WealthVille
SOL
S
San
S

SOL-Sanon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $28.75K
APR
0.2% APR
24h Volume
$36.36 24h vol
Pool address
4BBvrWsoMMq7 · observed 2026-08-22
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-SAN below its Enter threshold of 15/100, below its Hold threshold of 20/100, and far from its Exit threshold of 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. Ranked #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, it is not among the weakest pools by rank alone, but the scanner's CRITICAL status and strong unopposed EXIT signal outweigh the ai_engine=hold reading. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume, deeper usable liquidity, and clearance of the critical signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.

Computed 2026-08-06 21:40 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$28.75K

Total value locked

$36.36

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.2%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-0.9%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 2471m ago
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleStrong stable income score: 87/100
check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 66/100
tips_and_updates

If entering, use a deliberately narrow range only when you can monitor it, and set an automatic exit or rebalance trigger for any sustained scanner status of CRITICAL, a material TVL drain, or a loss of fee-generating volume.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.2%
Fee APR0.2%
Volume$36.36
Fees Earned$0.09

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.0%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.9%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-0.9%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 3.7x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 SOL-San pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#363 of 53795 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #469 of 95923

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-San liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SAN into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the asset that performs worse, and thin trading activity means the fee income may not last.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

SOL-SAN decomposes into 0.2% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100%. The current return therefore depends entirely on trading fees, not farm emissions; it should be reassessed if volume falls, liquidity expands without matching flow, or incentives are introduced and later decay.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so there is no measured basis here for estimating recent price divergence or range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SAN carries token-specific volatility, shallow-liquidity, and exit-timing risk; attention and trading flow can decay quickly, while any future emissions may decline before an LP can exit efficiently.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than SAN. SOL price movement changes the pool's asset balance and can create impermanent loss when SOL diverges from SAN, while its external liquidity generally makes SOL the easier leg to hedge or sell.

tollSan Context

SAN is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine much of the pool's idiosyncratic liquidity and exit risk. A sharp SAN move can create impermanent loss and rebalance the position toward the weaker asset; limited external liquidity can also make realized exits differ from quoted prices.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SAN into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the asset that performs worse, and thin trading activity means the fee income may not last.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

San
SanSan ChanSolana
Explorer

San Chan (San) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
4BBvrWsocM9wY2qXCCufCL8GxKtNeXT73uNfveK4MMq7
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
San (2z1p8xCE…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward contribution is 0.0%, so the reported 0.2% is currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving only the fee stream represented by 0.2%.

The current reward contribution is 0.0%, so the reported 0.2% is currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving only the fee stream represented by 0.2%.

There is currently no reward contribution in the reported APR, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 0.2%, which is supported by 100% and therefore requires continuing trading volume.

There is currently no reward contribution in the reported APR, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 0.2%, which is supported by 100% and therefore requires continuing trading volume.

Risk is high because SAN may be volatile or illiquid while SOL has deeper alternative markets, creating price divergence and difficult exits. SOL-SAN also has $29K of liquidity and $36 of recent volume, so fees may not compensate for token and exit risk.

Risk is high because SAN may be volatile or illiquid while SOL has deeper alternative markets, creating price divergence and difficult exits. SOL-SAN also has $29K of liquidity and $36 of recent volume, so fees may not compensate for token and exit risk.

For SOL-SAN, an exit is indicated if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed EXIT signal persists, TVL drains, or fee-generating volume weakens. Waiting for a nominal APR can be unsuitable when the position is becoming harder to unwind.

For SOL-SAN, an exit is indicated if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed EXIT signal persists, TVL drains, or fee-generating volume weakens. Waiting for a nominal APR can be unsuitable when the position is becoming harder to unwind.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income depends on $36 relative to $29K. Any estimate based only on 0.2% would assume that current trading activity persists.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income depends on $36 relative to $29K. Any estimate based only on 0.2% would assume that current trading activity persists.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights