WealthVille
GNOME
G
GP
G

GNOME-GPon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $5.03K
APR
0.6% APR
24h Volume
$14.13 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
7HeQ9A8D…djgR · observed 2026-10-26
7F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 71% confidence

ai_engine=exitscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter7

new capital

Hold7

keep position

Exit93

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 7/100, with Enter at 7/100, Hold at 7/100, and Exit at 93/100; the live verdict is EXIT. Its rank of #2062 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it well below the stronger part of the protocol set, consistent with a 81/100 risk score and the stated combination of high risk and weak yield. The assessment would improve only if durable fee volume, deeper TVL, and better verified LP outcomes offset the risk; a TVL drain or collapse in fee generation would make it worse.

Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$5.03K

Total value locked

$14.13

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -15.6%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 272m agoTVL ↓1.8%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 81/100
tips_and_updates

Use a monitored position rather than an unattended one: set an exit review if TVL declines from $5K, fee volume no longer supports the current 0.00x volume-to-TVL reading, or GNOME and GP begin sustained one-sided movement. With no verified range data, avoid assuming a passive tick range will remain effective.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.6%——
Fee APR0.6%——
Volume$14.13——
Fees Earned$0.04——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
8.5%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−24.1%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-15.6%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 2.3x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 GNOME-GP pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#14896 of 91854 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 15% of all Solana pools

overall rank #21328 of 148664

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GNOME-GP liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing GNOME and GP into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the value can fall if either memecoin moves sharply or trading activity dries up.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

GNOME-GP decomposes into 0.6% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the stated return depends on trading activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established; any future incentive program would be additive but should not be assumed when assessing current income.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-in-range data are not available, so recent loss history and range utilization cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GNOME-GP is exposed to abrupt price divergence, shallow liquidity effects, and rapid changes in trading activity. Emission decay is not currently the primary APR risk because rewards contribute no reported yield, but exit timing remains important if volume or liquidity contracts.

tollGNOME Context

GNOME is one side of the pool and its price changes directly affect the asset mix an LP holds after rebalancing. Cross-venue liquidity depth for GNOME is not established here, so a sharp move or limited external liquidity could increase slippage and impermanent loss. GNOME price strength relative to GP can leave the LP with more GP exposure after arbitrage.

tollGP Context

GP is the other pool asset, and its relative price performance determines how the position is rebalanced between GNOME and GP. Cross-venue liquidity depth for GP is not established here, so price discovery may be sensitive to this pool's $5K liquidity base. A GP selloff or rally against GNOME can change the LP inventory and reduce the value of fee income relative to passive holding.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing GNOME and GP into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the value can fall if either memecoin moves sharply or trading activity dries up.

token

Token Details

GNOME
GNOMESolana
Explorer

GNOME is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

GP
GPSolana
Explorer

GP is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
7HeQ9A8DcT5jBsx1rCeT7VZhLEgNaqKYevnxR5iLdjgR
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
GNOME (GCjgZ2X4…)
Token B
GP (HTmQz7My…)
Created
9/18/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Current reported yield is 0.6%, composed of 0.6% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, so emission decay is not currently reducing the stated reward component. If incentives are introduced later, their decline would reduce APR without directly changing fee income.

Current reported yield is 0.6%, composed of 0.6% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, so emission decay is not currently reducing the stated reward component. If incentives are introduced later, their decline would reduce APR without directly changing fee income.

The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the relevant return. For GNOME-GP, that means evaluating 0.6% and 100% rather than treating 0.6% as persistent.

The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the relevant return. For GNOME-GP, that means evaluating 0.6% and 100% rather than treating 0.6% as persistent.

Risk is high, reflected by 81/100, because both assets can move abruptly and external liquidity depth is not established. The pool's $5K liquidity base and 0.00x turnover may support fees, but they do not remove impermanent-loss or exit-liquidity risk.

Risk is high, reflected by 81/100, because both assets can move abruptly and external liquidity depth is not established. The pool's $5K liquidity base and 0.00x turnover may support fees, but they do not remove impermanent-loss or exit-liquidity risk.

For GNOME-GP, review an exit when TVL falls below its current $5K level, fee-generating volume weakens from the current $14, or one token begins a sustained move against the other. The live verdict EXIT and exit score 93/100 already indicate that waiting for a clearer deterioration is not the only risk.

For GNOME-GP, review an exit when TVL falls below its current $5K level, fee-generating volume weakens from the current $14, or one token begins a sustained move against the other. The live verdict EXIT and exit score 93/100 already indicate that waiting for a clearer deterioration is not the only risk.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Break-even requires cumulative fee income, currently represented by 0.6%, to exceed the position's price-divergence loss while 0.00x turnover persists.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Break-even requires cumulative fee income, currently represented by 0.6%, to exceed the position's price-divergence loss while 0.00x turnover persists.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights