new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 46/100 with Enter at 40/100, Hold at 54/100, and Exit at 27/100; the highest subscore is Hold, while the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #444 of 2403 raydium-amm pools places it above most listed pools by rank, but that does not remove the small-pool and memecoin risks reflected by $65K and 0.06x. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses; it would improve only if trading activity and liquidity deepen without relying on temporary incentives.
Computed 2026-07-24 06:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$65.30K
Total value locked
$3.61K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 3.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a predefined exit or rebalance trigger for a sustained decline in SOL-UNITY volume relative to its current 0.06x turnover, or when fee income no longer justifies the pool's memecoin exposure. Do not widen or maintain a concentrated range solely because the displayed APR remains at 3.8%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $3.61K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $9.03 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-UNITY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1334 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3611 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-UNITY liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and UNITY into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and UNITY if their prices move differently or UNITY liquidity disappears.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 3.7% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 98%, so the stated APR is dependent on continued swap activity rather than an emissions schedule. With no reward component currently contributing, emission decay is not the primary APR risk; declining volume or liquidity would reduce fee income.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available for this pool, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so the realized IL and range-management burden cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-UNITY is exposed to sharp UNITY repricing, attention decay, and liquidity withdrawal; those effects can make exit timing more important than the nominal fee APR. The pool's lifecycle is not established, so an LP should not assume that current activity will persist.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool provides. SOL price moves against UNITY change the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss for LPs, while SOL's broader liquidity can make the pair easier to exit than a two-memecoin pool.
tollUNITY Context
UNITY is the pool's memecoin exposure and is likely to determine most of the pair's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. A sharp UNITY move against SOL can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset, while a decline in UNITY trading interest can reduce fee generation and make exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and UNITY into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and UNITY if their prices move differently or UNITY liquidity disappears.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6oWHuR7vHbuVbg6FuhhBUmAeUKMEDrLzcyde8DbwEeFt
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- UNITY (EdhTCqUx…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently the main APR driver because rewards contribute 0.1% and fee sustainability is 98%. The more immediate risk is lower trading activity reducing 3.7% and therefore 3.8%.
Emission decay is not currently the main APR driver because rewards contribute 0.1% and fee sustainability is 98%. The more immediate risk is lower trading activity reducing 3.7% and therefore 3.8%.
Because the reward component is 0.1%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove a material current reward stream. Future APR would still depend primarily on trading fees, represented by 3.7% and 98%, assuming volume and liquidity remain adequate.
Because the reward component is 0.1%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove a material current reward stream. Future APR would still depend primarily on trading fees, represented by 3.7% and 98%, assuming volume and liquidity remain adequate.
The risk is material because UNITY can move sharply or lose trading liquidity while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. The pool's fee-based 3.8% does not compensate automatically for impermanent loss, price divergence, or difficulty exiting a small pool with $65K.
The risk is material because UNITY can move sharply or lose trading liquidity while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. The pool's fee-based 3.8% does not compensate automatically for impermanent loss, price divergence, or difficulty exiting a small pool with $65K.
Use a predefined rule tied to weakening volume, falling liquidity, or a sustained decline in fee income rather than waiting for a visible collapse. For SOL-UNITY, a deterioration from the current 0.06x or loss of confidence in UNITY's liquidity is a defensible exit signal.
Use a predefined rule tied to weakening volume, falling liquidity, or a sustained decline in fee income rather than waiting for a visible collapse. For SOL-UNITY, a deterioration from the current 0.06x or loss of confidence in UNITY's liquidity is a defensible exit signal.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because a seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. At 3.8%, recovery depends on sustained realization of 3.7% and on SOL and UNITY prices moving in a way that does not deepen the LP's divergence loss.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because a seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. At 3.8%, recovery depends on sustained realization of 3.7% and on SOL and UNITY prices moving in a way that does not deepen the LP's divergence loss.
