CARDS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $72.91K
- APR
- 124.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $93.67K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.16% fee
- Pool address
- 7NZrVFox…BGkL · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 53/100 gives this pool a differentiated but not dominant position: Enter is 48/100, Hold is 59/100, and Exit is 23/100, with the live verdict HOLD from ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #830 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish superiority over alternatives without a protocol-median volume comparison. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-funded activity and a 1.28x turnover ratio, balanced against memecoin volatility and incomplete range and lifecycle data. A sustained TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, sharp reduction in volume, or worsening CARDS liquidity would change the assessment toward exit; durable fee flow and stable liquidity would support continued holding.
Computed 2026-08-23 21:11 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$72.91K
Total value locked
$93.67K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up124.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 61.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current CARDS-USDC price and set a rebalance trigger for any move outside that range; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if fee generation weakens while CARDS volume and available liquidity deteriorate.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 124.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 80.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $93.67K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $149.87 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#6 of 15 CARDS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#236 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1248 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but large CARDS price moves can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than holding CARDS and USDC separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 80.8% fee APR and 43.3% reward APR, with 65% of yield from trading fees. No current reward contribution is shown, so emission decay is not presently reducing the displayed APR; future fee APR will depend on whether trading volume persists. A reward-expiry timetable is not supplied.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and time spent in the active tick range are not available in the supplied metrics, so short-term LP efficiency cannot be validated from those measures. As a MEMECOIN pool, CARDS-USDC carries sharp price-move risk, potentially rapid volume decay, and adverse selection when CARDS trends strongly in one direction. With no displayed reward contribution, exit timing should be based on fee flow, liquidity conditions, and CARDS momentum rather than expected emissions.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the quoted dollar unit for its price. The supplied data does not establish CARDS liquidity depth across other Solana venues; thin external liquidity would make price moves and LP rebalancing more disruptive. A CARDS rally or selloff changes the pool composition and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the two assets.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the comparatively stable side of the pair and anchors the pool's dollar valuation. Its broader Solana liquidity can help facilitate hedging or exit, but that does not remove CARDS-specific volatility or guarantee liquidity during a market shock. When CARDS falls, the LP generally accumulates more CARDS relative to USDC; when CARDS rises, it tends to sell CARDS into the move.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but large CARDS price moves can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than holding CARDS and USDC separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7NZrVFoxvujd74cHuUAJ17HwTcAjcu7q9vfYxhz2BGkL
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 8/17/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
CARDS-USDC currently shows 43.3% reward APR and 80.8% fee APR, so the displayed yield is not dependent on active emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
CARDS-USDC currently shows 43.3% reward APR and 80.8% fee APR, so the displayed yield is not dependent on active emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The pool already shows 43.3% reward APR, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed total. The remaining APR would be 80.8%, subject to changes in swap volume, liquidity, and fee rates.
The pool already shows 43.3% reward APR, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed total. The remaining APR would be 80.8%, subject to changes in swap volume, liquidity, and fee rates.
The risk is elevated because CARDS can move sharply, trading activity can decay quickly, and the pool's recent impermanent-loss and active-range history is not available in the supplied data. The current position has $73K liquidity and 1.28x volume relative to liquidity, but turnover does not eliminate directional or liquidity risk.
The risk is elevated because CARDS can move sharply, trading activity can decay quickly, and the pool's recent impermanent-loss and active-range history is not available in the supplied data. The current position has $73K liquidity and 1.28x volume relative to liquidity, but turnover does not eliminate directional or liquidity risk.
For CARDS-USDC, consider exiting when fee generation no longer compensates for CARDS price risk, when liquidity or volume contracts materially, or when the position repeatedly leaves its chosen range. A falling 80.8% alongside weakening volume is a clearer exit signal than the headline 124.1% alone.
For CARDS-USDC, consider exiting when fee generation no longer compensates for CARDS price risk, when liquidity or volume contracts materially, or when the position repeatedly leaves its chosen range. A falling 80.8% alongside weakening volume is a clearer exit signal than the headline 124.1% alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not supplied. Fee recovery depends on future trading activity; the current reference is 80.8% fee APR, not a guaranteed return, while CARDS price divergence can change the loss faster than fees repay it.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not supplied. Fee recovery depends on future trading activity; the current reference is 80.8% fee APR, not a guaranteed return, while CARDS price divergence can change the loss faster than fees repay it.
