new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 is below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it in a weak relative position, not a standalone quality assessment. A sustained increase in volume and TVL, improved scanner status, or demonstrably stronger fee generation could change the assessment; further TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-09-14 16:44 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$33.56K
Total value locked
$25.29
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Do not enter while the live verdict remains EXIT; for an existing position, use the scanner's unopposed strong EXIT signal as the immediate exit trigger rather than waiting for emissions or fee volume to improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $25.29 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.06 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 QBIT-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12982 of 67260 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 16% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18249 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the QBIT-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing QBIT and SOL into the same pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding both tokens if QBIT or SOL moves sharply, and the current return is small because trading activity is limited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.0% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, for total APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield is fee-funded, so the return depends on swap activity rather than active emissions. No established reward schedule is available, so emission timing and any future reward change should not be treated as predictable income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, leaving recent price divergence and range utilization unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, QBIT-SOL carries discontinuous price, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emission decay can remove any incremental incentive, while low trading activity limits fee compensation. The current 0.00x volume/TVL ratio indicates that fee generation is not currently supported by substantial turnover.
tollQBIT Context
QBIT is the memecoin side of this QBIT/SOL pool, so QBIT price moves directly change the pool's asset balance and can create losses relative to simply holding the tokens. The supplied metrics do not establish QBIT's liquidity depth elsewhere; thin external liquidity would increase slippage and make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base-asset side of the pair and generally provides the reference value against which QBIT is priced in this pool. SOL's broader market liquidity can support execution, but a sharp SOL move still changes the pair price and can alter the LP's exposure even when QBIT is unchanged.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing QBIT and SOL into the same pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding both tokens if QBIT or SOL moves sharply, and the current return is small because trading activity is limited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7k8YkaeHrTzHSTUjNAfZoBZ88KYCx4Z37E9xqNG2ruvK
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- QBIT (QB1TPvpN…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
138%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.0% and fee-only APR is 0.0%. Because the listed yield is fee-funded, emission decay has little current effect, but any future reward component would fall as emissions decline.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.0% and fee-only APR is 0.0%. Because the listed yield is fee-funded, emission decay has little current effect, but any future reward component would fall as emissions decline.
The reward-only APR would fall to zero or remain at its current level if no rewards are active, leaving trading fees as the return source. That would make 0.0% the relevant yield measure rather than 0.0%, with outcomes dependent on $25 volume.
The reward-only APR would fall to zero or remain at its current level if no rewards are active, leaving trading fees as the return source. That would make 0.0% the relevant yield measure rather than 0.0%, with outcomes dependent on $25 volume.
Risk is elevated because QBIT can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established here, and the pool has $34K TVL against $25 daily volume. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the size of recent price-impact risk cannot be quantified from this data.
Risk is elevated because QBIT can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established here, and the pool has $34K TVL against $25 daily volume. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the size of recent price-impact risk cannot be quantified from this data.
For this pool, the current live verdict is EXIT and the scanner reports a CRITICAL, unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should treat persistence of that signal, declining $34K, or weaker fee activity than reflected by 0.00x as concrete exit conditions.
For this pool, the current live verdict is EXIT and the scanner reports a CRITICAL, unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should treat persistence of that signal, declining $34K, or weaker fee activity than reflected by 0.00x as concrete exit conditions.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee volume is only $25 against $34K TVL. At 0.0% total APR, recovery would also depend on QBIT/SOL price divergence and whether trading fees persist at the current rate.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee volume is only $25 against $34K TVL. At 0.0% total APR, recovery would also depend on QBIT/SOL price divergence and whether trading fees persist at the current rate.
