DNUT-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $39.40K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.04M 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 7SDxyyrK…7t8o · observed 2026-11-06
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #196 among 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it well above most listed pools, but the score does not remove the pool's memecoin and range-management risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume collapsed, price volatility produced sustained IL, or the pool's fee-funded APR fell materially; stronger and persistent turnover with stable liquidity would support a more favorable view.
Computed 2026-11-05 23:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$39.40K
Total value locked
$1.04M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1791.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit rule: use a narrow range centered on the current DNUT/USDC price, rebalance when price reaches either range boundary, and exit if pool TVL drains materially or fee generation no longer justifies the MEMECOIN exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.04M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $12.46K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 7 DNUT-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#103 of 19999 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1053 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the DNUT-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing DNUT and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward one token and be worth less than simply holding both if DNUT moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on sustained DNUT-USDC trading rather than a stated emissions schedule. Reward duration is not established in the supplied pool data, so the reward component should not be treated as a persistent source of return.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so realized IL cannot be used to validate the quoted fee return. Recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, leaving the LP's actual range utilization unverified. As a MEMECOIN pool, DNUT-USDC carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-timing risk; fee income may not offset losses if DNUT reprices rapidly or trading migrates elsewhere.
tollDNUT Context
DNUT is the volatile side of this pair, while USDC provides the dollar-denominated reference asset. Liquidity depth for DNUT outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a DNUT price move can produce meaningful inventory imbalance and execution slippage for the LP. A sharp DNUT rally or decline changes the LP's token mix through arbitrage and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding DNUT and USDC.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the comparatively stable quote asset used to value DNUT in this pool. USDC has broad liquidity elsewhere in Solana markets, but that does not guarantee deep liquidity for DNUT-USDC specifically. If DNUT weakens, the position tends to accumulate DNUT; if DNUT rises, arbitrage tends to leave the LP with more USDC and less DNUT.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing DNUT and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward one token and be worth less than simply holding both if DNUT moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7SDxyyrK7xjZHF3ybVVUwWTFxYrC7AekyMDZ2UCx7t8o
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- DNUT (DNUTsCvK…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 9/25/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently attributes its return to 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield from fees. Because the reward schedule is not established in the supplied data, emission decay is not the main quantified APR driver here; changes in DNUT-USDC trading activity are.
The pool currently attributes its return to 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield from fees. Because the reward schedule is not established in the supplied data, emission decay is not the main quantified APR driver here; changes in DNUT-USDC trading activity are.
The stated reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a currently quantified reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on 500.0% in trading fees, which can fall if volume or liquidity declines.
The stated reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a currently quantified reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on 500.0% in trading fees, which can fall if volume or liquidity declines.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because DNUT can move sharply, liquidity can become thin, and the LP's token mix changes as arbitrage trades against the pool. The supplied data does not provide recent seven-day IL or tick-in-range readings, so recent realized range and price risk cannot be quantified.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because DNUT can move sharply, liquidity can become thin, and the LP's token mix changes as arbitrage trades against the pool. The supplied data does not provide recent seven-day IL or tick-in-range readings, so recent realized range and price risk cannot be quantified.
For DNUT-USDC, use a pre-set price-range boundary or a deterioration in pool conditions as an exit trigger. A TVL drain, a sustained drop in fee generation from 500.0%, or a DNUT move that leaves the position heavily concentrated in one token are concrete reasons to reassess.
For DNUT-USDC, use a pre-set price-range boundary or a deterioration in pool conditions as an exit trigger. A TVL drain, a sustained drop in fee generation from 500.0%, or a DNUT move that leaves the position heavily concentrated in one token are concrete reasons to reassess.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent IL data is unavailable and fee income changes with trading volume. At the current quoted fee rate of 500.0%, break-even requires cumulative fees to exceed the position's price divergence and other execution costs; it should not be inferred from 500.0% alone.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent IL data is unavailable and fee income changes with trading volume. At the current quoted fee rate of 500.0%, break-even requires cumulative fees to exceed the position's price divergence and other execution costs; it should not be inferred from 500.0% alone.
