new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 places this pool in a middle range, while Enter 46/100, Hold 57/100, and Exit 25/100 produce a live HOLD assessment. The pool ranks #364 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so the ranking is relatively strong within the tracked set, but it does not remove memecoin volatility or shallow-liquidity risk. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; durable fee volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-15 03:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$50.22K
Total value locked
$64.63K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up253.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 85.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can actively monitor, and withdraw or recenter when SOL-AI16Z leaves that band; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if volume-to-liquidity falls materially below 1.29x or fee income weakens.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 253.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 126.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $64.63K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $161.58 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 18 SOL-ai16z pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1033 of 67260 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2728 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ai16z liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AI16Z into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of the two tokens you hold can change, and the memecoin price can fall sharply before you exit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 126.5% from swap fees and 127.0% from rewards, with 50% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the relevant current income source; any future emissions should be treated as temporary until their duration and funding are confirmed.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available, so the position's realized price-divergence cost and range efficiency cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AI16Z carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk. Emission decay is not currently the displayed yield driver, but any later incentives may decline quickly, making exit timing important when rewards are introduced or trading activity weakens.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's base asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than AI16Z, which can make its price the more reliable reference for rebalancing. SOL price moves relative to AI16Z determine inventory shifts and impermanent loss: a sustained divergence can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset.
tollai16z Context
AI16Z is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and price discovery concentrated more heavily in volatile, thinner markets than SOL. A sharp AI16Z move can increase fee generation if trading continues, but it can also create larger inventory imbalance, wider execution costs, and greater exit risk for the LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AI16Z into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of the two tokens you hold can change, and the memecoin price can fall sharply before you exit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7qAVrzrbULwg1B13YseqA95Uapf8EVp9jQE5uipqFMoP
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ai16z (HeLp6NuQ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
242%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed APR is composed of 126.5% in fees and 127.0% in rewards, so current yield is fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward component without changing fee income.
The displayed APR is composed of 126.5% in fees and 127.0% in rewards, so current yield is fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward component without changing fee income.
If incentives are introduced and then expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining yield would depend on 126.5% and future trading volume. Because 50% already comes from fees, the pool's post-incentive economics should be judged primarily on fee generation and liquidity depth.
If incentives are introduced and then expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining yield would depend on 126.5% and future trading volume. Because 50% already comes from fees, the pool's post-incentive economics should be judged primarily on fee generation and liquidity depth.
Risk is high because AI16Z can diverge sharply from SOL, while the pool's liquidity is limited to $50K. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable, so the realized impact of price divergence cannot be assessed from the supplied history.
Risk is high because AI16Z can diverge sharply from SOL, while the pool's liquidity is limited to $50K. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable, so the realized impact of price divergence cannot be assessed from the supplied history.
Consider exiting when the chosen price range is no longer practical to maintain, when liquidity drains, or when volume and fee income deteriorate from current levels of 1.29x and 126.5%. A sharp AI16Z move without continuing fee volume is a stronger exit signal than volatility alone.
Consider exiting when the chosen price range is no longer practical to maintain, when liquidity drains, or when volume and fee income deteriorate from current levels of 1.29x and 126.5%. A sharp AI16Z move without continuing fee volume is a stronger exit signal than volatility alone.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable, and future volume is uncertain. At a steady 126.5%, fees may offset price-divergence losses over time, but the result depends on the path of SOL and AI16Z prices and whether the position remains in range.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable, and future volume is uncertain. At a steady 126.5%, fees may offset price-divergence losses over time, but the result depends on the path of SOL and AI16Z prices and whether the position remains in range.
