Liquidityhelp
lock$10.76K
Total value locked
$164.39
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -97.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored price range and rebalance when the position leaves that range or when fee generation no longer compensates for the expected inventory imbalance; exit if pool liquidity drains or fee APR falls materially from 0.7%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $164.39 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.41 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 JUP-BURN pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14377 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20647 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the JUP-BURN liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JUP and BURN into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 0.7% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of yield is therefore attributed to trading fees, with no current reward component shown. The fee rate depends on volume relative to liquidity and can contract quickly if trading activity or pool depth changes; the dataset does not establish a future reward schedule or reward dependency.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is not currently reported, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, JUP-BURN is exposed to rapid repricing, shallow-liquidity effects, and potentially abrupt exit conditions. Emission decay is not currently the source of stated APR, but any future incentive program would require monitoring its schedule and exiting before fee activity or liquidity deteriorates.
tollJUP Context
JUP is one side of the pair and its price movement relative to BURN determines the inventory mix and impermanent-loss exposure for the LP. The supplied metrics do not establish JUP's liquidity depth elsewhere on Solana; stronger external liquidity could support execution, while a sharp JUP move can leave the LP holding proportionally more of the declining asset.
tollBURN Context
BURN is the other side of this memecoin pair, so its price action directly affects the pool's inventory and the value of collected fees. The supplied metrics do not establish BURN's liquidity depth elsewhere, making thin external liquidity or abrupt repricing relevant considerations for exit timing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JUP and BURN into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6DNBQmyRPZHQ7vnvAJoqp7huZ4z5djPxxecHSijXy4kR
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- JUP (JUPyiwrY…)
- Token B
- BURN (JAtFQn9y…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current stated yield is composed of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so emission decay is not presently the source of APR. If incentives are introduced later, their decay could reduce the reward component, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume and liquidity.
Current stated yield is composed of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so emission decay is not presently the source of APR. If incentives are introduced later, their decay could reduce the reward component, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume and liquidity.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the stated APR is already fee-driven, with 100% attributed to trading fees. If future incentives expire, LP economics would depend primarily on whether volume can sustain 0.7%.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the stated APR is already fee-driven, with 100% attributed to trading fees. If future incentives expire, LP economics would depend primarily on whether volume can sustain 0.7%.
The main risks are rapid JUP-BURN price divergence, thin or changing liquidity, and receiving more of the token that is falling in price. Recent impermanent-loss and range-performance history is not currently reported, so the pool's realized protection against those risks cannot be quantified.
The main risks are rapid JUP-BURN price divergence, thin or changing liquidity, and receiving more of the token that is falling in price. Recent impermanent-loss and range-performance history is not currently reported, so the pool's realized protection against those risks cannot be quantified.
Consider exiting when liquidity drains, trading volume no longer supports 0.7%, the position moves outside its intended range, or either token begins an abrupt repricing. For this pool, an incentive-expiry event would not by itself remove current fee yield, but it could expose any future reward-dependent economics.
Consider exiting when liquidity drains, trading volume no longer supports 0.7%, the position moves outside its intended range, or either token begins an abrupt repricing. For this pool, an incentive-expiry event would not by itself remove current fee yield, but it could expose any future reward-dependent economics.
No reliable fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee generation changes with volume. Under a static-rate assumption, a rough fee-only recovery period would be the inverse of 0.7%, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price divergence, and range management.
No reliable fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee generation changes with volume. Under a static-rate assumption, a rough fee-only recovery period would be the inverse of 0.7%, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price divergence, and range management.
