WealthVille
SOL
S
XIN
X

SOL-XINon Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $24.97K
APR
2.6% APR
24h Volume
$499.52 24h vol
Fee tier
0.40% fee
Pool address
7dMKzzRk…rgs5 · observed 2026-10-08
19F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict AVOID · 58% confidence

ai_engine=holdhigh risk (0.73) + weak yield → avoid
How this score works →
Enter10

new capital

Hold30

keep position

Exit60

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 19/100 combines an Enter score of 10/100, Hold score of 30/100, and Exit score of 60/100, producing the live verdict AVOID from the ai_engine=hold driver. The pool ranks #1023 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, which places it in a relatively stronger part of the tracked set without indicating that its low-liquidity and memecoin risks are absent. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, trading activity fell, or fee yield collapsed; it would improve if sustained volume increased without a comparable rise in liquidity risk.

Computed 2026-10-08 00:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$24.97K

Total value locked

$499.52

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

2.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -18.6%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.40% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 277m agoTVL ↓2.9%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 73/100
tips_and_updates

Use a deliberately narrow initial tick range only if you can monitor it frequently; rebalance or exit when the position leaves its intended range or when volume falls materially below the level implied by 0.02x. Do not wait for a reward-based exit signal, because the current yield is fee-derived.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR2.6%——
Fee APR2.5%——
Volume$499.52——
Fees Earned$2.00——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
2.1%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−20.7%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-18.6%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.02x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0001
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 4 SOL-XIN pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1002 of 18470 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 7% of all Solana pools

overall rank #8826 of 132693

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-XIN liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing both SOL and XIN into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool to swap between the two assets, and you receive part of the trading fees, but your final holdings can shift toward the asset that performed worse.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The stated APR decomposes into 2.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the yield is fee-derived, so there is no current reward component supporting the headline rate. Reward dependency and the pool lifecycle are not established, making future yield dependent mainly on sustained trading activity and fee generation.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history is not available for this pool, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, so the realized effect of range placement cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-XIN remains exposed to sharp relative price moves and liquidity withdrawal. Any future emissions may decay, while exit timing matters because a thin pool can make rebalancing or closing a position more costly during volatility.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. If SOL moves sharply against XIN, the concentrated position can accumulate more of the depreciating side, while SOL's broader market liquidity may make the pool's price divergence easier to observe than to offset.

tollXIN Context

XIN is the memecoin-side asset, and its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp XIN repricing or a reduction in outside liquidity can increase divergence losses and make timely exit more difficult, particularly when pool volume is low.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing both SOL and XIN into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool to swap between the two assets, and you receive part of the trading fees, but your final holdings can shift toward the asset that performed worse.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

XIN
XINMixinSolana
Explorer

Mixin (XIN) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
7dMKzzRkMbhWfNLW9GQ2KSkmwFPCW8YPfLqZcCKCrgs5
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
XIN (4s4H5v4T…)
Created
6/24/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward component is represented by 0.0%, while fee income is 2.5% and total APR is 2.6%. Because the stated yield is fee-led, emission decay would matter mainly if future incentives are introduced; without sustained trading volume, fee APR can still decline.

The current reward component is represented by 0.0%, while fee income is 2.5% and total APR is 2.6%. Because the stated yield is fee-led, emission decay would matter mainly if future incentives are introduced; without sustained trading volume, fee APR can still decline.

There is no current reward contribution reflected in the stated APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward component from the present figures. Future yield would depend on 2.5% and the pool's trading volume, rather than emissions.

There is no current reward contribution reflected in the stated APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward component from the present figures. Future yield would depend on 2.5% and the pool's trading volume, rather than emissions.

Risk is elevated because XIN can move sharply against SOL, and the pool has limited liquidity relative to larger Solana venues. The stated fee yield is 2.5%, but it may not offset price divergence, trading losses, or the cost of exiting a thin pool.

Risk is elevated because XIN can move sharply against SOL, and the pool has limited liquidity relative to larger Solana venues. The stated fee yield is 2.5%, but it may not offset price divergence, trading losses, or the cost of exiting a thin pool.

Consider exiting when the position leaves its intended price range, when TVL begins draining, or when trading activity no longer supports 2.5%. A sharp deterioration in the live verdict AVOID or a move toward the pool's low Exit score of 60/100 would also warrant review.

Consider exiting when the position leaves its intended price range, when TVL begins draining, or when trading activity no longer supports 2.5%. A sharp deterioration in the live verdict AVOID or a move toward the pool's low Exit score of 60/100 would also warrant review.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on changing volume. The relevant comparison is cumulative fee income of 2.5% against the eventual divergence loss, rather than a guaranteed recovery period based on 2.6%.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on changing volume. The relevant comparison is cumulative fee income of 2.5% against the eventual divergence loss, rather than a guaranteed recovery period based on 2.6%.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights