USDC-GRNDon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $29.53K
- APR
- 205.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $31.41K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- 4biQrAVe…6Uxb · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 44/100 with Enter 40/100 / Hold 50/100 / Exit 30/100 and live verdict HOLD places this pool near the bottom of its raydium-clmm set at rank #9776 of 9963. The assessment reflects ai_engine=exit, scanner=CRITICAL, and a round-trip liquidity pattern: TVL declined over seven days but rebounded over fourteen, so the bleed cap was skipped rather than treating the rebound as durable growth. The score would improve only with sustained TVL growth, stable or rising fee volume, and less dependence on short-lived liquidity; a renewed TVL drain or collapse in fee APR would reinforce the exit assessment.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$29.53K
Total value locked
$31.41K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up205.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 211.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range centered on the current USDC-GRND price and set an automated exit trigger for another sustained seven-day TVL decline or a material drop in fee APR; do not wait for a reward increase to justify staying, since the current reward contribution is zero.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 205.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 111.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $31.41K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $98.79 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 USDC-GRND pools
by AI Farmer Score
#362 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2467 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDC-GRND liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and GRND into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up holding more of the token that fell in price, and the pool's shallow liquidity makes leaving during a selloff more difficult.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into fee-only APR of 111.9% and reward-only APR of 93.7%. 54% means the current rate depends entirely on trading activity, not farm emissions. Reward duration and dependency are not established, so the APR should be treated as volume-sensitive rather than emission-supported.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range exposure are not available for this pool, so realized LP drag and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, GRND price moves can rapidly shift the position toward one asset, while low liquidity can increase execution impact during rebalancing or exit. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because rewards contribute no reported APR; exit timing still matters if volume or liquidity weakens.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable-value side of the pair and normally has deep liquidity across Solana, but this pool's own depth is shallow at $30K. USDC price stability limits one source of divergence risk; a depeg or sharp GRND move would still alter the LP inventory and its dollar value.
tollGRND Context
GRND is the volatile memecoin side, so its price action is the primary driver of inventory shifts and potential impermanent loss for this LP. Liquidity for GRND outside this pool should be assessed separately rather than inferred from USDC liquidity, because thinner external markets can make exits and rebalancing more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and GRND into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up holding more of the token that fell in price, and the pool's shallow liquidity makes leaving during a selloff more difficult.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4biQrAVeb65DeoANENdcqvRDMp8QZ8qhHoazLj4t6Uxb
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Token B
- GRND (GRNDYDpq…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed reward component because reward-only APR is 93.7%. The current total APR of 205.5% comes from fee-only APR of 111.9%, so trading volume rather than emissions determines present yield.
Emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed reward component because reward-only APR is 93.7%. The current total APR of 205.5% comes from fee-only APR of 111.9%, so trading volume rather than emissions determines present yield.
The current breakdown already reports reward-only APR of 93.7%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a reported reward contribution. Fee income would remain tied to trading activity and could fall if volume declines, making the total APR lower than 205.5%.
The current breakdown already reports reward-only APR of 93.7%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a reported reward contribution. Fee income would remain tied to trading activity and could fall if volume declines, making the total APR lower than 205.5%.
Risk is elevated because GRND can move sharply against USDC, shifting your inventory and creating impermanent loss, while TVL is only $30K against 24h volume of $31K. Tick-range history is unavailable, so the portion of time earning fees inside the active range cannot be verified.
Risk is elevated because GRND can move sharply against USDC, shifting your inventory and creating impermanent loss, while TVL is only $30K against 24h volume of $31K. Tick-range history is unavailable, so the portion of time earning fees inside the active range cannot be verified.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if the recent round-trip TVL behavior turns into a sustained decline, fee APR falls below your required hurdle, or GRND volatility makes the selected range difficult to maintain. The live verdict is HOLD, so waiting for emissions is not a supported exit rationale.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if the recent round-trip TVL behavior turns into a sustained decline, fee APR falls below your required hurdle, or GRND volatility makes the selected range difficult to maintain. The live verdict is HOLD, so waiting for emissions is not a supported exit rationale.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because seven-day impermanent loss and tick-in-range history are not available, and future price paths are unknown. Fee income at 111.9% is annualized and can offset losses only if volume persists; it is not a guarantee of recovery.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because seven-day impermanent loss and tick-in-range history are not available, and future price paths are unknown. Fee income at 111.9% is annualized and can offset losses only if volume persists; it is not a guarantee of recovery.
