new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool near the lower end of the raydium-amm set, ranked #1436 of 8541 pools. Its Enter score of 15/100, Hold score of 20/100, and Exit score of 80/100 indicate that the aggregate assessment favors leaving, despite ai_engine=hold, because scanner=CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume relative to TVL, a less severe scanner result, and evidence that liquidity persists after incentives; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or continued inactivity would make it weaker.
Computed 2026-09-04 01:52 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$42.78K
Total value locked
$18.46
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed exit signal as the operational trigger: withdraw if that condition persists while the pool's 0.00x remains depressed, rather than waiting for a reward change or relying on the headline APR.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $18.46 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-MANA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-MANA liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MANA into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but very little trading activity and large price differences between the tokens can leave you with a less favorable asset mix when you withdraw.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the reward component should not be treated as durable; no current reward duration is confirmed. With volume at $18 against $43K of liquidity, fee generation is dependent on activity that is currently limited.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported, so recent loss behavior and concentration within the active price range cannot be evaluated from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-MANA carries heightened demand and liquidity-retention risk: emission decay can remove any temporary incentive support, while falling attention can make exit timing more important than nominal APR. The absence of established lifecycle and persistence data adds uncertainty around how long current activity can last.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pool and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pair. If SOL moves sharply relative to MANA, the pool's asset mix shifts and the LP can hold more of the weaker-performing side after rebalancing, even when swap fees accrue.
tollMANA Context
MANA is the paired asset and is likely to determine much of this pool's memecoin-style demand and liquidity persistence. A sharp MANA move against SOL can increase divergence exposure for the LP, while weak MANA trading activity reduces the fee base available to offset that risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MANA into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but very little trading activity and large price differences between the tokens can leave you with a less favorable asset mix when you withdraw.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6NTeq6b3Lr31EgSkJ6hnhbakWEnwryGN68y4mB91CGCo
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- MANA (Bw5K8eZa…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
APR
103%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. If emissions decline, the reward portion can fall without being replaced because trading activity is currently limited.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. If emissions decline, the reward portion can fall without being replaced because trading activity is currently limited.
The reward component would move toward zero, leaving fee income of 0.0% as the primary remaining source of return. Because 100% of current yield is already fee-funded, the main question is whether $18 of volume can support meaningful fees against $43K of liquidity.
The reward component would move toward zero, leaving fee income of 0.0% as the primary remaining source of return. Because 100% of current yield is already fee-funded, the main question is whether $18 of volume can support meaningful fees against $43K of liquidity.
Risk is elevated because MANA demand and liquidity can change quickly, while SOL has deeper alternative markets and may move independently. This pool also has a 0.00x Vol/TVL ratio and a CRITICAL scanner result, so exiting may become harder or less favorable if activity deteriorates.
Risk is elevated because MANA demand and liquidity can change quickly, while SOL has deeper alternative markets and may move independently. This pool also has a 0.00x Vol/TVL ratio and a CRITICAL scanner result, so exiting may become harder or less favorable if activity deteriorates.
For SOL-MANA, the stated EXIT and unopposed strong EXIT signal are already actionable warning signs. An LP should reassess immediately if the CRITICAL scanner status persists, volume stays weak relative to $43K, or the pool's liquidity begins draining.
For SOL-MANA, the stated EXIT and unopposed strong EXIT signal are already actionable warning signs. An LP should reassess immediately if the CRITICAL scanner status persists, volume stays weak relative to $43K, or the pool's liquidity begins draining.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. The only stated return is 0.0%, and that return depends on 0.0% from limited activity plus 0.0%, so fee income and price divergence should be monitored rather than assuming a fixed recovery period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. The only stated return is 0.0%, and that return depends on 0.0% from limited activity plus 0.0%, so fee income and price divergence should be monitored rather than assuming a fixed recovery period.
