SPYx-STONKon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $1.30M
- APR
- 55.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $145.57K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 7a8xxAJB…Ao49 · observed 2026-10-22
Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 15/100 with Enter 15/100, Hold 16/100, and Exit 87/100 supports the live EXIT assessment rather than a new-entry signal. The ai_engine=hold driver and rank of #120 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools indicate a relatively high placement within the tracked set, but not immunity from memecoin or liquidity risk. The assessment would change if TVL drains, trading volume collapses, fee APR falls materially, or price divergence produces sustained one-sided inventory; stronger persistence and reliable range data would also improve confidence.
Computed 2026-10-22 17:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.30M
Total value locked
$145.57K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up55.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -43.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrower initial tick range than the full pool range and set a rebalance or exit trigger for a material move in the SPYX-to-STONK price, especially when volume weakens enough that fee income no longer compensates for concentrated exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 55.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 43.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $145.57K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.46K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SPYx-STONK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#705 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3959 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SPYx-STONK liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPYX and STONK into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If either token moves sharply or trading activity falls, your withdrawal may contain more of one token, and its value can be lower than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 43.9% fee APR and 11.2% reward APR, with 80% of yield attributed to trading fees. Because the reward dependency and reward schedule are not established, the fee rate should be treated as dependent on continued trading volume rather than emissions. The absence of reward APR means emission decay is not currently the main source of stated yield, but fee income can fall quickly if volume or liquidity declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range measurements are not available, so the pool's realized loss experience and share of liquidity currently in range cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SPYX-STONK carries sharp price-divergence, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk; emission decay is a family-level concern if incentives are introduced later, while exit timing should account for falling volume and widening execution costs.
tollSPYx Context
SPYX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair and exposes the LP to its price path relative to STONK. The supplied metrics do not establish SPYX's liquidity depth outside this pool; a sharp SPYX move can leave the position concentrated in the weaker asset and increase rebalancing or exit costs.
tollSTONK Context
STONK is the counter-asset against which SPYX's relative price is managed in this pool. Its external liquidity depth is not established by the supplied data, and a rapid STONK move can push the position toward one-sided inventory or cause losses relative to simply holding both tokens.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPYX and STONK into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If either token moves sharply or trading activity falls, your withdrawal may contain more of one token, and its value can be lower than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7a8xxAJBELDo6P9dikSYctdw6ce8F4mWr3ahcAD8Ao49
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SPYx (XsoCS1Tf…)
- Token B
- STONK (6GmAFSYs…)
- Created
- 7/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated reward APR is 11.2%, while fee APR is 43.9% and fee sustainability is 80%. Emission decay therefore does not currently explain the stated APR, but any future reward program would reduce yield as emissions decline unless trading fees replace it.
The current stated reward APR is 11.2%, while fee APR is 43.9% and fee sustainability is 80%. Emission decay therefore does not currently explain the stated APR, but any future reward program would reduce yield as emissions decline unless trading fees replace it.
The currently reported reward contribution is 11.2%, so the stated return is based on 43.9% in trading fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading volume, liquidity, and the resulting fee APR rather than emissions.
The currently reported reward contribution is 11.2%, so the stated return is based on 43.9% in trading fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading volume, liquidity, and the resulting fee APR rather than emissions.
Risk is high relative to less volatile asset pairs because SPYX and STONK can move sharply, liquidity can leave quickly, and concentrated ranges can become inactive. The supplied data do not provide recent impermanent-loss or in-range history, so those risks cannot be quantified from this sheet.
Risk is high relative to less volatile asset pairs because SPYX and STONK can move sharply, liquidity can leave quickly, and concentrated ranges can become inactive. The supplied data do not provide recent impermanent-loss or in-range history, so those risks cannot be quantified from this sheet.
Consider exiting or narrowing exposure when volume and fee income deteriorate, TVL drains, the pair moves persistently toward one-sided inventory, or execution costs rise. For this pool, the live assessment is EXIT, so a change toward weaker volume, liquidity, or fee conditions would be a concrete exit signal.
Consider exiting or narrowing exposure when volume and fee income deteriorate, TVL drains, the pair moves persistently toward one-sided inventory, or execution costs rise. For this pool, the live assessment is EXIT, so a change toward weaker volume, liquidity, or fee conditions would be a concrete exit signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. The theoretical offset is 43.9%, but that rate is not guaranteed and should be compared with the magnitude and duration of the pair's price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. The theoretical offset is 43.9%, but that rate is not guaranteed and should be compared with the magnitude and duration of the pair's price divergence.
