new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter 40/100, Hold 48/100, and Exit 34/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #62 among 889 meteora-damm-v2 pools places it relatively high within this pool set, but the score does not mean the position is low risk: it reflects a fee-funded APR alongside limited pool activity and unresolved memecoin and range risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume collapsed, the fee-funded APR fell sharply, or sustained liquidity and trading activity improved without a corresponding increase in price risk.
Computed 2026-09-20 18:34 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$49.91K
Total value locked
$41.32K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up191.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 238.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor actively and set a hard rebalance or exit trigger for a sustained move outside the active ticks; if ZERA liquidity thins or the pool's fee generation falls materially below the current rate, withdraw rather than waiting for a memecoin rebound.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 191.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 107.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $41.32K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $331.98 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 ZERA-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#46 of 2034 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1351 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ZERA-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZERA and SOL into a shared pool that traders use, while the pool gives you a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward ZERA or SOL as prices move, and the value you withdraw can be lower than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
ZERA-SOL decomposes its yield into a fee-only APR of 107.2% and a reward-only APR of 84.5%. Fee sustainability is 56%, so the stated APR currently depends on trading fees rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established, and there is no current reward component to support the APR if fee generation weakens.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range history are not available, so the pool's realized rebalancing burden cannot be assessed from those measures. Range exposure still matters: a sharp ZERA or SOL move can push the position out of its active ticks and leave the LP holding a larger share of the weaker-performing asset. As a MEMECOIN pool, ZERA-SOL also carries emission-decay and exit-timing risk: sentiment can reverse quickly, while thin liquidity can make leaving costly even when the quoted APR remains unchanged.
tollZERA Context
ZERA is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement is the main source of inventory divergence for the LP. Liquidity depth for ZERA outside this pool is not established here; a rapid fall in ZERA demand can therefore increase slippage and leave the LP with more ZERA after rebalancing.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the base-asset side of the pair and has broader market use than ZERA, but that does not prevent SOL volatility from moving the position outside its active range. When SOL appreciates sharply against ZERA, the AMM can sell SOL from the LP inventory and leave the position more concentrated in ZERA.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZERA and SOL into a shared pool that traders use, while the pool gives you a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward ZERA or SOL as prices move, and the value you withdraw can be lower than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6oUJD1EHNVBNMeTpytmY2NxKWicz5C2JUbByUrHEsjhc
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- ZERA (8avjtjHA…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
3%
APR
13%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 84.5%, while fee-only APR is 107.2%, so the stated 191.7% APR is not currently supported by emissions. If incentives are introduced and later decay, that reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 84.5%, while fee-only APR is 107.2%, so the stated 191.7% APR is not currently supported by emissions. If incentives are introduced and later decay, that reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward component in the stated APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove part of the present yield calculation. The position would continue to rely on trading fees of 107.2%, which can decline if volume falls.
There is no current reward component in the stated APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove part of the present yield calculation. The position would continue to rely on trading fees of 107.2%, which can decline if volume falls.
The risk is material because ZERA can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established, and the pool's 0.83x ratio indicates limited recent trading activity. Fee sustainability is 56%, but fee income does not protect against impermanent loss, out-of-range exposure, or difficult exits.
The risk is material because ZERA can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established, and the pool's 0.83x ratio indicates limited recent trading activity. Fee sustainability is 56%, but fee income does not protect against impermanent loss, out-of-range exposure, or difficult exits.
For ZERA-SOL, consider exiting when ZERA liquidity or demand deteriorates, when the position remains outside its active ticks, or when fee generation no longer justifies the inventory and exit risk. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in the fee-only APR of 107.2% would weaken the case for staying.
For ZERA-SOL, consider exiting when ZERA liquidity or demand deteriorates, when the position remains outside its active ticks, or when fee generation no longer justifies the inventory and exit risk. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in the fee-only APR of 107.2% would weaken the case for staying.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable. With fee-only APR of 107.2%, fees would need to offset the realized price divergence, and that process could be prolonged if ZERA volatility rises or trading volume remains low.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable. With fee-only APR of 107.2%, fees would need to offset the realized price divergence, and that process could be prolonged if ZERA volatility rises or trading volume remains low.
