TTWO-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $327.68K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $2.01M 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.20% fee
- Pool address
- 6PTm7MkU…UAPL · observed 2026-11-10
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 57/100 Wealthville Score places this pool in a middle-to-positive assessment: Enter is 54/100, Hold is 60/100, and Exit is 21/100, with live verdict HOLD. The pool ranks #119 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, but the current driver is ai_engine=enter with promotion to ENTER still pending its dwell requirement, so the verdict is not the same as a fully confirmed entry signal. A sustained TVL drain, lower volume-to-TVL, or collapse in fee APR would change the assessment; reward uncertainty or weaker TTWO demand would also reduce the case for remaining exposed.
Computed 2026-11-10 07:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$327.68K
Total value locked
$2.01M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 570.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only while TTWO volume remains elevated, and rebalance or exit after sustained out-of-range trading together with a visible TVL drain or collapse in fee volume; do not treat the quoted APR alone as a re-entry signal.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.01M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $4.92K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 13 TTWO-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#228 of 20367 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1717 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the TTWO-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing TTWO and USDC into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. If TTWO moves sharply or trading activity dries up, the pool can leave you holding a different mix of the two assets and the income can fall.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100%. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee rate is the relevant current source of return; any future emissions would add a separate, potentially time-limited component rather than explain the present fee yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of time spent in range are not currently reported, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be assessed from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, TTWO-USDC carries high price-movement and liquidity-contraction risk; emission decay or incentive expiry can reduce LP demand and make exit timing more important once fee volume falls.
tollTTWO Context
TTWO is the volatile side of this pair and is the primary source of directional exposure for the LP. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here; sharp TTWO moves can create inventory imbalance, fee-generating arbitrage, and impermanent loss relative to simply holding TTWO.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote and relatively stable side of the pair, providing the accounting base for fees and pool value. Its broad Solana liquidity generally supports conversion, but USDC does not remove TTWO price risk; a TTWO decline can leave the LP with more TTWO and less USDC.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing TTWO and USDC into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. If TTWO moves sharply or trading activity dries up, the pool can leave you holding a different mix of the two assets and the income can fall.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6PTm7MkUmtsLU7w6dWrMHJAt8PnzoCgcZdKyTKEhUAPL
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- TTWO (TTWofwAg…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is fee-led: 500.0% comes from fees and 0.0% from rewards, while 100% attributes the yield to trading fees. If emissions decay, the reward component would fall, but the fee component would remain dependent on 6.14x trading activity.
The current return is fee-led: 500.0% comes from fees and 0.0% from rewards, while 100% attributes the yield to trading fees. If emissions decay, the reward component would fall, but the fee component would remain dependent on 6.14x trading activity.
There is no reward-only contribution currently indicated by 0.0%, so expiry would not directly remove the stated fee source. It could still reduce LP participation, liquidity, and trading volume, which would pressure future fee income and make exit timing more important.
There is no reward-only contribution currently indicated by 0.0%, so expiry would not directly remove the stated fee source. It could still reduce LP participation, liquidity, and trading volume, which would pressure future fee income and make exit timing more important.
The main risks are TTWO price volatility, impermanent loss, and a rapid fall in liquidity or trading volume. Because recent IL and range history are not reported, the record does not show how efficiently LPs have historically stayed in range.
The main risks are TTWO price volatility, impermanent loss, and a rapid fall in liquidity or trading volume. Because recent IL and range history are not reported, the record does not show how efficiently LPs have historically stayed in range.
For this pool, an exit signal is sustained TTWO volume deterioration, a TVL drain, or repeated out-of-range trading that reduces fee capture. A sharp change in TTWO liquidity or a collapse in 500.0% would be more relevant than the headline 500.0% alone.
For this pool, an exit signal is sustained TTWO volume deterioration, a TVL drain, or repeated out-of-range trading that reduces fee capture. A sharp change in TTWO liquidity or a collapse in 500.0% would be more relevant than the headline 500.0% alone.
It cannot be estimated reliably without recent IL history, range data, and the future fee path. Break-even depends on whether fees at 500.0% persist long enough to offset the position's asset divergence, not on 500.0% remaining constant.
It cannot be estimated reliably without recent IL history, range data, and the future fee path. Break-even depends on whether fees at 500.0% persist long enough to offset the position's asset divergence, not on 500.0% remaining constant.
