whether liquidity remains available for exit.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and volume is only $84 against $26K of TVL. The fee-only component is 0.6%, so recovery depends on actual future fees, token-price divergence, and whether liquidity remains available for exit.
