new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 52/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 47/100, Hold 59/100, and Exit 23/100, supports a conditional hold rather than a strong entry signal. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #621 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. That position indicates the pool is being assessed as middling within the tracked universe: its fee-only structure avoids dependence on rewards, but low turnover and memecoin risk limit the case for adding capital. A TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or collapse in fee APR would change the assessment toward exit; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-09-08 02:24 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$196.90K
Total value locked
$61.58K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up21.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 12.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit rule: withdraw if pool TVL falls materially from your entry level or if fee generation no longer compensates for the observed AOL-SOL price divergence. Because this is a raydium-amm pool without a reported tick-range statistic, use a full-range position rather than relying on a concentrated-range rebalance assumption.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 21.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 19.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $61.58K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $153.96 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-AOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#821 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2132 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOL into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a portion of the trading fees. The value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and AOL if their prices move sharply apart, and the pool’s income depends on actual trading activity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 19.1% from trading fees and 1.9% from rewards. 91% of yield is therefore sourced from trading fees, not incentive emissions. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not presently reducing the displayed APR; fee income will instead vary with volume and liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not reported, so recent price-divergence and range-utilization behavior cannot be quantified from this data set. The low 0.31x means fee production is sensitive to a relatively small trading base. As a MEMECOIN pool, AOL can experience sharp price moves, fragmented liquidity, emission changes, and rapid exit pressure; exit timing matters because liquidity and fee generation can deteriorate before a position is rebalanced.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool provides. SOL price movement relative to AOL determines the pool’s inventory shift and can create impermanent loss when the two assets diverge, even if the fee APR remains unchanged.
tollAOL Context
AOL is the memecoin leg and is likely to contribute most of the pair-specific price and liquidity risk. A sharp AOL move against SOL can change the pool’s token composition and reduce the value of the LP position relative to simply holding the two assets, while weak AOL trading reduces fee generation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOL into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a portion of the trading fees. The value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and AOL if their prices move sharply apart, and the pool’s income depends on actual trading activity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 69ZvRfF9K7c9DsRTouisoeKc7G5Lm1Gz4moKgRjGhsJV
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AOL (2oQNkePa…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
369%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 1.9%, so emission decay is not the source of any present APR reduction. The displayed 21.1% is driven by 19.1%, which depends on trading volume rather than scheduled token emissions.
The current reward component is 1.9%, so emission decay is not the source of any present APR reduction. The displayed 21.1% is driven by 19.1%, which depends on trading volume rather than scheduled token emissions.
The pool already shows 1.9% in reward APR, so expiry would not remove a currently visible reward contribution. If incentives are introduced and later expire, total APR would move toward the fee-only level of 19.1%, unless trading volume changes.
The pool already shows 1.9% in reward APR, so expiry would not remove a currently visible reward contribution. If incentives are introduced and later expire, total APR would move toward the fee-only level of 19.1%, unless trading volume changes.
Risk is elevated because AOL can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss and changing the pool’s token balance. The pool also has $197K of liquidity and $62K of daily volume, so fee income may be sensitive to withdrawals or reduced trading.
Risk is elevated because AOL can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss and changing the pool’s token balance. The pool also has $197K of liquidity and $62K of daily volume, so fee income may be sensitive to withdrawals or reduced trading.
Set the exit before entering and act if pool TVL declines materially, volume weakens, or AOL-SOL price divergence becomes large enough that fees no longer justify the exposure. For this pool, the 0.31x turnover ratio makes a deterioration in trading activity an important exit signal.
Set the exit before entering and act if pool TVL declines materially, volume weakens, or AOL-SOL price divergence becomes large enough that fees no longer justify the exposure. For this pool, the 0.31x turnover ratio makes a deterioration in trading activity an important exit signal.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported and fee income changes with volume. With fee-only yield of 19.1% and turnover of 0.31x, recovery depends on sustained trading fees and whether AOL later converges with SOL.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported and fee income changes with volume. With fee-only yield of 19.1% and turnover of 0.31x, recovery depends on sustained trading fees and whether AOL later converges with SOL.
