Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 with Enter 10/100 / Hold 30/100 / Exit 60/100 supports a conditional AVOID, not a strong directional signal. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1846 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not among the highest-ranked opportunities. The assessment would weaken after a sustained TVL drain, lower trading volume, or a collapse in fee-only yield; it would improve only if liquidity and fee generation became more persistent without materially increasing memecoin price risk.
Computed 2026-11-11 16:22 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$718.74K
Total value locked
$93.16K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up14.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -6.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL-HAROLD price, rebalance when price exits that range, and consider exiting if 0.13x remains below 0.05x for three consecutive days or if fee-only APR falls materially below 13.3%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 14.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 13.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $93.16K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $232.89 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-HAROLD pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4148 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8633 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-HAROLD liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and HAROLD into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding both tokens if their prices move differently.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 13.3% and reward-only APR of 0.9%, for total APR of 14.2%. 94% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, while the supplied metrics do not establish a current reward schedule. With no stated reward component, emission decay is not currently the direct source of the quoted APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
The supplied metrics do not provide a usable recent impermanent-loss reading or tick-in-range history, so recent loss magnitude and range utilization cannot be assessed from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-HAROLD carries substantial token-price and liquidity-concentration risk; any future emissions could decay, making exit timing important before incentives fall and fee income becomes the sole support for LP returns.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single memecoin pool. SOL price movement relative to HAROLD changes the pair's balance and can create impermanent loss, while sharp SOL moves can also push a concentrated position outside its active range.
tollHAROLD Context
HAROLD is the memecoin leg and its external liquidity depth is not established by the supplied pool metrics. A sharp HAROLD repricing can dominate the pair's relative-price movement, increase impermanent-loss exposure, and leave LP capital concentrated in HAROLD after arbitrage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and HAROLD into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding both tokens if their prices move differently.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7SJ5UKJoqBUGjt1PT7AeSF7FKPgpnxeYMHHcejTiGQzc
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- HAROLD (3vgopg7x…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.9%, so the stated 14.2% APR is supported by fee income rather than active emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving 13.3% dependent on trading activity.
The current reward-only APR is 0.9%, so the stated 14.2% APR is supported by fee income rather than active emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving 13.3% dependent on trading activity.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.9%, expiration would not remove a stated reward contribution from the present figures. Future incentives would make the pool more dependent on 13.3% and the trading volume represented by 0.13x.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.9%, expiration would not remove a stated reward contribution from the present figures. Future incentives would make the pool more dependent on 13.3% and the trading volume represented by 0.13x.
Risk is high because HAROLD can move sharply against SOL and may have less external liquidity than SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and range-use history is not provided, so the loss profile cannot be quantified from this sheet; 94% of stated yield comes from fees and 0.13x measures current volume relative to TVL.
Risk is high because HAROLD can move sharply against SOL and may have less external liquidity than SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and range-use history is not provided, so the loss profile cannot be quantified from this sheet; 94% of stated yield comes from fees and 0.13x measures current volume relative to TVL.
Review an exit when trading activity weakens, fee-only APR falls below your required return, or price leaves your active range. For SOL-HAROLD, a sustained decline from 0.13x or a TVL drain would be a clearer exit signal than the quoted 14.2% alone.
Review an exit when trading activity weakens, fee-only APR falls below your required return, or price leaves your active range. For SOL-HAROLD, a sustained decline from 0.13x or a TVL drain would be a clearer exit signal than the quoted 14.2% alone.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not supplied and future fee generation is variable. The main inputs would be 13.3%, 0.13x, and whether trading fees persist long enough to offset the pair's relative-price divergence.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not supplied and future fee generation is variable. The main inputs would be 13.3%, 0.13x, and whether trading fees persist long enough to offset the pair's relative-price divergence.
