SPYx-STONKon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $1.35M
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $6.71M 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 7a8xxAJB…Ao49 · observed 2026-09-07
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 59/100, with Enter at 60/100, Hold at 59/100, and Exit at 25/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #830 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, this places the pool in a middle segment rather than among the strongest or weakest alternatives, consistent with high fee generation but material memecoin and range risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume weakened enough to reduce fee APR, price divergence caused persistent out-of-range exposure, or a reward program materially changed the return composition.
Computed 2026-09-07 13:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.35M
Total value locked
$6.71M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 698.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a range around the current SPYX-STONK price and rebalance when price remains outside that range for a full trading session; exit rather than re-range if 24-hour volume falls below TVL, because the pool would no longer be maintaining its current turnover relative to liquidity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.71M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $67.10K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SPYx-STONK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#92 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #795 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SPYx-STONK liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPYX and STONK into a price range so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the token that performed worse and can stop fee collection if price leaves your range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from emissions, with 100%. Because the current return is fee-generated, APR depends on sustained swap flow, fee tier, and the share of volume captured by the position's active ticks. Reward duration is not established, so no reliable reward runway can be assigned.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and seven-day tick-in-range coverage are not reported, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be verified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, both tokens can move sharply or diverge for reasons unrelated to pool fundamentals, while concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees when price leaves the selected range. Emission decay is an additional timing risk if incentives are introduced later: exit decisions should be made before fee flow or any temporary emissions weaken, rather than assuming the current return persists.
tollSPYx Context
SPYX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity market, but separate liquidity depth for SPYX outside this pool is not supplied. If SPYX appreciates or sells off faster than STONK, the LP position becomes increasingly exposed to the relative-price move and may end up holding more of the weaker-performing asset after rebalancing.
tollSTONK Context
STONK is the counter-asset to SPYX in this pool, and its independent liquidity depth is also not supplied. A sharp STONK move or a widening SPYX-STONK price relationship can move the position out of range, reduce fee capture, and increase divergence loss even while the pool remains active.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPYX and STONK into a price range so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the token that performed worse and can stop fee collection if price leaves your range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7a8xxAJBELDo6P9dikSYctdw6ce8F4mWr3ahcAD8Ao49
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SPYx (XsoCS1Tf…)
- Token B
- STONK (6GmAFSYs…)
- Created
- 7/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is represented by 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100%. If emissions are added and later decay, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset the reduction.
The current return is represented by 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100%. If emissions are added and later decay, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset the reduction.
At present, the pool's stated yield is fee-driven, so the direct effect of incentive expiry depends on whether any rewards are introduced before then. If rewards become part of the return and later expire, APR would move toward the fee component, 500.0%, while 100% would need to be reassessed.
At present, the pool's stated yield is fee-driven, so the direct effect of incentive expiry depends on whether any rewards are introduced before then. If rewards become part of the return and later expire, APR would move toward the fee component, 500.0%, while 100% would need to be reassessed.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because SPYX and STONK can both experience abrupt, correlated, or divergent price moves. The pool also has concentrated-range risk, and recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-occupancy readings are not reported.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because SPYX and STONK can both experience abrupt, correlated, or divergent price moves. The pool also has concentrated-range risk, and recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-occupancy readings are not reported.
For this pool, consider exiting when price remains outside your range, when 24-hour volume falls below TVL, or when fee income no longer compensates for the operational cost and divergence risk. A falling fee component from 500.0% is a more relevant signal than headline APR if rewards are introduced.
For this pool, consider exiting when price remains outside your range, when 24-hour volume falls below TVL, or when fee income no longer compensates for the operational cost and divergence risk. A falling fee component from 500.0% is a more relevant signal than headline APR if rewards are introduced.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported and future fee volume is uncertain. Break-even depends on how quickly accumulated fees, currently represented by 500.0%, offset the position's realized divergence loss.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported and future fee volume is uncertain. Break-even depends on how quickly accumulated fees, currently represented by 500.0%, offset the position's realized divergence loss.
