

BEAT-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $6.45M
- APR
- 0.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $364.60K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- 81JChRcN…H7n3 · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. Its #1202 of 4410 rank among raydium-clmm pools is consistent with a weak relative position, driven by ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The assessment would improve if sustained volume increased fee generation without a corresponding TVL drain, if range activity became measurable and persistent, or if durable incentives appeared; a TVL drain, lower trading activity, or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit assessment.
Computed 2026-08-23 15:06 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$6.45M
Total value locked
$364.60K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a deliberately narrow range only after checking current BEAT-USDC ticks, and set an automatic review trigger if volume-to-TVL falls materially below 0.06x for three consecutive days or BEAT leaves the selected range; the current EXIT and critical scanner signal do not support passive holding.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $364.60K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $36.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 BEAT-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1325 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 21% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19855 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the BEAT-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing BEAT and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but BEAT's price can move sharply and leave you with a different mix of the two assets, while the current return is low.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives, with fee sustainability at 100%. There is no current reward contribution to offset weak trading activity, and the absence of established reward-duration data makes future incentive support uncertain. Emission decay therefore matters mainly as a risk of further reducing already limited compensation if rewards are introduced or later withdrawn.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss behavior and the share of liquidity remaining in range are not established in the available record, so neither recent price divergence nor range efficiency can be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, BEAT-USDC is exposed to rapid BEAT repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and one-sided demand; a narrow concentrated range can amplify fee loss when BEAT moves sharply. Emission decay and uncertain incentive persistence also make exit timing important, particularly when fee income does not compensate for inventory divergence.
tollBEAT Context
BEAT is the volatile side of this pair and supplies the primary directional risk for an LP. Liquidity depth for BEAT outside this pool is not established here; a sharp BEAT move can leave the LP holding more BEAT after a decline or less BEAT after a rally, while concentrated liquidity may stop earning fees outside its range.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the accounting and settlement asset in the pair, providing the relatively stable side against which BEAT is priced. USDC generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues, but that does not remove the pool's BEAT-specific exit risk; BEAT price movement determines how the LP's holdings shift between USDC and BEAT.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing BEAT and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but BEAT's price can move sharply and leave you with a different mix of the two assets, while the current return is low.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 81JChRcNfye2acW42oTYgRcdFcbBHyzaoNJ1SN4EH7n3
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- BEAT (BbB2Wa1h…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 8/17/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 0.2%, consisting of 0.2% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall further, leaving fee income as the main compensation for BEAT price and range risk.
The current return is 0.2%, consisting of 0.2% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall further, leaving fee income as the main compensation for BEAT price and range risk.
Any reward component would disappear, leaving the pool dependent on 0.2% in trading fees. Because current reward income is 0.0% and volume relative to liquidity is 0.06x, expired incentives would not be replaced by a high-fee environment unless trading activity increases.
Any reward component would disappear, leaving the pool dependent on 0.2% in trading fees. Because current reward income is 0.0% and volume relative to liquidity is 0.06x, expired incentives would not be replaced by a high-fee environment unless trading activity increases.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because BEAT can reprice quickly, liquidity can leave, and concentrated positions can fall out of range. The pool offers 0.2% total APR against 0.06x volume-to-liquidity activity, so current fees provide limited compensation for memecoin and inventory risk.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because BEAT can reprice quickly, liquidity can leave, and concentrated positions can fall out of range. The pool offers 0.2% total APR against 0.06x volume-to-liquidity activity, so current fees provide limited compensation for memecoin and inventory risk.
For this pool, the current EXIT and critical scanner signal justify an exit review now rather than waiting for incentives. Withdraw if BEAT leaves your range, volume-to-TVL deteriorates from 0.06x, TVL begins draining, or fee income no longer compensates for the position's inventory risk.
For this pool, the current EXIT and critical scanner signal justify an exit review now rather than waiting for incentives. Withdraw if BEAT leaves your range, volume-to-TVL deteriorates from 0.06x, TVL begins draining, or fee income no longer compensates for the position's inventory risk.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss behavior is not established and fee accrual depends on changing volume and range placement. At 0.2% fee-only APR, recovery would require sustained fee generation and a BEAT price path that allows the position to remain productive.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss behavior is not established and fee accrual depends on changing volume and range placement. At 0.2% fee-only APR, recovery would require sustained fee generation and a BEAT price path that allows the position to remain productive.




