new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 52/100, with Enter at 46/100, Hold at 59/100, and Exit at 22/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, which supports maintaining an existing position only with monitoring rather than treating the score as a new-entry signal. The pool ranks #51 of 889 meteora-damm-v2 pools, but that rank does not remove memecoin price, liquidity, or APR-decay risk. A sustained TVL drain, material decline in fee generation, or loss of trading activity would change the assessment toward exit; a durable increase in volume and liquidity without worsening price volatility could improve it.
Computed 2026-09-06 01:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$219.72K
Total value locked
$16.26K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up111.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 29.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a pre-set review rule: if 24-hour volume falls below the current 0.07x relationship to TVL for three consecutive days, reassess or exit rather than relying on the displayed APR; use a narrower range only if you can monitor and rebalance it actively.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 111.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 74.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $16.26K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $528.15 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USWS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#71 of 1856 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1664 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USWS-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USWS and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large USWS price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker asset than if you had simply held both tokens separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 74.9% and a reward-only APR of 36.4%. 67% of yield is attributed to trading fees, so the displayed APR depends on continued swap activity rather than disclosed farm emissions. Reward duration is not established, and the pool's MEMECOIN classification makes emission decay and abrupt volume changes relevant to forward APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and seven-day tick-in-range coverage is also not available, so recent price-path and range-utilization risk cannot be quantified from these metrics. USWS exposure remains material because a sharp move in either direction can leave the LP holding a larger share of the underperforming asset while fees may not offset the divergence. As a MEMECOIN pool, emissions can decay quickly and exit timing matters: leaving after liquidity or trading activity deteriorates may be more important than waiting for a headline APR to persist.
tollUSWS Context
USWS is the volatile memecoin side of this pair, while USDC provides the accounting reference and stable side of the position. The supplied metrics do not establish USWS liquidity depth elsewhere, so a large USWS price move or thin external liquidity could increase execution cost and alter the LP's asset mix. USWS appreciation generally causes the position to sell USWS into strength, while USWS depreciation can leave the LP with more USWS.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable settlement asset in this pool and generally represents the lower-volatility side of the pair. The supplied metrics do not establish USDC-specific liquidity depth outside this pool, although USDC itself is typically more liquid than a memecoin. USWS price movement determines how much of the LP position remains in USDC versus USWS and therefore drives most inventory divergence risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USWS and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large USWS price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker asset than if you had simply held both tokens separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 71E2j2oNZaBJEqji2aEyCb8J3innDhUTgYCXPPsMFXS3
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- USWS (8e1sqPsX…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 8/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
5%
APR
7%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 36.4%, while fee-only APR is 74.9% and Total APR is 111.3%. Because the stated yield is fee-sourced at 67%, emission decay is not currently the reported source of APR, but future incentives could change and should not be assumed to persist.
The current reward-only APR is 36.4%, while fee-only APR is 74.9% and Total APR is 111.3%. Because the stated yield is fee-sourced at 67%, emission decay is not currently the reported source of APR, but future incentives could change and should not be assumed to persist.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall away; the relevant current reward-only figure is 36.4%. Trading fees would remain the basis for yield, currently represented by fee-only APR 74.9%, but that income depends on continued USWS-USDC volume.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall away; the relevant current reward-only figure is 36.4%. Trading fees would remain the basis for yield, currently represented by fee-only APR 74.9%, but that income depends on continued USWS-USDC volume.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because USWS can move sharply and liquidity may be less resilient. TVL is $220K, 24-hour volume is $16K, and the available metrics do not provide a recent seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range reading, so the price and range risks cannot be fully quantified.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because USWS can move sharply and liquidity may be less resilient. TVL is $220K, 24-hour volume is $16K, and the available metrics do not provide a recent seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range reading, so the price and range risks cannot be fully quantified.
Use objective signals rather than the headline APR: reassess if volume weakens materially relative to 0.07x, TVL begins draining, or fee-only APR falls from 74.9%. A sharp USWS move that pushes the position toward an undesired inventory mix is also a valid exit or rebalance trigger.
Use objective signals rather than the headline APR: reassess if volume weakens materially relative to 0.07x, TVL begins draining, or fee-only APR falls from 74.9%. A sharp USWS move that pushes the position toward an undesired inventory mix is also a valid exit or rebalance trigger.
It cannot be estimated reliably from the supplied data because recent impermanent loss and price-path history are unavailable. The simple fee-only comparison would use 74.9% against the eventual loss from USWS price divergence, but 74.9% is an annualized run rate and can fall as volume changes.
It cannot be estimated reliably from the supplied data because recent impermanent loss and price-path history are unavailable. The simple fee-only comparison would use 74.9% against the eventual loss from USWS price divergence, but 74.9% is an annualized run rate and can fall as volume changes.
