new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 81/100, producing a live verdict of EXIT. The verdict driver is ai_engine=exit with a strong EXIT signal described as unopposed, and the pool ranks #17236 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. This places SOL-AOL near the bottom of the tracked pool set, consistent with low activity and limited evidence that fees can compensate for memecoin exposure. The assessment would improve with sustained volume growth, higher fee generation, deeper TVL, and evidence that the pool remains usable through emission changes; a TVL drain or collapse in fee yield would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-22 23:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$103.74K
Total value locked
$41.40
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -20.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a pre-set exit rule: monitor the position closely, use a range centered on current SOL/AOL prices, and exit rather than widen the range if either asset leaves the range and trading activity does not recover. Treat a persistent EXIT verdict or a material TVL drain as a reason to close the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $41.40 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.10 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-AOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14011 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20119 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of swap fees, but the pool can leave you with more of the asset that has fallen in value, and the AOL side can be especially volatile.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield consists of 0.1% from swap fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100%. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied data, so the fee component is the only clearly identified source of ongoing yield. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward portion would change independently of trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so the recent path of price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, AOL can experience sharp repricing against SOL, creating inventory imbalance and potential impermanent loss; any emissions can also decay, making exit timing important. The absence of range data argues against assuming that the current fee rate will persist.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid, established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than AOL. SOL price movement changes the pool's SOL/AOL inventory mix; a sustained move in SOL relative to AOL can leave an LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset after rebalancing.
tollAOL Context
AOL is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp AOL decline or a widening AOL-SOL price relationship can increase inventory concentration and make fee income insufficient to offset losses.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of swap fees, but the pool can leave you with more of the asset that has fallen in value, and the AOL side can be especially volatile.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 69ZvRfF9K7c9DsRTouisoeKc7G5Lm1Gz4moKgRjGhsJV
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AOL (2oQNkePa…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR and 0.1% in fee APR. If emissions decay, the reward component falls while fee income remains dependent on trading volume, which is currently represented by 0.00x relative to liquidity.
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR and 0.1% in fee APR. If emissions decay, the reward component falls while fee income remains dependent on trading volume, which is currently represented by 0.00x relative to liquidity.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving trading fees as the identified source of yield. Because 100% is already attributed to fee-based yield, the key question is whether volume can support the remaining 0.1%.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving trading fees as the identified source of yield. Because 100% is already attributed to fee-based yield, the key question is whether volume can support the remaining 0.1%.
The principal risks are AOL price collapse, divergence between SOL and AOL, and insufficient trading volume to offset inventory losses. This pool has $104K in liquidity and $41 in 24-hour volume, while recent range and impermanent-loss history is unavailable.
The principal risks are AOL price collapse, divergence between SOL and AOL, and insufficient trading volume to offset inventory losses. This pool has $104K in liquidity and $41 in 24-hour volume, while recent range and impermanent-loss history is unavailable.
For SOL-AOL, an exit is defensible when the live verdict remains EXIT, trading activity weakens, TVL drains, or AOL leaves the chosen range without a recovery in fees. Emission decay is another exit consideration because the pool belongs to the MEMECOIN family.
For SOL-AOL, an exit is defensible when the live verdict remains EXIT, trading activity weakens, TVL drains, or AOL leaves the chosen range without a recovery in fees. Emission decay is another exit consideration because the pool belongs to the MEMECOIN family.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Fees currently contribute 0.1%, but that rate may not offset divergence between SOL and AOL, particularly while volume remains at 0.00x of liquidity.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Fees currently contribute 0.1%, but that rate may not offset divergence between SOL and AOL, particularly while volume remains at 0.00x of liquidity.
