new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 46/100 places this pool below the Enter threshold of 40/100 and below the Hold score of 53/100, while the Exit score is 27/100. Its live verdict is HOLD: the AI engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong exit signal is unopposed. At rank #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, the pool is not at the bottom of the set, but its low turnover and memecoin-specific liquidity risk do not justify treating the rank as a quality signal. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume, deeper TVL, and a non-critical scanner result; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-11 15:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.74K
Total value locked
$1.55K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -8.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, set a hard review rule to exit if TVL falls 20% from the entry level or if the scanner remains CRITICAL at the next review; do not widen exposure to compensate for falling fees.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.55K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.87 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-ANON pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1843 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4766 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ANON liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ANON into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. You can end up with more of the falling token, and the current pool's small size means fees may not compensate for that price risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives, with 99%. Because the current return is fee-derived rather than reward-derived, APR depends on trading activity continuing at a level that supports the present fee rate; the 0.04x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicates limited turnover relative to the capital in the pool. No reward-duration estimate is used here.
shieldRisk Assessment
Reported seven-day impermanent loss is N/A, while seven-day tick-in-range data is N/A, so recent price-path and range-efficiency evidence is limited. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ANON carries token-specific price collapse, liquidity withdrawal, and adverse-selection risk in addition to ordinary divergence between SOL and ANON. Emission decay and exit timing matter even though the current reward contribution is 0.0%: any incentive support can weaken, while memecoin liquidity can disappear faster than fees can offset losses.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than ANON. SOL price moves relative to ANON determine the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for the LP, particularly during a one-sided ANON repricing or a broad SOL move.
tollANON Context
ANON is the less liquid memecoin leg, so its price discovery and exit liquidity are central risks for this position. A sharp ANON decline can leave the LP holding more ANON while the pool's fee income remains tied to only $2K of daily trading activity.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ANON into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. You can end up with more of the falling token, and the current pool's small size means fees may not compensate for that price risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 75E1rPyFjRw9TjGNiHRw885DYCgRkvsZsMQbkRm5HHNf
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ANON (A53BzB72…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 1.4% is presently driven by 1.4% rather than emissions. If incentives are reduced further, only trading fees would remain, and those depend on the pool's 0.04x turnover.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 1.4% is presently driven by 1.4% rather than emissions. If incentives are reduced further, only trading fees would remain, and those depend on the pool's 0.04x turnover.
Because rewards currently contribute 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful current reward stream, but it would eliminate any remaining incentive support. The resulting return would rely on 1.4% and the pool's $2K trading volume.
Because rewards currently contribute 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful current reward stream, but it would eliminate any remaining incentive support. The resulting return would rely on 1.4% and the pool's $2K trading volume.
Risk is high because ANON can reprice sharply, liquidity can leave quickly, and SOL and ANON can diverge. The pool also has only $36K TVL, 0.04x turnover, and a live HOLD assessment.
Risk is high because ANON can reprice sharply, liquidity can leave quickly, and SOL and ANON can diverge. The pool also has only $36K TVL, 0.04x turnover, and a live HOLD assessment.
For SOL-ANON, a persistent CRITICAL scanner result, an unopposed exit signal, a 20% TVL decline from entry, or a material reduction in fee activity are concrete exit conditions. The current live verdict is HOLD.
For SOL-ANON, a persistent CRITICAL scanner result, an unopposed exit signal, a 20% TVL decline from entry, or a material reduction in fee activity are concrete exit conditions. The current live verdict is HOLD.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because the reported seven-day impermanent-loss history is N/A and fee income can vary with volume. At 1.4% fee yield, recovery depends on future trading activity and whether SOL and ANON return toward their entry price relationship.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because the reported seven-day impermanent-loss history is N/A and fee income can vary with volume. At 1.4% fee yield, recovery depends on future trading activity and whether SOL and ANON return toward their entry price relationship.
