SOL-POKTon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $47.22K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $87.09K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 5qJCeYWz…eise · observed 2026-10-28
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 58/100, with Enter 54/100, Hold 64/100, and Exit 18/100; the live verdict is HOLD. That combination describes a pool that is currently rated for holding existing exposure rather than receiving an unqualified new-entry signal, despite the pool's #52-of-4356 rank among orca-whirlpool pools. The verdict drivers show ai_engine=enter, with promotion to ENTER pending the required dwell period, so the current HOLD reflects a transition state rather than a settled entry classification. A sustained TVL drain, weaker volume, or collapse in fee APR would worsen the assessment; durable fee generation and stable liquidity could support promotion to ENTER.
Computed 2026-10-28 10:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$47.22K
Total value locked
$87.09K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 80.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a deliberately narrow initial tick range, set an alert for any move outside that range, and rebalance or exit rather than widening it automatically; reassess immediately if fee generation no longer supports the position's risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 232.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $87.09K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $260.63 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-POKT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#126 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1420 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-POKT liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and POKT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and may reduce the value of your deposit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 232.6% fee APR and 267.4% reward APR. 47% of the yield is attributed to trading fees, so the return depends on continued volume and fee generation rather than a current reward stream. Reward dependency is not established; any future emissions would be subject to the pool's schedule and could decay.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable, so the historical cost of holding this range cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. Recent tick-in-range data is also unavailable, leaving range utilization and rebalancing frequency unresolved. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-POKT carries elevated risks from abrupt price divergence, thin liquidity, migrating attention, and emission decay; exit timing matters because fee income can weaken before a position can be unwound efficiently.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's major-liquidity asset and has deeper markets across Solana, which generally provides more external routes than POKT. A sharp SOL move against POKT changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when fee income remains positive. SOL's broader liquidity may help execution, but it does not remove the pool's range and correlation risks.
tollPOKT Context
POKT is the thinner and more idiosyncratic side of this pair, with liquidity and price discovery more dependent on its own market activity. A POKT move against SOL can rapidly shift the LP position toward one asset and increase divergence loss. A decline in POKT volume or market depth can also reduce fee generation and make exits more price-sensitive.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and POKT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and may reduce the value of your deposit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5qJCeYWzvkrKuD1r7bQDus8ffm2vjrunxNUht6NTeise
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- POKT (6CAsXfiC…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
42%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 232.6% in fees and 267.4% in rewards, with the stated yield sourced from fees. If emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component while leaving fee APR dependent on trading volume.
The current return is split between 232.6% in fees and 267.4% in rewards, with the stated yield sourced from fees. If emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component while leaving fee APR dependent on trading volume.
There is currently no reward component reflected in 267.4%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. Future fee income would still depend on volume, and the total APR would move with 232.6% rather than with a subsidy.
There is currently no reward component reflected in 267.4%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. Future fee income would still depend on volume, and the total APR would move with 232.6% rather than with a subsidy.
SOL-POKT combines SOL exposure with POKT-specific price, liquidity, and attention risk. With TVL at $47K and volume at $87K, the pool's 1.84x volume-to-TVL ratio indicates that fee income depends on a relatively concentrated trading base, while memecoin price divergence can create impermanent loss.
SOL-POKT combines SOL exposure with POKT-specific price, liquidity, and attention risk. With TVL at $47K and volume at $87K, the pool's 1.84x volume-to-TVL ratio indicates that fee income depends on a relatively concentrated trading base, while memecoin price divergence can create impermanent loss.
For SOL-POKT, consider exiting when the chosen range is no longer active, fee generation deteriorates, or TVL and trading activity begin draining together. The current 18/100 Exit score is a useful warning input, but it should be combined with observed price movement and liquidity conditions rather than treated as a standalone trigger.
For SOL-POKT, consider exiting when the chosen range is no longer active, fee generation deteriorates, or TVL and trading activity begin draining together. The current 18/100 Exit score is a useful warning input, but it should be combined with observed price movement and liquidity conditions rather than treated as a standalone trigger.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. 232.6% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset divergence loss over any fixed holding period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. 232.6% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset divergence loss over any fixed holding period.
