new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 produces Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100 signals, with the live verdict EXIT and the listed driver ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #409 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it relatively high in the pool set, but that ranking does not change the pool's low-activity, fee-dependent profile. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee generation, or worsening SCF liquidity would weaken the assessment; sustained volume growth without a comparable rise in TVL would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-09-17 10:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$203.24K
Total value locked
$105.14
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -4.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range that can tolerate the expected SOL/SCF volatility, and set an explicit exit rule for a sustained drop in pool volume or TVL. Rebalance only when price leaves the chosen range; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if SCF liquidity or trading activity is visibly deteriorating.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $105.14 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.26 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-SCF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13604 of 67260 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 17% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19303 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SCF liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCF into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your final holdings can differ from simply holding SOL and SCF, especially if SCF's price moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR is 0.1%, composed of 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution to offset weaker volume. Reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established, which limits confidence in forward yield beyond realized trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of time spent in range are not available, so historical price-impact and range-efficiency conclusions cannot be quantified. SOL-SCF is a MEMECOIN pool: SCF price shocks, declining attention, and rapid liquidity exits can increase inventory divergence and reduce fee generation. Emission decay is not currently the main yield risk because the reward component is absent, but exit timing matters if volume or liquidity deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than SCF. SOL price movement changes the pool's relative inventory: a sustained move against SCF can leave an LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset than a passive hold would. Broader SOL liquidity can make SOL-side rebalancing easier, but it does not remove pair-level impermanent loss.
tollSCF Context
SCF is the memecoin-side asset and is the primary idiosyncratic risk in this pair. Its liquidity elsewhere may be thinner and its price action may be driven by attention, listings, or holder concentration rather than broad market factors. A sharp SCF move or loss of market interest can widen LP inventory divergence and reduce the swaps that generate fees.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCF into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your final holdings can differ from simply holding SOL and SCF, especially if SCF's price moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6USpEBbN94DUYLUi4a2wo3AZDCyozon1PLGYu27jzPkX
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SCF (GiG7Hr61…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
81%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool's total APR is 0.1%, with 0.0% from rewards and 0.1% from fees. Because the reward component is absent, emission decay does not currently reduce the stated reward contribution; future APR remains mainly dependent on trading fees.
The pool's total APR is 0.1%, with 0.0% from rewards and 0.1% from fees. Because the reward component is absent, emission decay does not currently reduce the stated reward contribution; future APR remains mainly dependent on trading fees.
The pool already shows a reward component of 0.0%, so expiry of additional incentives would not remove a current reward stream from the stated APR. Fee income would remain at 0.1% only if trading activity continues, and it could fall if incentive-driven liquidity or volume leaves.
The pool already shows a reward component of 0.0%, so expiry of additional incentives would not remove a current reward stream from the stated APR. Fee income would remain at 0.1% only if trading activity continues, and it could fall if incentive-driven liquidity or volume leaves.
Risk is driven by both SOL/SCF price divergence and SCF-specific liquidity or attention loss. This pool has TVL of $203K, 24h volume of $105, and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.00x, so fee generation depends on a relatively limited level of observed trading activity.
Risk is driven by both SOL/SCF price divergence and SCF-specific liquidity or attention loss. This pool has TVL of $203K, 24h volume of $105, and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.00x, so fee generation depends on a relatively limited level of observed trading activity.
For SOL-SCF, an exit rule should focus on persistent volume or TVL deterioration, SCF liquidity loss, or price remaining outside your selected range. Do not rely on emissions as an exit timetable because the current reward component is 0.0% and reward dependency is not established.
For SOL-SCF, an exit rule should focus on persistent volume or TVL deterioration, SCF liquidity loss, or price remaining outside your selected range. Do not rely on emissions as an exit timetable because the current reward component is 0.0% and reward dependency is not established.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and time-in-range data are unavailable. The fee-only annualized rate is 0.1%, but realized fees must be compared with the actual SOL/SCF price divergence and the duration of the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and time-in-range data are unavailable. The fee-only annualized rate is 0.1%, but realized fees must be compared with the actual SOL/SCF price divergence and the duration of the position.
