new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That combination indicates the model favors maintaining an existing position more than initiating a new one, while assigning a weak exit score, and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #334 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, but that rank does not remove its small-liquidity and low-activity constraints. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume and fee income weakened enough to reduce 0.7%, or persistent trading and deeper liquidity improved the pool's fee base.
Computed 2026-09-02 13:11 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$30.50K
Total value locked
$227.52
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
For an LP entering this pool, use a range centered on the current DREAM/SOL price only if it can be monitored frequently, and treat a move outside the range or a material decline from $31K as a rebalance or exit trigger. Reassess the position if 0.7% falls materially or if 0.01x declines further, because fee income is the stated source of yield.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $227.52 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.57 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 DREAM-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1185 of 60178 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2099 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the DREAM-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing DREAM and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a portion of fees, but the amounts of DREAM and SOL you hold can change, and either token can fall sharply because DREAM is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 0.7% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield is fee-derived, so the current return does not depend on active emissions; however, the reward dependency and emission lifecycle are not established here. With $228 in 24-hour volume against $31K of TVL, fee generation is sensitive to whether trading activity persists.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and seven-day tick-in-range coverage is also not reported, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, DREAM-SOL carries token-specific price and liquidity risk, including abrupt repricing, thin exits, and asymmetric movement between DREAM and SOL. Emission decay and incentive timing are not established; LPs should assume rewards can change and avoid relying on unverified future emissions when planning an exit.
tollDREAM Context
DREAM is the memecoin side of this pair and is likely to determine most of the pool's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. The available pool data does not establish DREAM's liquidity depth elsewhere, so a sharp DREAM move can create execution loss and impermanent loss even when the fee rate remains unchanged. If DREAM outperforms SOL, the LP generally sells part of that relative gain into the pool; if DREAM falls, the position can become more DREAM-heavy.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the more established reference asset in the pair, with broader Solana ecosystem liquidity than DREAM but still meaningful price volatility. SOL's relative performance changes the pool composition: SOL strength can leave the LP with more DREAM exposure, while DREAM strength can leave it with more SOL exposure. SOL price movement therefore affects both the dollar value of the position and the size of relative-price divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing DREAM and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a portion of fees, but the amounts of DREAM and SOL you hold can change, and either token can fall sharply because DREAM is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8DEVkv9VzwZGta9EYNBRppH5iUpTVHyxDpgoqosdBVsx
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- DREAM (33q5Kax2…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
176%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall further, but the fee component depends on continued trading volume rather than the emissions schedule.
The current return is split between 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall further, but the fee component depends on continued trading volume rather than the emissions schedule.
The reward portion would move toward zero, leaving the fee-only return represented by 0.7%. Because the current yield is already fee-funded at 100%, the main remaining risk is whether $228 of trading activity is sufficient to sustain fee income.
The reward portion would move toward zero, leaving the fee-only return represented by 0.7%. Because the current yield is already fee-funded at 100%, the main remaining risk is whether $228 of trading activity is sufficient to sustain fee income.
Risk is high relative to a pool composed of established assets because DREAM can reprice abruptly and may have thinner exit liquidity. The position also has impermanent-loss exposure, while the pool's $31K liquidity and 0.01x activity ratio provide limited evidence of deep trading demand.
Risk is high relative to a pool composed of established assets because DREAM can reprice abruptly and may have thinner exit liquidity. The position also has impermanent-loss exposure, while the pool's $31K liquidity and 0.01x activity ratio provide limited evidence of deep trading demand.
Consider exiting when DREAM liquidity deteriorates, the position leaves its intended price range, or fee income no longer justifies the token and impermanent-loss risk. For this pool, a sustained decline from $31K, weaker 0.01x, or a material fall in 0.7% are concrete reassessment signals.
Consider exiting when DREAM liquidity deteriorates, the position leaves its intended price range, or fee income no longer justifies the token and impermanent-loss risk. For this pool, a sustained decline from $31K, weaker 0.01x, or a material fall in 0.7% are concrete reassessment signals.
No seven-day impermanent-loss history is available, so a reliable pool-specific break-even period cannot be calculated. As a rough framework, offsetting a one-time loss equal to a given percentage would require approximately that percentage divided by 0.7% in years, before compounding, further price divergence, and changing volume.
No seven-day impermanent-loss history is available, so a reliable pool-specific break-even period cannot be calculated. As a rough framework, offsetting a one-time loss equal to a given percentage would require approximately that percentage divided by 0.7% in years, before compounding, further price divergence, and changing volume.
