CARDS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $66.11K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $65.98K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 5UUdSTWM…imJP · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 53/100 with Enter 51/100 / Hold 56/100 / Exit 26/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented assessment: the scanner is CRITICAL, the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, and the ai_engine is only HOLD. Its rank of #567 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools is middling rather than evidence of a leading venue, especially alongside $66K, $66K, and 1.00x. The assessment could improve through sustained volume, deeper liquidity, a nonzero and durable reward program, and resolution of the critical scanner finding; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or worsening price and range behavior would reinforce the exit view.
Computed 2026-08-23 05:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$66.11K
Total value locked
$65.98K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 153.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a deliberately narrow range only with a predefined rebalance trigger tied to CARDS moving outside that range, and exit if fee activity remains negligible or the scanner's critical signal persists rather than waiting for rewards to improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 380.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $65.98K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $659.76 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 15 CARDS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#88 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #610 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. In return, you receive a share of trading fees, but CARDS price changes can leave you with a different mix of CARDS and USDC and a value below simply holding the tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield consists of 380.5% fee APR and 119.5% reward APR. 76% of the yield is therefore attributed to trading fees, while the current data does not establish a separate reward runway or a time-bound incentive schedule. With 24-hour volume at $66K, the fee component depends on trading activity that is currently limited.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, CARDS price shocks can rapidly change the inventory mix and leave a concentrated position outside its selected range. Emission decay and incentive changes should be treated as exit-timing risks, although the current reward contribution is absent.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the volatile memecoin side of this pair, while USDC provides the dollar-denominated quote asset. The supplied data do not establish CARDS liquidity depth elsewhere; sharp CARDS price moves can shift the LP's holdings toward CARDS after a decline or toward USDC after a rally, with the resulting inventory change affecting realized returns.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the relatively stable settlement asset in the pair and is the reference value for measuring the position's dollar exposure. Its stability does not remove CARDS-specific risk: if CARDS moves sharply, the LP can hold a materially different CARDS-USDC mix than it deposited, and available USDC-side liquidity elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. In return, you receive a share of trading fees, but CARDS price changes can leave you with a different mix of CARDS and USDC and a value below simply holding the tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5UUdSTWM1gv4emMEfARYYS7DTb3RPm9P5WUoYrcBimJP
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 119.5%, so displayed yield is not presently dependent on emissions. If a future incentive program is introduced, emission decay could reduce that component while 380.5% would still depend on trading fees.
The current reward-only APR is 119.5%, so displayed yield is not presently dependent on emissions. If a future incentive program is introduced, emission decay could reduce that component while 380.5% would still depend on trading fees.
Because the current reward-only APR is 119.5%, expiration would not remove a currently displayed reward contribution. The remaining return would come from 380.5%, which is dependent on the pool's $66K trading volume and could be insufficient if activity stays low.
Because the current reward-only APR is 119.5%, expiration would not remove a currently displayed reward contribution. The remaining return would come from 380.5%, which is dependent on the pool's $66K trading volume and could be insufficient if activity stays low.
Risk is high because CARDS can move sharply, changing the position's token mix and potentially placing liquidity outside its chosen range. The pool has $66K, $66K volume, and an exit verdict of HOLD, so limited activity and memecoin price risk both matter.
Risk is high because CARDS can move sharply, changing the position's token mix and potentially placing liquidity outside its chosen range. The pool has $66K, $66K volume, and an exit verdict of HOLD, so limited activity and memecoin price risk both matter.
For this pool, an exit is defensible when the critical scanner finding persists, trading activity remains weak, liquidity drains, or CARDS leaves the selected range without a justified rebalance. The current verdict is HOLD, with a score of 53/100 and an exit threshold of 26/100.
For this pool, an exit is defensible when the critical scanner finding persists, trading activity remains weak, liquidity drains, or CARDS leaves the selected range without a justified rebalance. The current verdict is HOLD, with a score of 53/100 and an exit threshold of 26/100.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At a constant fee rate, the gross offset would depend on 380.5%, while CARDS price divergence, range exits, and changing 1.00x could make the actual break-even period longer or prevent it.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At a constant fee rate, the gross offset would depend on 380.5%, while CARDS price divergence, range exits, and changing 1.00x could make the actual break-even period longer or prevent it.
