new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 11/100, with Enter at 12/100, Hold at 10/100, and Exit at 91/100. That combination means the system assigns little support to opening or maintaining the position and a much stronger signal to leaving it; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=exit and a strong unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #8233 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it near the bottom of the tracked set. The assessment would improve with sustained volume growth, deeper TVL, and fee generation that persists without incentives; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-07 15:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$48.66K
Total value locked
$96.80
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
For this Raydium AMM, use no concentrated tick range; set a hard exit trigger before entry and withdraw if volume no longer supports 0.00x turnover or if the fee-only return falls materially below 0.8%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $96.80 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.24 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-$LOTTO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5306 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 10% of all Solana pools
overall rank #10032 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$LOTTO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $LOTTO into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of whichever token has fallen, and low trading activity can make the fee income unreliable.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of the stated yield is fee-funded, so the APR depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward component is currently reflected in the APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not available for this pool, so recent price-path damage and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-$LOTTO carries liquidity-thinning and price-gap risk when attention moves elsewhere. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the reward component is zero; exit timing matters if trading activity or the token's market depth deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against $LOTTO and has substantially broader trading liquidity across Solana than this individual pool. SOL price movement changes the pool's inventory mix: strong SOL appreciation generally leaves the LP with more $LOTTO exposure, while SOL weakness can have the opposite effect. That divergence from the deposited mix is the source of part of the LP's impermanent-loss risk.
toll$LOTTO Context
$LOTTO is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A rapid $LOTTO repricing can shift the LP toward the falling asset and make withdrawal execution more sensitive to available liquidity. A decline in $LOTTO trading interest would also reduce the fee stream supporting the position.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $LOTTO into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of whichever token has fallen, and low trading activity can make the fee income unreliable.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5zf4J2N2RGtUai7unfWEp45RqzeDW2QncRvtXqaaXUSc
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- $LOTTO (bwCs4bAM…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
412%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so scheduled emission decay is not presently reducing the stated APR. The pool's 0.8% total APR is instead supported by 0.8% in trading fees, although future emissions would need separate monitoring.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so scheduled emission decay is not presently reducing the stated APR. The pool's 0.8% total APR is instead supported by 0.8% in trading fees, although future emissions would need separate monitoring.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated APR, so expiration of farm incentives would not remove an existing reward stream. If incentives are introduced later, their expiry would leave the pool dependent on 0.8% and actual trading volume rather than the temporary reward APR.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated APR, so expiration of farm incentives would not remove an existing reward stream. If incentives are introduced later, their expiry would leave the pool dependent on 0.8% and actual trading volume rather than the temporary reward APR.
Risk is high relative to a deeper SOL pair because $LOTTO can reprice sharply and liquidity can thin quickly. This pool has $49K in liquidity, $97 in 24-hour volume, and a turnover ratio of 0.00x, while recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a deeper SOL pair because $LOTTO can reprice sharply and liquidity can thin quickly. This pool has $49K in liquidity, $97 in 24-hour volume, and a turnover ratio of 0.00x, while recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable.
Use a predefined exit rule rather than waiting for a subjective recovery: exit if volume weakens materially from the level represented by 0.00x, if TVL drains, or if the fee-only return falls below 0.8%. The current live verdict is EXIT, so the existing signal already favors exit over holding.
Use a predefined exit rule rather than waiting for a subjective recovery: exit if volume weakens materially from the level represented by 0.00x, if TVL drains, or if the fee-only return falls below 0.8%. The current live verdict is EXIT, so the existing signal already favors exit over holding.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. At a constant rate, gross fee break-even would be approximated by comparing the loss to 0.8%, but price divergence, changing volume, and withdrawals make that estimate non-guaranteed.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. At a constant rate, gross fee break-even would be approximated by comparing the loss to 0.8%, but price divergence, changing volume, and withdrawals make that estimate non-guaranteed.
