WealthVille
SOL
S
XCHAT
X

SOL-XCHATon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $26.77K
APR
2.0% APR
24h Volume
$255.15 24h vol
Pool address
6aE8jwogp3SM · observed 2026-08-26
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1346 among 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools, but the score does not remove the implications of a small liquidity base and low trading activity. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee income collapses, or XCHAT liquidity deteriorates; it would improve if sustained volume raises fee generation without a comparable increase in price-divergence risk.

Computed 2026-08-25 22:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$26.77K

Total value locked

$255.15

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

2.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-4.1%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 219m agoTVL 0.3%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleStrong stable income score: 100/100
check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 70/100
tips_and_updates

Set a precommitted exit rule based on fee coverage: leave the position if volume remains weak while TVL drains or if XCHAT diverges sharply from SOL without a corresponding increase in fee generation. Because range utilization is not reported, avoid relying on an unverified narrow tick range.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR2.0%
Fee APR1.9%
Volume$255.15
Fees Earned$0.64

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
1.4%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−5.5%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-4.1%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.01x(protocol avg 5.4x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 SOL-XCHAT pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#2152 of 55835 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 5% of all Solana pools

overall rank #4824 of 98856

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-XCHAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XCHAT into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amounts of each token you own can change, and the combined value can underperform simply holding the tokens if their prices move apart.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 1.9% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% means the displayed return depends on trading activity rather than farm emissions. Reward duration is not established, so LPs should not treat any future incentive as a durable component of returns.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and tick-in-range reporting is unavailable, so neither recent price divergence nor range utilization can be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-XCHAT carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and emission-decay risk; exit timing matters because a subsidy can end before trading fees compensate for token divergence.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana. SOL price moves against XCHAT change the pool composition and can create impermanent loss even when the pool continues generating fees.

tollXCHAT Context

XCHAT is the less-established, memecoin-side asset in this pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and nearby venues. A sharp XCHAT move or thinning external liquidity can increase inventory imbalance and make an orderly LP exit more difficult.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XCHAT into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amounts of each token you own can change, and the combined value can underperform simply holding the tokens if their prices move apart.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

XCHAT
XCHATXChatSolana
Explorer

XChat (XCHAT) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
6aE8jwogq83TVWTk2uBUrpEjPyPr2GVE9Cb3vxp1p3SM
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
XCHAT (DdGQ5ocQ…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current return is composed of 1.9% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% from trading fees. If future incentives decay, the total APR will rely increasingly on trading volume rather than emissions.

The current return is composed of 1.9% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% from trading fees. If future incentives decay, the total APR will rely increasingly on trading volume rather than emissions.

The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the basis for returns. For SOL-XCHAT, that means the remaining reference point is 1.9%, while actual realized fees will vary with $255 and pool liquidity.

The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the basis for returns. For SOL-XCHAT, that means the remaining reference point is 1.9%, while actual realized fees will vary with $255 and pool liquidity.

Risk is elevated because XCHAT can move sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and memecoin incentives can decay or end quickly. The pool has $27K TVL and a 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization reporting is unavailable.

Risk is elevated because XCHAT can move sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and memecoin incentives can decay or end quickly. The pool has $27K TVL and a 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization reporting is unavailable.

Exit when the fee stream no longer compensates for worsening liquidity or SOL-XCHAT price divergence. A TVL drain, persistent volume deterioration, incentive decay, or difficulty exiting XCHAT are concrete signals to reassess rather than waiting for a nominal APR to recover.

Exit when the fee stream no longer compensates for worsening liquidity or SOL-XCHAT price divergence. A TVL drain, persistent volume deterioration, incentive decay, or difficulty exiting XCHAT are concrete signals to reassess rather than waiting for a nominal APR to recover.

There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and future volume and prices are uncertain. Ignoring price divergence, a simple fee-only payback estimate would be one divided by 1.9% years, but that is not a forecast of realized LP returns.

There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and future volume and prices are uncertain. Ignoring price divergence, a simple fee-only payback estimate would be one divided by 1.9% years, but that is not a forecast of realized LP returns.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights