SOL-PENGUon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $35.00K
- APR
- 2.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $55.70 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 2.00% fee
- Pool address
- 4r2AGQRj…2qeR · observed 2026-10-26
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 places SOL-PENGU below the Enter threshold of 10/100, the Hold threshold of 30/100, and the Exit threshold of 60/100, producing a live verdict of AVOID. Its #1795-of-9963 ranking among raydium-clmm pools is consistent with the stated drivers: ai_engine=hold, a risk score of 80/100, and weak yield. A further TVL drain, lower fee APR, or weaker volume would worsen the assessment; sustained growth in 0.00x, deeper liquidity, and durable fee generation could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.00K
Total value locked
$55.70
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored, relatively narrow tick range only if you can rebalance promptly when the position leaves range; otherwise, exit when fee income no longer justifies the PENGU exposure or when 0.00x and pool liquidity deteriorate materially.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $55.70 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.11 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#6 of 26 SOL-PENGU pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1343 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18446 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-PENGU liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PENGU into the pool so other users can trade between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the asset that performed worse, and the pool's small size can make exits harder.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 2.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the reported yield is fee-derived, so the return depends on actual swap activity rather than emissions. Reward duration and dependency are not established, so the reward component should not be treated as durable income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from those measures. As a MEMECOIN pool, PENGU can experience sharp price moves, shallow liquidity, and rapid changes in fee generation; any future emissions would also be subject to decay, making exit timing important before incentives weaken. The reported risk score of 80/100 reflects this combination of high asset and liquidity risk with weak yield.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against PENGU and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool's $35K. SOL price moves change the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss when SOL and PENGU move differently, while large SOL moves can also push a concentrated position outside its active range.
tollPENGU Context
PENGU supplies the memecoin exposure and is likely to have less consistent liquidity than SOL across venues. A sharp PENGU move relative to SOL can make the position accumulate the weaker-performing asset, while reduced PENGU trading activity lowers the fees available to offset that exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PENGU into the pool so other users can trade between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the asset that performed worse, and the pool's small size can make exits harder.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4r2AGQRjuLpGL9o1vuW1mkcVHvE4DTi7YZJhqGHj2qeR
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- PENGU (2zMMhcVQ…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 2.2% to the total APR of 2.2%. If emissions are introduced or reduced, that reward portion can decline, leaving trading fees as the primary remaining source of return.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 2.2% to the total APR of 2.2%. If emissions are introduced or reduced, that reward portion can decline, leaving trading fees as the primary remaining source of return.
The reward portion would fall away, while the fee component of 2.2% would remain dependent on swap activity. Because 99% of current yield is fee-derived, incentive expiry would mainly remove the non-fee contribution rather than the pool's trading-fee income.
The reward portion would fall away, while the fee component of 2.2% would remain dependent on swap activity. Because 99% of current yield is fee-derived, incentive expiry would mainly remove the non-fee contribution rather than the pool's trading-fee income.
Risk is elevated because PENGU can move sharply against SOL, liquidity is only $35K, and recent turnover is 0.00x. The reported risk score is 80/100, and fee income at 2.2% may not compensate for price divergence or difficult exits.
Risk is elevated because PENGU can move sharply against SOL, liquidity is only $35K, and recent turnover is 0.00x. The reported risk score is 80/100, and fee income at 2.2% may not compensate for price divergence or difficult exits.
For SOL-PENGU, consider exiting when PENGU liquidity or pool TVL declines, when fee generation no longer offsets the exposure, or when the position moves outside its intended tick range and cannot be rebalanced promptly. A sustained deterioration in 0.00x is an additional exit signal.
For SOL-PENGU, consider exiting when PENGU liquidity or pool TVL declines, when fee generation no longer offsets the exposure, or when the position moves outside its intended tick range and cannot be rebalanced promptly. A sustained deterioration in 0.00x is an additional exit signal.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable. At 2.2%, with 2.2% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, recovery depends on future volume and price paths rather than a fixed timetable.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable. At 2.2%, with 2.2% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, recovery depends on future volume and price paths rather than a fixed timetable.
