Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 assigns Enter 10/100, Hold 30/100, and Exit 60/100, with the live verdict at AVOID. The ai_engine=exit and scanner=CRITICAL drivers form a strong EXIT signal from multiple sources, consistent with the pool's #2354-of-2403 rank among raydium-amm pools. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume growth, deeper usable liquidity, and evidence that fee income or credible rewards can persist; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the current verdict.
Computed 2026-07-24 00:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$157.95K
Total value locked
$2.03K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 7.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
For an LP entering this pool, use the live verdict as an exit trigger: close the position on consecutive refreshes that retain an EXIT verdict, or sooner if TVL drains or fee-generating volume deteriorates rather than supporting the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.03K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.08 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-AOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1018 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2859 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AOL liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.6%, but price changes between the two tokens can leave your deposit worth less than simply holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of 0.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of the stated yield is fee-derived, so the pool is not currently dependent on emissions for its displayed return. Reward dependency and any remaining reward schedule are not established in the supplied metrics; emission changes therefore cannot be treated as a reliable source of additional APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range exposure are not available in the supplied data, so realized divergence loss and time spent in range cannot be assessed. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AOL carries concentrated token-specific volatility and liquidity risk; emission decay can remove any future incentive support, making exit timing important if AOL activity or liquidity weakens.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than in this pool. SOL price movement relative to AOL changes the pool composition and can create divergence loss for the LP, even when SOL itself remains liquid on other venues.
tollAOL Context
AOL is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity, price discovery, and holder concentration are likely to be more specific to this pool and related venues. A sharp AOL move against SOL can change the LP's inventory toward the weaker-performing asset and make withdrawal execution more sensitive to available depth.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.6%, but price changes between the two tokens can leave your deposit worth less than simply holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 69ZvRfF9K7c9DsRTouisoeKc7G5Lm1Gz4moKgRjGhsJV
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AOL (2oQNkePa…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce any reward component, but the current reward-only APR is 0.0%. The displayed return is therefore mainly tied to 0.6% in trading fees, and low activity limits how durable that fee income may be.
Emission decay would reduce any reward component, but the current reward-only APR is 0.0%. The displayed return is therefore mainly tied to 0.6% in trading fees, and low activity limits how durable that fee income may be.
Because reward-only APR is 0.0% and 100% of yield is fee-derived, incentive expiry would have little direct effect on the current displayed APR. The position would then depend almost entirely on trading fees generated by $2K of volume against $158K of liquidity.
Because reward-only APR is 0.0% and 100% of yield is fee-derived, incentive expiry would have little direct effect on the current displayed APR. The position would then depend almost entirely on trading fees generated by $2K of volume against $158K of liquidity.
The main risks are AOL price volatility, thin or declining liquidity, and divergence between SOL and AOL prices. This pool has $158K in liquidity, 0.01x turnover, and an EXIT verdict, so it should not be treated like a deep SOL-stablecoin market.
The main risks are AOL price volatility, thin or declining liquidity, and divergence between SOL and AOL prices. This pool has $158K in liquidity, 0.01x turnover, and an EXIT verdict, so it should not be treated like a deep SOL-stablecoin market.
For SOL-AOL, an exit is warranted if the live verdict remains AVOID on successive refreshes, if TVL drains, or if volume no longer supports fee generation. A worsening AOL market or further emission reduction would also weaken the case for remaining in the position.
For SOL-AOL, an exit is warranted if the live verdict remains AVOID on successive refreshes, if TVL drains, or if volume no longer supports fee generation. A worsening AOL market or further emission reduction would also weaken the case for remaining in the position.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is only 0.6% against 0.01x turnover. Any recovery would require sustained trading fees to offset the loss caused by SOL and AOL moving apart.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is only 0.6% against 0.01x turnover. Any recovery would require sustained trading fees to offset the loss caused by SOL and AOL moving apart.
