MCDx-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $215.61K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $371.40K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 5MGvNj9R…2DsF · observed 2026-10-09
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 47/100, with Enter at 43/100, Hold at 53/100, and Exit at 28/100; the live verdict is HOLD. Its #127 rank among 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it well above most listed pools, but the automated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold rather than an explicit reward advantage. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume contracted enough to reduce 500.0%, MCDX liquidity deteriorated, or the position spent more time outside its active range; it would strengthen if fee generation persisted while liquidity and range utilization improved.
Computed 2026-10-09 22:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$215.61K
Total value locked
$371.40K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 126.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor actively, and rebalance when the position approaches either boundary rather than waiting for it to become inactive. Treat a sustained drop in fee generation or a clear deterioration in MCDX liquidity as an exit signal, since there is no reward stream shown to offset weaker trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $371.40K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.71K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 MCDx-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#631 of 18657 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4572 of 135723
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MCDx-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MCDX and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You earn fees when trades use your range, but a large MCDX price move can change what tokens you hold and reduce the value of the position compared with simply holding the tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return depends on continued swap activity rather than a stated emissions schedule. Reward dependency and incentive duration are not established by the available pool data.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, MCDX-USDC carries substantial token-price, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emission decay is less relevant to the current fee-funded return, but any future incentives could decline quickly. Concentrated liquidity can also stop earning fees when price moves outside the selected range.
tollMCDx Context
MCDX is the volatile memecoin side of this pair, while USDC provides the dollar-denominated reference asset. The supplied metrics do not establish MCDX's liquidity depth elsewhere, so a sharp MCDX move or thinner external liquidity could increase slippage and impermanent loss for this LP. MCDX appreciation or depreciation relative to USDC changes the inventory mix and can push a concentrated position out of range.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable reference side of the pair and reduces exposure to a second volatile asset, but it does not remove MCDX-specific price risk. The supplied metrics do not quantify USDC liquidity elsewhere for this comparison. When MCDX moves against USDC, the LP's position is rebalanced toward the weaker-performing asset and may incur impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MCDX and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You earn fees when trades use your range, but a large MCDX price move can change what tokens you hold and reduce the value of the position compared with simply holding the tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5MGvNj9RNKNmzwp1LtZuQkZonEYtKJ3JuiyNQEUU2DsF
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- MCDx (XsqE9cRR…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 500.0%, made up of 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the displayed reward component is 0.0%, current yield is primarily tied to trading activity; any future emissions would be an additional, potentially declining component.
The current APR is 500.0%, made up of 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the displayed reward component is 0.0%, current yield is primarily tied to trading activity; any future emissions would be an additional, potentially declining component.
If incentives expire, the total APR should move toward the fee-only APR of 500.0%, assuming trading volume and liquidity remain similar. Since the current reward component is 0.0%, the immediate effect depends on whether the displayed reward stream changes further.
If incentives expire, the total APR should move toward the fee-only APR of 500.0%, assuming trading volume and liquidity remain similar. Since the current reward component is 0.0%, the immediate effect depends on whether the displayed reward stream changes further.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because MCDX can experience sharp price moves, thinner liquidity, and difficult exits. The pool has $216K of liquidity and $371K in daily volume, but unavailable impermanent-loss and range-history data prevent a precise loss estimate.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because MCDX can experience sharp price moves, thinner liquidity, and difficult exits. The pool has $216K of liquidity and $371K in daily volume, but unavailable impermanent-loss and range-history data prevent a precise loss estimate.
For this pool, consider exiting when MCDX liquidity deteriorates, fee generation falls materially, or price approaches the edge of your range without a plan to rebalance. A sustained reduction in 500.0% is more relevant than reward changes because 100% of yield comes from fees.
For this pool, consider exiting when MCDX liquidity deteriorates, fee generation falls materially, or price approaches the edge of your range without a plan to rebalance. A sustained reduction in 500.0% is more relevant than reward changes because 100% of yield comes from fees.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable. Break-even requires cumulative fees, currently represented by 500.0%, to exceed the position's realized impermanent loss and any trading or rebalancing costs.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable. Break-even requires cumulative fees, currently represented by 500.0%, to exceed the position's realized impermanent loss and any trading or rebalancing costs.
