new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 55/100 gives this pool a live HOLD assessment, with Enter at 49/100, Hold at 62/100, and Exit at 20/100. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the current balance of fee production, liquidity, and risk is judged more suitable for retaining than initiating or immediately closing, while its #85 of 8541 raydium-amm rank places it well above most listed pools on the supplied ranking. That does not make the return durable: a TVL drain, sustained volume deterioration, collapse in 56.7%, or materially worse $HACHI liquidity would change the assessment toward exit; stronger and persistent fee production with stable liquidity would support continued holding.
Computed 2026-09-09 07:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$41.93K
Total value locked
$25.38K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up76.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 69.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Record the pool's TVL and volume-to-TVL ratio when entering, and reduce or exit if TVL falls below one-half of that baseline or if fee generation weakens while $HACHI volatility remains elevated. Because this is a constant-product raydium-amm pool, use position size and an exit trigger rather than a tick range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 76.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 56.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $25.38K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $63.45 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 14 SOL-$HACHI pools
by AI Farmer Score
#553 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1432 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$HACHI liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $HACHI into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that performs worse, and $HACHI may be difficult to sell quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 56.7% and a reward-only APR of 19.5%. Fee sustainability is 74%, so the stated return depends on continued trading activity rather than a currently quantified incentive schedule. Reward dependency and reward duration are not established, making any future emission contribution uncertain.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so short-term loss history and range exposure cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, $HACHI can experience abrupt price gaps, thin exit liquidity, and one-sided inventory accumulation; any emissions should be treated as decay-prone, while exit timing matters because fee income may fall before liquidity leaves. The pool's small liquidity base also means individual trades can have a disproportionate effect on price and fees.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more broadly traded asset in this pair and provides the pool's main reference liquidity. If SOL appreciates or falls materially relative to $HACHI, the automated pool rebalances the assets, which can leave an LP holding more of the weaker-performing token than a passive wallet would. SOL's broader liquidity elsewhere can make its price formation more robust than that of the paired memecoin, but it does not remove pool-level impermanent loss.
toll$HACHI Context
$HACHI is the idiosyncratic and likely less liquid leg of this MEMECOIN pair, so its price can be driven by concentrated holders, sentiment, and fragmented venues. A sharp $HACHI move can cause the pool to accumulate $HACHI as arbitrageurs trade against it, while a liquidity withdrawal can make exits more costly. LPs should assess whether they are willing to hold additional $HACHI inventory if the pair moves against it.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $HACHI into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that performs worse, and $HACHI may be difficult to sell quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6qJqDaYUMHkda55jP8h48FV2r7ejMFfudCFmY6z9a6uh
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- $HACHI (x95HN3DW…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool's stated return is split between 56.7% in fees and 19.5% in rewards, with 74% of yield coming from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so any future emission decay could reduce the reward component without changing fee income.
The pool's stated return is split between 56.7% in fees and 19.5% in rewards, with 74% of yield coming from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so any future emission decay could reduce the reward component without changing fee income.
If incentives expire or decline, the reward-only component would fall from 19.5% toward whatever trading fees support. Since 74% already identifies fees as the source of current yield, the main remaining variable would be whether the pool's 0.61x activity continues.
If incentives expire or decline, the reward-only component would fall from 19.5% toward whatever trading fees support. Since 74% already identifies fees as the source of current yield, the main remaining variable would be whether the pool's 0.61x activity continues.
Risk is high relative to a large, established-asset pool because $HACHI can gap, lose liquidity, or become the dominant asset in your withdrawal balance. This pool also has $42K of liquidity, so price impact and exit conditions deserve more attention than the headline 76.2%.
Risk is high relative to a large, established-asset pool because $HACHI can gap, lose liquidity, or become the dominant asset in your withdrawal balance. This pool also has $42K of liquidity, so price impact and exit conditions deserve more attention than the headline 76.2%.
Use a precommitted trigger tied to this pool: reduce or exit if TVL falls below one-half of its entry level, fee production weakens materially, or $HACHI liquidity deteriorates. Do not wait for a reward schedule to recover the position when the underlying trading activity is declining.
Use a precommitted trigger tied to this pool: reduce or exit if TVL falls below one-half of its entry level, fee production weakens materially, or $HACHI liquidity deteriorates. Do not wait for a reward schedule to recover the position when the underlying trading activity is declining.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Fees at 56.7% could offset losses over time, but that requires sustained volume and does not protect against a rapid $HACHI move or an illiquid exit.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Fees at 56.7% could offset losses over time, but that requires sustained volume and does not protect against a rapid $HACHI move or an illiquid exit.
