Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 19/100 with Enter 10/100, Hold 30/100, and Exit 60/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented assessment, consistent with the live verdict AVOID. The scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine reads hold, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed; the pool ranks #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. The low activity relative to liquidity is material, and no protocol-median volume ratio is available for a direct benchmark. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume and fee generation, stronger liquidity persistence, and removal of the critical or unopposed exit signals; a TVL drain, weaker volume, or collapse in fee yield would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-26 20:36 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$593.91K
Total value locked
$8.31K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the existing unopposed EXIT signal as the entry filter: do not add capital while the scanner remains CRITICAL and the pool remains at 0.01x volume-to-liquidity. If already providing liquidity, set a review trigger for continued critical status, a material TVL drain, or further volume deterioration, and exit rather than waiting for emissions to compensate.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $8.31K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $20.77 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-DHC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3230 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6817 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-DHC liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DHC into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens, especially if DHC moves sharply or becomes hard to sell.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 3.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, for a Total APR of 3.1%. Fee sustainability is 98%, so the return is dependent on swap activity rather than emissions. The reward dependency and schedule are not established, so the reward component should not be treated as persistent or forecastable.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also not reported, so realized price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-DHC carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk; emission decay can reduce any reward contribution, while the absence of a known lifecycle makes exit timing dependent on volume, TVL, and market interest rather than a published schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and the settlement side of this pool, with substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than DHC. SOL price movement against DHC changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for an LP even when the position remains active.
tollDHC Context
DHC is the memecoin side of SOL-DHC, so its price discovery and liquidity are likely to be more concentrated than SOL's across the wider market. A sharp DHC move, a collapse in DHC trading activity, or difficulty exiting DHC can increase inventory imbalance and realized slippage for LPs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DHC into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens, especially if DHC moves sharply or becomes hard to sell.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7ZRtFcgfxKcUfdACiWf9abqBs9mVy569VeDLdLxb7Ztx
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- DHC (DCHLn5uL…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 3.1% and total stated APR is 3.1%. If emissions decline, the reward portion can disappear; the remaining return depends on trading fees and the pool's 0.01x activity ratio.
The reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 3.1% and total stated APR is 3.1%. If emissions decline, the reward portion can disappear; the remaining return depends on trading fees and the pool's 0.01x activity ratio.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees of 3.1% as the stated source of LP yield. Because reward persistence is not established, incentives should not be assumed to support the position after any undisclosed end date.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees of 3.1% as the stated source of LP yield. Because reward persistence is not established, incentives should not be assumed to support the position after any undisclosed end date.
Risk is elevated because DHC can move sharply or lose liquidity while SOL has deeper, independent markets. This can leave the LP holding a less favorable mix of SOL and DHC, with no recent impermanent-loss or range-utilization history available to quantify the effect.
Risk is elevated because DHC can move sharply or lose liquidity while SOL has deeper, independent markets. This can leave the LP holding a less favorable mix of SOL and DHC, with no recent impermanent-loss or range-utilization history available to quantify the effect.
For SOL-DHC, an unopposed EXIT signal and CRITICAL scanner status are already reasons to require a clear improvement before adding capital. Exit or reduce exposure if those signals persist alongside falling TVL, weaker volume than $8K, or a deterioration from the current 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio.
For SOL-DHC, an unopposed EXIT signal and CRITICAL scanner status are already reasons to require a clear improvement before adding capital. Exit or reduce exposure if those signals persist alongside falling TVL, weaker volume than $8K, or a deterioration from the current 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range coverage are unavailable. Ignoring price divergence, the gross annualized reference is 3.1%; actual break-even can take much longer or never occur if DHC falls, liquidity leaves, or fee volume declines.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range coverage are unavailable. Ignoring price divergence, the gross annualized reference is 3.1%; actual break-even can take much longer or never occur if DHC falls, liquidity leaves, or fee volume declines.
