new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 49/100, with Enter at 45/100, Hold at 54/100, and Exit at 28/100. The live verdict is HOLD, and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #967 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, the pool is not being treated as an extreme outlier by the ranking, but the score does not remove its concentration, liquidity, or memecoin risks. A sustained TVL drain, lower trading volume, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; improved and persistent volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-08-23 21:11 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$45.97K
Total value locked
$34.48K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up91.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -52.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a defined price range around the current SOL-to-LOCKEDIN price and rebalance when price leaves that range; exit rather than widening the range if volume falls enough that fee accrual no longer compensates for continued memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 91.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 65.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $34.48K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $86.20 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-LOCKEDIN pools
by AI Farmer Score
#487 of 53795 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #867 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LOCKEDIN liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LOCKEDIN into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the trading fees. Your holdings change as traders buy and sell, so you can end up with less of the asset that rises sharply, and the fee income can fall if trading activity slows.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 65.0% fee APR and 26.5% reward APR, with 71% of yield sourced from trading fees. No current reward contribution is supporting the quoted APR, so emission decay is not the immediate driver; the main variable is whether trading volume remains sufficient to generate fees. For a MEMECOIN pool, fee income can fall quickly when attention and turnover decline, and there is no established reward schedule to use for exit timing.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent inventory divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. The MEMECOIN classification adds abrupt price moves, shallow liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity; those conditions can increase adverse rebalancing and make fee income less persistent. With no current reward APR, the relevant exit risk is a deterioration in volume or liquidity rather than the scheduled expiration of an active incentive program.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the settlement and liquidity-side asset in this pool and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than a single SOL-memecoin pool. If SOL appreciates or depreciates sharply against LOCKEDIN, the AMM rebalances the position, leaving the LP with a different SOL-to-LOCKEDIN mix than a passive holding would.
tollLOCKEDIN Context
LOCKEDIN is the memecoin-side asset, so its price discovery and liquidity conditions are more specific to this pool and its surrounding markets. A sharp LOCKEDIN move can create substantial inventory divergence for LPs, while a loss of external liquidity can increase slippage and make exiting the position more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LOCKEDIN into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the trading fees. Your holdings change as traders buy and sell, so you can end up with less of the asset that rises sharply, and the fee income can fall if trading activity slows.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7F4u5Q992F3aSuVdmJCHSbx5TZHAwBxmco7ik9KSyAxB
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LOCKEDIN (GVZr8f8y…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
46%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
168%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 26.5%, while fee income is 65.0% and represents 71% of the displayed APR. Emission decay therefore does not currently reduce the quoted yield directly; volume and fee generation are the main variables.
The current reward contribution is 26.5%, while fee income is 65.0% and represents 71% of the displayed APR. Emission decay therefore does not currently reduce the quoted yield directly; volume and fee generation are the main variables.
There is no current reward APR shown, so the pool is already reliant on trading fees rather than an active incentive stream. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining yield would be determined by fee APR 65.0% and whether trading volume supports it.
There is no current reward APR shown, so the pool is already reliant on trading fees rather than an active incentive stream. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining yield would be determined by fee APR 65.0% and whether trading volume supports it.
Risk is elevated because LOCKEDIN can move sharply against SOL, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool's TVL is $46K relative to $34K in daily volume. The current 91.5% APR is fee-funded, but it is not protection against impermanent loss, price gaps, or difficulty exiting.
Risk is elevated because LOCKEDIN can move sharply against SOL, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool's TVL is $46K relative to $34K in daily volume. The current 91.5% APR is fee-funded, but it is not protection against impermanent loss, price gaps, or difficulty exiting.
Consider exiting when volume or liquidity deteriorates enough that fee income no longer compensates for continued SOL-to-LOCKEDIN exposure, or when price leaves your defined range and the position becomes heavily concentrated in one token. A weakening fee APR from 65.0% or a decline from the current 0.75x activity level would be relevant warning signals.
Consider exiting when volume or liquidity deteriorates enough that fee income no longer compensates for continued SOL-to-LOCKEDIN exposure, or when price leaves your defined range and the position becomes heavily concentrated in one token. A weakening fee APR from 65.0% or a decline from the current 0.75x activity level would be relevant warning signals.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, and fee income varies with trading activity. The quoted 91.5% is an annualized rate rather than a guaranteed recovery schedule; break-even depends on future fees and how far SOL and LOCKEDIN prices diverge.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, and fee income varies with trading activity. The quoted 91.5% is an annualized rate rather than a guaranteed recovery schedule; break-even depends on future fees and how far SOL and LOCKEDIN prices diverge.
