new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT: ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong EXIT signal marked unopposed. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a weak relative position in the scanned set, not a guarantee of loss; the assessment would improve only with sustained volume and fee generation, stable or growing TVL, and removal of the critical scanner finding, while a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-09-22 06:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$131.27K
Total value locked
$1.43K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a hard exit rule if 0.01x remains at its current level through the next review period or if TVL begins draining; do not widen a concentrated range to compensate for weak fee generation without a corresponding rise in volume.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.43K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.57 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-LESTER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1170 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2855 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LESTER liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LESTER into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You may receive trading fees, but a large price change in LESTER can leave you with a different mix of assets and less value than holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR is 0.8%, decomposed into fee-only APR of 0.8% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the current return is entirely dependent on trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, and no active reward stream is reflected in the current APR; any future emissions would be subject to the decay and removal schedules set by the farm.
shieldRisk Assessment
The seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, LESTER introduces sharper price, liquidity, and exit-risk uncertainty than the SOL leg; emissions can decay, and the unknown lifecycle and absent persistence history make exit timing more important than relying on historical durability. The low trading activity also means fee income may not compensate for adverse token movement.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the comparatively liquid and broadly traded asset in this pair, with deeper liquidity elsewhere across Solana markets than LESTER. SOL price moves change the pool's asset mix and can create divergence from simply holding SOL, while broader SOL liquidity may make it easier to hedge or exit that leg.
tollLESTER Context
LESTER is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine much of the pair's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. A sharp LESTER move can increase divergence and impermanent-loss exposure, while weak LESTER liquidity can make exiting the LP position more costly than exiting SOL alone.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LESTER into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You may receive trading fees, but a large price change in LESTER can leave you with a different mix of assets and less value than holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7TkVaEEG8CpMutTpkQMGDEdsRi1GxnjA1NzKiTPKbxnE
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LESTER (5z3iCe53…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
359%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
20%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so no active reward stream is contributing to the displayed return. If emissions are introduced later, decay would reduce that component over time, while the fee-only APR remains 0.8% only if trading volume persists.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so no active reward stream is contributing to the displayed return. If emissions are introduced later, decay would reduce that component over time, while the fee-only APR remains 0.8% only if trading volume persists.
The reward component would remain at or move toward 0.0%, leaving fee income of 0.8% as the stated source of yield. Because 100% already attributes the current yield to fees, incentive expiry would matter mainly if rewards are later added.
The reward component would remain at or move toward 0.0%, leaving fee income of 0.8% as the stated source of yield. Because 100% already attributes the current yield to fees, incentive expiry would matter mainly if rewards are later added.
Risk is elevated because LESTER can move sharply or become difficult to trade, while the pool's $131K TVL and 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio indicate limited current activity. Fees may therefore be insufficient to offset price divergence, and recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable.
Risk is elevated because LESTER can move sharply or become difficult to trade, while the pool's $131K TVL and 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio indicate limited current activity. Fees may therefore be insufficient to offset price divergence, and recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable.
For SOL-LESTER, an exit rule is justified if volume stays at 0.01x, TVL declines from $131K, or the scanner's critical finding remains unresolved. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for incentives that are not currently contributing yield has weak justification.
For SOL-LESTER, an exit rule is justified if volume stays at 0.01x, TVL declines from $131K, or the scanner's critical finding remains unresolved. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for incentives that are not currently contributing yield has weak justification.
There is no responsible fixed break-even estimate because the recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and fee income depends on variable volume. With fee-only APR of 0.8%, break-even requires enough future fees to offset the actual price divergence and withdrawal conditions.
There is no responsible fixed break-even estimate because the recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and fee income depends on variable volume. With fee-only APR of 0.8%, break-even requires enough future fees to offset the actual price divergence and withdrawal conditions.
